Jump to content

Featured Replies

23 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

We fought to the end. Good game, we have the building blocks to make another run at he playoffs next year. D should get better, Corrum might take over from Williams if he cant stop fumbling, I think a Inside linebacker for the run game, maybe a centre, Limmer did well but iirc its not his natural position.

O-line could use improvement but everyone's could. In inside LB like what Wagner was meant to be would be handy, a nice rookie would compliment guys like Verse. 

More WR depth would be good too. This draft doesn't look super deep at receiver but you've proven you can get late steals.

Right now you'd be favourite to top the west again but we'll re-visit after free agency/draft. 

 
8 minutes ago, layzie said:

Was bound to leave for a HC job.

I do worry about the Lions. As a team gets more expensive you either need an elite coach or an elite QB. I think Dan Campbell has done an amazing job and seems to be a great man manager but I do feel a lot of his success is down to his coordinators. 

Jared Goff has had a great season and is definitely in the good QB category. I would not say elite though. 

Will be interesting to see what off-season they have. 

I still think their D when healthy will wreck face, and as the Rams did with Goff, run the ball (lions prob the best 1-2 punch at RB) and play action and also have the D get them the ball back often and in good spots.

Think back to 2017, Kupp and Gurley were both great for most of the year until injured and ultimately, Kupp missed the rest of the year and Gurley's knee was cooked. and we still were in the SB until the end due to the D holding the pats. I still believe that of Kupp and a Healthy Gurley play we win that SB comfortably.

3 minutes ago, layzie said:

O-line could use improvement but everyone's could. In inside LB like what Wagner was meant to be would be handy, a nice rookie would compliment guys like Verse. 

More WR depth would be good too. This draft doesn't look super deep at receiver but you've proven you can get late steals.

Right now you'd be favourite to top the west again but we'll re-visit after free agency/draft. 

Well I reckon Kupp is cut, has 29.8m hit and about to hit 32, I think they will try and retain Robinson and let Atwell walk.

Whittington who we got last year I think looks good, but they didnt give him much of a go other than when injuries occured, but he has speed and some size.

I think a vet ILB and a centre would be high on priority.

Also not 100% they bring back Stafford going my media talk, but that I think is just talk, I mean who do you replace him with?

 
2 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

I still think their D when healthy will wreck face, and as the Rams did with Goff, run the ball (lions prob the best 1-2 punch at RB) and play action and also have the D get them the ball back often and in good spots.

Think back to 2017, Kupp and Gurley were both great for most of the year until injured and ultimately, Kupp missed the rest of the year and Gurley's knee was cooked. and we still were in the SB until the end due to the D holding the pats. I still believe that of Kupp and a Healthy Gurley play we win that SB comfortably.

No doubt, healthy D will be the barometer for them. I think it's a big time for Campbell though, great coaches have great coordinators leave for better jobs, can Dan work the magic?

I think if Kupp alone played they would have won it, you just can't put a price on those receivers who find that yard of space in big games. 

Yeah the new OC will be interesting for the lions.

Saleh has a second interview with the jags, Hope he does well, he seemed a scape goat to the jets debacle 2024 edition


5 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Well I reckon Kupp is cut, has 29.8m hit and about to hit 32, I think they will try and retain Robinson and let Atwell walk.

Whittington who we got last year I think looks good, but they didnt give him much of a go other than when injuries occured, but he has speed and some size.

I think a vet ILB and a centre would be high on priority.

Also not 100% they bring back Stafford going my media talk, but that I think is just talk, I mean who do you replace him with?

Rozeboom is a free agent as well I believe? Thought he had a good season and you'd want to get him signed.

I don't think you'd be doing better than Stafford under centre next season. Unless they fancy guys like Darnold, Fields or feel like making a play for Rodgers. Nup. 

2 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Yeah the new OC will be interesting for the lions.

Saleh has a second interview with the jags, Hope he does well, he seemed a scape goat to the jets debacle 2024 edition

We've asked him to come back as DC. 

Pack it in Robert, this HC game is tough. 

Posting more than Fedex right now but just a reminder that the College Football National Championship is on today at 11:30am on ESPN between heavyweights Notre Dame and Ohio State.

The Buckeyes are favourites but I'm on the Irish today. Hopefully can sneak a glimpse at work.

 
2 hours ago, layzie said:

Rozeboom is a free agent as well I believe? Thought he had a good season and you'd want to get him signed.

I don't think you'd be doing better than Stafford under centre next season. Unless they fancy guys like Darnold, Fields or feel like making a play for Rodgers. Nup. 

We have about 14, some like Rozeboom will be interesting, he misses some easy tackles, then makes other plays, I think price will really matter there, or who else is available cheaper.

 

I dont like any of those names, tbh I think if McVay moves on from Stafford it will be for a Stroud type QB

2 hours ago, layzie said:

We've asked him to come back as DC. 

Pack it in Robert, this HC game is tough. 

Ha ha, I reckon he wants to stay a HC and shove it up the Jets.

59 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

We have about 14, some like Rozeboom will be interesting, he misses some easy tackles, then makes other plays, I think price will really matter there, or who else is available cheaper.

 

I dont like any of those names, tbh I think if McVay moves on from Stafford it will be for a Stroud type QB

Ha ha, I reckon he wants to stay a HC and shove it up the Jets.

Or Russell Wilson if you feel like completely overhauling your offense!


52 minutes ago, layzie said:

Or Russell Wilson if you feel like completely overhauling your offense!

Out of all named I'd rather a rookie or re sign Jimmy G, not that I want him starting either.

But unless we trade up for a QB (hugely unlikely) I can't see us not going with Stafford.

Edited by Gorgoroth

58 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Out of all named I'd rather a rookie or re sign Jimmy G, not that I want him starting either.

But unless we trade up for a QB (hugely unlikely) I can't see us not going with Stafford.

I'd definitely stay with Stafford for now. You can do a hell of a lot worse. 

@layzie I reckon we will try and draft a QB in the draft who can run around a bit. 
I think McVay is itching to have a QB who can move.

40 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

@layzie I reckon we will try and draft a QB in the draft who can run around a bit. 
I think McVay is itching to have a QB who can move.

Dual threat QBs are the hot topic.

I haven't paid much attention to the Class of College QBs this year, will have to get our heads around it as I would also like to draft someone to sit. 

2 hours ago, layzie said:

Dual threat QBs are the hot topic.

I haven't paid much attention to the Class of College QBs this year, will have to get our heads around it as I would also like to draft someone to sit. 

My mob have clearly decided that mobile QB is the way to go, benching Cousins & starting Penix Jnr with 3 week to go… I still can’t get my head around the Kirk experiment, the amount of money was absurd for a 36 year old coming off an Achilles. The cap hit (even though they say they’ll bring him back at a back up 😂) is going to restrict our roster for years to come, they need to beef up the Defense but will be hamstrung 

Edited by JV7


On 20/01/2025 at 17:30, Macca said:

Leaderboard Tipping Comp*

19 - Clintosaurus,  JV7

18 - Macca

17 - layzie

13 - ElDiablo14

12 - Dr. Gonzo,  DemonDave

11 - Gorgoroth

9 - BDA

Still 22 points up for grabs (next week 3 + 3 & 3 +3 and for the SB 5 + 5) 

 

@BDA @Dr. Gonzo @Clintosaurus

@DemonDave  @layzie @Gorgoroth

On 20/01/2025 at 17:23, Macca said:

7.00am Monday - (+5.0) Washington @ (-5.0) Philadelphia 

10.30am Monday - (+1.5) Buffalo @ (-1.5) Kansas City 

 

KC 1-6

Washington 7-12

Don't want to see a Chiefs 3peat but don't want to see the Bills win either, as a Jets fan they really [censored] me as a team every time we play them. So come on NFC, would prefer to see the Commanders win the SB but could handle Philly even though Sirianni seems like a [censored].

2 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

KC 1-6

Washington 7-12

Don't want to see a Chiefs 3peat but don't want to see the Bills win either, as a Jets fan they really [censored] me as a team every time we play them. So come on NFC, would prefer to see the Commanders win the SB but could handle Philly even though Sirianni seems like a [censored].

Ha ha, so commanders or a sour taste will be had 😄

Edited by Gorgoroth


11 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

Ha ha, so commanders or a sour taste will be had 😄

Could handle Philly but KC or Bills 🤮

I think it's the Bills year though, Allen feels like he's gone to another level this year

 

I too think it's time for the Bills. Defense looks balanced, Allen on fire. I'm pulling for them.

Don't know if anyone caught the National Championship on Tuesday but unfortunately the Buckeyes were just a bit too strong for the Fighting Irish on the night. 

I've always found Notre Dame to be similar to the Dees in the sense of being a sleeping giant so it would have been nice to see them break through. Haven't won it since the Lou Holtz days in the 80s. 

The other annoying thing is seeing Mcguire jr's name plastered all over the news. I just don't have time for the way Aus covers the American Football!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Like
    • 47 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies