What topic? Oh yeah, Darling coming to our club? Do we have a no alledged dckheads policy too?

Collingwood seem to survive thrive with plenty of them

The bain of my life is my keyboard. Tap tapping away only to look back and half a dozen letters are missing.

Am I the only one this happens to ? Yes, I should replace the keyboard. But I hasten to add that Daffy should be spelt Daffy.

No, happens to me all the time. Re: Daffey Daffy....see what I mean !

Hahah i'll wait for proof that he's a [censored], and if he is available at #12 and we pass, either he is a [censored], or we are. Eithe way there's going to be a [censored].

You stated that "experts" had Darling sliding. You were then asked who these "experts" were. Your answer was Daffy (couldn't care how he spells his [censored] name) and Quayle.

We've established that Quayle has earmarked Darling as an earlyish pick by her suggestion that the Eagles would have him therabouts at pick 4.

We've also established that you speak sh.it. Often.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/104173/default.aspx

Authors here listed as staff writers. Darling mentioned in relation to Carlton (pick 18) & Sydney (pick 21).

Not that I claim this as substantiating any facts mentioned earlier. It does indicate further evidence of a predicted Darling slide and the potential that he will be available should the MFC be interested.

Again, I hope he does and that MFC are.

Edited October 17, 201014 yr by Demon Hill

Yawn.

You had me at yawn with your suggestion of Darling & Bate being anywhere near similar.

You had me at yawn with your suggestion of Darling & Bate being anywhere near similar.

I'm not surprised considering your depth of understanding is rivalled by most puddles.

There's quite a bit of debate re "best available" and "type". Another dimension is "sure thing" and "X-factor". At pick 12 do we go for someone who will in all likelihood be a solid AFL player or go a bit more "California or bust"? I reckon picks in this range start to get into the conservative safety first range. too early to risk stuffing up but not early enough to get an absolutely guaranteed player. You've got your Nathan Jones and your Cyril Rioli.

Edited October 17, 201014 yr by old55

Btw, has anyone told you lately what a [censored] you are ?

Has anyone called E25 the equivalent of a [censored]?

Now THAT is a rhetorical question...

Not a critique, E25. Just an observation...

I'm sick of all this rhetoric.

Can someone just ask a question I'm allowed to answer?

Btw, anyone know where I send my application for the defensive line coach position..?

The same place you sent your Cameron Cloke hypothesis

I'm not surprised considering your depth of understanding is rivalled by most puddles.

That's a pretty clever line.

Where did you pinch it from and why the hell did you bother replying while Jurrah was going nuts in China?!!

Back on topic (if I may) I suspect that a number of clubs including our own will shy away from Darling on the basis of the no dckheads rule.

With respect to the no dckheads rule #2a. Being involved in an alleged "sex romp", does this: -

a/ activate the no dckheads rule - therefore ruling him out of consideration for drafting in the ND if available

b/ mean that we have no dckheads on our current list ?

From what I've seen of him and read (excluding off field activities*) he looks a handy player WJ.

Finally, I think this might be worth discussing. Particularly as many here look to add a "need" / "best available" with pick 12. My point is if he is available ( & regarded at the best available) when pick 12 comes around, should we pick Darling up instead of turning a blind eye because of a reported off field activity ?

* Does this confirm a poor character; one whom may carry extra baggage ? For I'm not entirely sure.

Imo the "sex romp" is no real indication of anything.

Not necessarily an indication of a bad character.

I can't think of many teenage boys that wouldn't engage in the same behaviour if given half the chance.

The incident with him being assaulted worries me a lot more, ie. how it effects him psychologically going forward.

Also that there were other unconfirmed whispers of dckhead behaviour prior to him getting belted, making it not too much of a surprise.

Imo the "sex romp" is no real indication of anything.

Not necessarily an indication of a bad character.

I can't think of many teenage boys that wouldn't engage in the same behaviour if given half the chance.

Tell me about it. The guy likes sex......................stop the presses

Just came across this little snippet in an interview with Emma Quayle on BF:

3. The Slider v The Bolter - Regarding Jack Darling, do you feel his height will restrict him holding down a key position and where she feels he may be drafted, and who might be interested?

Jayden Pitt could be the bolter this year as an underdeveloped player with a big upside ala JMP last year. What are her thoughts on him and could he become a top 10 proposition post Draft Camp?

I don’t think top 10 for Jayden – maybe top 20. He is a very smart and instinctive player though, not unlike Fyfe in that way. A natural.

Re Jack, it’s so hard to pick at this stage. Maybe Eagles would look at him, same with Brisbane, but I’m not convinced of either. Speaking to him at the draft camp, he was adamant that he could play midfield and seemed frustrated that he had been pigeon holed as an undersized key forward. That said, there are some offfield issues that concern people about Jack, and I’m sure he would have been grilled about them at the draft camp. He is obviously recovering from a head injury too – clubs would be going right through that information and making sure he’s going to make a full recovery before deciding whether to go for him or not.

It seems Darling sees himself as being more than capable of being a midfielder/forward in the same mould as I think a lot of our supporters see Tapscott fitting in.

Also, I think the head injuries will cause him to slide, possibly well beyond our first pick.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=767053

Just came across this little snippet in an interview with Emma Quayle on BF:

It seems Darling sees himself as being more than capable of being a midfielder/forward in the same mould as I think a lot of our supporters see Tapscott fitting in.

Also, I think the head injuries will cause him to slide, possibly well beyond our first pick.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=767053

Yes, I remember reading that also and remember he said he could play midfield too, but I read it more that he was frustrated at being "pigeon holed" as a key forward when he feels his midfield capabilities are being overlooked. Not that he thought he was more suited to being a middy.

In any case I think you are right about 12 being a tad too early at the end of the day. If we had a pick 17/18 this year and assuming he passes medicals/psychos etc I think we'd snap him up.. alas we don't.

I think getting a clean bill by the shrinks & medicos would have him going earlier than our pick.

The uncertainty about his recovery is a big part of what will have him sliding.

It seems Darling sees himself as being more than capable of being a midfielder/forward in the same mould as I think a lot of our supporters see Tapscott fitting in.

Darling is very different type of player to Tappscott.

190cm is sufficiently tall to be key position forward if he's talented enough (Fev 191cm, Neitz 191cm, Carey 190cm, Pav 191cm). He has the build of a key forward as well. Tapscott is a stocky built midfielder who has good goal sense so can play at half forward.

I don't think Tapscott is a mid. Not yet at least.

A HFF right now.

And I know he is 10cm shorter than Darling, but both aggressive, built HFFs who throw their weight around and can go into the middle.

190cm is short for a KPF and I won't budge on that.

I'm not saying he's not capable of playing that role, but he is still the absolute minimum height to be considered a KPF.

I think getting a clean bill by the shrinks & medicos would have him going earlier than our pick.

The uncertainty about his recovery is a big part of what will have him sliding.

Do you think this percieved dikcheadness will have a bearing on where he goes?

Do you think this percieved dikcheadness will have a bearing on where he goes?

Yeah, but that's part of the shrink's analysis.

I'm sure they do all personality profiles, etc at the Combine.

It will tell a story.

190cm is short for a KPF and I won't budge on that.

I'm not saying he's not capable of playing that role, but he is still the absolute minimum height to be considered a KPF.

What's a KPF? Is Jurrah a KPF?

Does it mean you can take a contested mark - Green, Petterd and Sylvia can take contested marks in the forward line, are they KPFs?

How many KPFs do you need? How many is too many?

What's a KPF? Is Jurrah a KPF?

Does it mean you can take a contested mark - Green, Petterd and Sylvia can take contested marks in the forward line, are they KPFs?

How many KPFs do you need? How many is too many?

you just wrinkled my brain

you just wrinkled my brain

given your average post word count of 2 you can ill afford that. Contribute or pack up the sniper rifle.

given your average post word count of 2 you can ill afford that. Contribute or pack up the sniper rifle.

.... i was being serious, a thought provoking message was that one