Jump to content

Potential future at Melbourne University

Featured Replies

Agreed. Those domestic students that go to Melbourne Uni have long set their allegiance to a footy club. The vast majority of the internationals don't give a damn about footy and never will

Exactly, couldnt agree more.This aspect of the idea is a crock. Other aspects might prove worth investigating.

 

lol

and they have no idea of footy or any allegiance until they lob at Parkville and lo and behold turn into Demons

youre kidding yourself

I might ask you how Carlton got it's supporter base. Part of it was tapping into the migrant and Jewish communities who lived around Carlton and the student communities at the UoM. Success obviously helped but the former factors shouldn't be discounted.

To just say we shouldn't extend ourselves to any community is really short term thinking. You are right. No one expects anyone to turn around and become fanatical Demons. However, we would have access to that population on top of having established facilities where our admin. and playing sectors could be one close to the CBD. If anything, we have been very exclusionary and conservative since I have been a supporter. Time now to start extending ourselves and taking an interest in actual people.

Perhaps you might want to expand upon your theory of 'marketing and relevance'? I might ask you the same question you asked me. You want to market. Who to?

 

Agreed. Those domestic students that go to Melbourne Uni have long set their allegiance to a footy club. The vast majority of the internationals don't give a damn about footy and never will

I know a number of international students who support the hawks due to there proximity to Monash uni. These students are now signed up members and permanent residents.

I know a number of international students who support the hawks due to there proximity to Monash uni. These students are now signed up members and permanent residents.

Much like a drop of blood in the ocean.


Much like a drop of blood in the ocean.

Why is that?

They are young and will be funding the club for a good 50 years.

I might ask you how Carlton got it's supporter base. Part of it was tapping into the migrant and Jewish communities who lived around Carlton and the student communities at the UoM. Success obviously helped but the former factors shouldn't be discounted.

To just say we shouldn't extend ourselves to any community is really short term thinking. You are right. No one expects anyone to turn around and become fanatical Demons. However, we would have access to that population on top of having established facilities where our admin. and playing sectors could be one close to the CBD. If anything, we have been very exclusionary and conservative since I have been a supporter. Time now to start extending ourselves and taking an interest in actual people.

Perhaps you might want to expand upon your theory of 'marketing and relevance'? I might ask you the same question you asked me. You want to market. Who to?

That was a whole different time...middle of last f'n century actually.. Back then people invested of themselves into the area they lived. Barracking was parochial.

Meanwhile turn the wayback machine to 2014 and those that attend a Uni actually LIVE all over the joint.Some internationals and country may reside close for convenience but I could bet choosing a footy team based upon any such proximity is tenuous at best and more likely comically remote

Why is that?

They are young and will be funding the club for a good 50 years.

Who? The international students who come here for a degree?

You're kidding yourself. Sorry but I'm a realist.

 

Makes sence to target young students who have no current allegiances and are from wealthy families. It also could be used to attract athletes internationally to apply for scholarships and work hand in hand in setting up an academy.

Who? The international students who come here for a degree?

You're kidding yourself. Sorry but I'm a realist.

You obviously dont understand the meaning of permanent residency...


Makes sence to target young students who have no current allegiances and are from wealthy families. It also could be used to attract athletes internationally to apply for scholarships and work hand in hand in setting up an academy.

not sure if serious :huh:

That was a whole different time...middle of last f'n century actually.. Back then people invested of themselves into the area they lived. Barracking was parochial.

Meanwhile turn the wayback machine to 2014 and those that attend a Uni actually LIVE all over the joint.Some internationals and country may reside close for convenience but I could bet choosing a footy team based upon any such proximity is tenuous at best and more likely comically remote

Absolutely spot on. People are getting far too ahead of themselves.

Why is that?

They are young and will be funding the club for a good 50 years.

And they may have kids one day who (should current trends maintain) end up barracking for the Hawks.

A lot of the discussion here shows yet again the cargo cult mentality that a lot of us have here. That one thing which will bring instant results will cure all.

If we do move to the UoM, will it bring us 1000's of supporters overnight, fix Trenners' foot and make us win the next twenty premierships? No. It will take years.

If I recall correctly, people were whinging about Hawthorn being out at Arctic Park in the 90's and how they were wasting their time. Turns out it was one of the smartest decisions they ever made as it gave them a base out in the South Eastern suburbs that provides most of their support base. Flags help but that army of supporters didn't magically appear as soon as the Hawks moved to Waverley.

That being said, we should be developing that base out at Casey....

You obviously dont understand the meaning of permanent residency...

No need to be rude because people have a difference of opinion.

I go to uni (albeit in WA) and we have a close affiliation with Fremantle FC. The overseas students could not care less about AFL. That won't change regardless of building facilities at a Uni or not.

Absolutely spot on. People are getting far too ahead of themselves.

Obvuously what we are doing now isnt working. We have been near the bottom of the ladder for close to a decade and cant even pay our full salary cap yey people want things to remain as is.

Its time to tap into a new market, fresh market of young students which many actually live in Melbourne and want to get involved in thr countries culture and sports.


I suggest those getting ahead may wish to revisit TOOT's post a little earlier

http://demonland.com/forums/index.php?/topic/36808-potential-future-at-melbourne-uni/?p=950566

i don't mind an association with the uni but i can't see how it offers the physical facilities required for an afl club without completely compromising its already extremely limited on campus sports facilities and space

That was a whole different time...middle of last f'n century actually.. Back then people invested of themselves into the area they lived. Barracking was parochial.

Meanwhile turn the wayback machine to 2014 and those that attend a Uni actually LIVE all over the joint.Some internationals and country may reside close for convenience but I could bet choosing a footy team based upon any such proximity is tenuous at best and more likely comically remote

And what about the migrant communities? You were saying that the international student community would not follow footy. What makes them so different to the migrants who barrack for Carlton? (who by the way provide the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre with free tickets to matches.)

Again I will ask you, you say that we should rely on the vague terms of 'relevance and marketing' (part of which is that we should put up a billboard outside the airport). Who exactly do you want us to market to?

No need to be rude because people have a difference of opinion.

I go to uni (albeit in WA) and we have a close affiliation with Fremantle FC. The overseas students could not care less about AFL. That won't change regardless of building facilities at a Uni or not.

Well you were commenting on friends of mine ignorently.

That said afl is more prevalent in Victoria and many I know get involved as they have become young professionals.

And they may have kids one day who (should current trends maintain) end up barracking for the Hawks.

A lot of the discussion here shows yet again the cargo cult mentality that a lot of us have here. That one thing which will bring instant results will cure all.

If we do move to the UoM, will it bring us 1000's of supporters overnight, fix Trenners' foot and make us win the next twenty premierships? No. It will take years.

If I recall correctly, people were whinging about Hawthorn being out at Arctic Park in the 90's and how they were wasting their time. Turns out it was one of the smartest decisions they ever made as it gave them a base out in the South Eastern suburbs that provides most of their support base. Flags help but that army of supporters didn't magically appear as soon as the Hawks moved to Waverley.

That being said, we should be developing that base out at Casey....

What study are you basing your comment of "..bring us 1000's of supporters overnight"? I realise your probably being facetious with the overnight comment however it's just a silly call.

Going to a uni won't change a thing. Success on field will.


And what about the migrant communities? You were saying that the international student community would not follow footy. What makes them so different to the migrants who barrack for Carlton? (who by the way provide the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre with free tickets to matches.)

Again I will ask you, you say that we should rely on the vague terms of 'relevance and marketing' (part of which is that we should put up a billboard outside the airport). Who exactly do you want us to market to?

Lets bring you up to speed.

Bartlett recently suggested we needed to thing bigger. Make attending a Melbourne game all part of the Melbourne experience. Advertising who we are as they stream towards this town is just such an exercise in brand building and idea seeding.

Lots of asylum seekers at Uni huh ...

Well you were commenting on friends of mine ignorently.

That said afl is more prevalent in Victoria and many I know get involved as they have become young professionals.

Have you lived in WA?

Lets bring you up to speed.

Bartlett recently suggested we needed to thing bigger. Make attending a Melbourne game all part of the Melbourne experience. Advertising who we are as they stream towards this town is just such an exercise in brand building and idea seeding.

Lots of asylum seekers at Uni huh ...

So yet again, you want a billboard at the airport? No showing any interest in people and getting to know them? They will be dazzled by a sign they will see speeding into the city for five milliseconds and instantly become Demons and you are telling me I'm joking?

My point was that you said that migrants won't have any interest in football yet Carlton still give free tickets to asylum seekers. I am guessing that they see potential in them becoming supporters one day.

I don't mind you making your point (and you are entitled to it) but do you need to be a condescending ass?

The best point you have made (you have spent most of your time trying to tear down others ideas without offering any yourself) is that this probably won't be a starter anyway as TOOT pointed out.

 

I am an employee of The University of Melbourne at the Sport Department here.

I can't go into too much detail, but there have been official meetings between the club and the University. These have mainly been around research and an education partnership for players and administration (like the Uni has with the Melbourne Rebels) - as far as I'm aware there's never been any proposal or thought broached about moving the club here and building a facility, which would obviously be a huge investment. I don't know who thought of 'the move' but it definitely hasn't been on the agenda.

Someone making a mountain out of a molehill I think. I just can't see it happening.

You appear to be on the money Toot 182.

No surprise here that the HUN has taken a small amount of information and turned it into the Bible.

The only surprise to me is that the item was not written by Robbo.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Fremantle

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons return to the MCG wounded, undermanned and desperate. Still searching for their first win of the season, Melbourne faces a daunting task against the Fremantle Dockers. With key pillars missing at both ends of the ground, the Dees must find a way to rise above the adversity and ignite their season before it slips way beyond reach. Will today be the spark that turns it all around, or are we staring down the barrel of a 0–6 start?

      • Haha
    • 66 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Fremantle

    A month is a long time in AFL football. The proof of this is in the current state of the two teams contesting against each other early this Saturday afternoon at the MCG. It’s hard to fathom that when Melbourne and Fremantle kicked off the 2025 season, the former looked like being a major player in this year’s competition after it came close to beating one of the favourites in the GWS Giants while the latter was smashed by Geelong to the tune of 78 points and looked like rubbish. Fast forward to today and the Demons are low on confidence and appear panic stricken as their winless streak heads towards an even half dozen and pressure mounts on the coach and team leadership.  Meanwhile, the Dockers have recovered their composure and now sit in the top eight. They are definitely on the up and up and look most likely winners this weekend against a team which they have recently dominated and which struggles to find enough passages to the goals to trouble the scorers. And with that, Fremantle will head to the MCG, feeling very good about itself after demolishing Richmond in the Barossa Valley with Josh Treacy coming off a six goal haul and facing up to a Melbourne defence already without Jake Lever and a shaky Steven May needing to pass a fitness test just to make it onto the field of play. 

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 06

    The Easter Round kicks off in style with a Thursday night showdown between Brisbane and Collingwood, as both sides look to solidify their spots inside the Top 4 early in the season. Good Friday brings a double-header, with Carlton out to claim consecutive wins when they face the struggling Kangaroos, while later that night the Eagles host the Bombers in Perth, still chasing their first victory of the year. Saturday features another marquee clash as the resurgent Crows look to rebound from back-to-back losses against a formidable GWS outfit. That evening, all eyes will be on Marvel Stadium where Damien Hardwick returns to face his old side—the Tigers—coaching the Suns at a ground he's never hidden his disdain for. Sunday offers two crucial contests where the prize is keeping touch with the Top 8. First, Sydney and Port Adelaide go head-to-head, followed by a fierce battle between the Bulldogs and the Saints. Then, Easter Monday delivers the traditional clash between two bitter rivals, both desperate for a win to stay in touch with the top end of the ladder. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 201 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Essendon

    What were they thinking? I mean by “they” the coaching panel and team selectors who chose the team to play against an opponent who, like Melbourne, had made a poor start to the season and who they appeared perfectly capable of beating in what was possibly the last chance to turn the season around.It’s no secret that the Demons’ forward line is totally dysfunctional, having opened the season barely able to average sixty points per game which means there has been no semblance of any system from the team going forward into attack. Nevertheless, on Saturday night at the Adelaide Oval in one of the Gather Round showcase games, Melbourne, with Max Gawn dominating the hit outs against a depleted Essendon ruck resulting from Nick Bryan’s early exit, finished just ahead in clearances won and found itself inside the 50 metre arc 51 times to 43. The end result was a final score that had the Bombers winning 15.6 (96) to 8.9 (57). On balance, one could expect this to result in a two or three goal win, but in this case, it translated into a six and a half goal defeat because they only managed to convert eight times or 11.68% of their entries. The Bombers more than doubled that. On Thursday night at the same ground, the losing team Adelaide managed to score 100 points from almost the same number of times inside 50.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 63 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 477 replies
    Demonland