Jump to content

meh..

Featured Replies

Posted

so who we playing next week??

nar in all seriouse im not even angry or phithy.. we had a young side out there and i think its gud for them to play against a quality side like geelong. they will kno wats its like know to come up against bigger more faster players

i still think our future is gud with maric valenti aussie morton martin and so on.. keep going boys ur doing a vey good job!

go dees

 
so who we playing next week??

nar in all seriouse im not even angry or phithy.. we had a young side out there and i think its gud for them to play against a quality side like geelong. they will kno wats its like know to come up against bigger more faster players

i still think our future is gud with maric valenti aussie morton martin and so on.. keep going boys ur doing a vey good job!

go dees

I agree, I was bloody worried when we hadn't scored for the first 40 mins but i reckon they did alright after that, Geelong are just the best team I have seen for a LONG while, better than the bummers in 2000 and lions in 2001-3

 

if anyone can beat geelong this year , it will be an upset one of the best playing sides ive ever seen ,even close tyo rivalling hawks in the 80s

i knew we were gonig to get wiped out on this one

keeping things in perspective a result like this was always on the cards. we are a developing side to begin with let alone the players we had missing, who i need not list as we all know who they are. players that stood out for me were maric, valenti, buckley, junior, pj was ok as was warnock and martin given the constant pressure. oh and jeff white stood out, but for other reasons............


Not that it would of mattered but tonight

We missed Brocks drive in midfield, Rivers' calming influence down back, Robbo's ability to kick a goal just when we need & Moloneys driving kicks - long and direct.

I agree, I was bloody worried when we hadn't scored for the first 40 mins but i reckon they did alright after that, Geelong are just the best team I have seen for a LONG while, better than the bummers in 2000 and lions in 2001-3

I agree with that. Can't remember Lions or Bombers destroying teams to the extent Geelong can.

It's hard to believe there is so much difference between two AFL teams as shown tonight.

I agree, I was bloody worried when we hadn't scored for the first 40 mins but i reckon they did alright after that, Geelong are just the best team I have seen for a LONG while, better than the bummers in 2000 and lions in 2001-3

I'd agree with that. But we do forget quickly. Brisbane were awesome at full strength '01-'03.

i knew we were gonig to get wiped out on this one

I was optimistic all week, until I saw the teams run out tonight. (It was the heart). Geelong just looked so much bigger in their bodies.

We missed Brocks drive in midfield, Rivers' calming influence down back, Robbo's ability to kick a goal just when we need & Moloneys driving kicks - long and direct.

Exactly my thoughts driving home. And Garland. Warnock disappointed me early tonight, but looked better later in the game.

 
I'd agree with that. But we do forget quickly. Brisbane were awesome at full strength '01-'03.

I was optimistic all week, until I saw the teams run out tonight. (It was the heart). Geelong just looked so much bigger in their bodies.

Exactly my thoughts driving home. And Garland. Warnock disappointed me early tonight, but looked better later in the game.

I like Warnock but he has alot to improve on. To be a good defender in the modern age game, you have to have just as good an offensive and rebounding game as your defensive one. Being able to spoil and or hold your man just isnt enough and this is all Warnock's giving us really.

To me he plays a lot like Tom Harley and could really develop into a handy key position backman.

i still think our future is gud with maric valenti aussie morton martin and so on.. keep going boys ur doing a vey good job!

go dees

I'm really struggling to find any cause for optimism in our up and coming crop of players. Sorry to be a downer but the likes of maric, valenti, aussie, morton and martin just reek to high heaven of mediocrity. We don't have one decent up and coming key position prospect on our list. Not one. Garland is Carrol v2.0, Warnock is Wheatley 2.0, Frawley is Bell 2.0, Morton is Bruce 2.0, Maric is Yze 2.0, martin is Andrew Gaze 2.0, I don't see anything in our under 21 list to get truly excited about.


I'm really struggling to find any cause for optimism in our up and coming crop of players. Sorry to be a downer but the likes of maric, valenti, aussie, morton and martin just reek to high heaven of mediocrity.

Says more about you than them.

I'm really struggling to find any cause for optimism in our up and coming crop of players. Sorry to be a downer but the likes of maric, valenti, aussie, morton and martin just reek to high heaven of mediocrity. We don't have one decent up and coming key position prospect on our list. Not one. Garland is Carrol v2.0, Warnock is Wheatley 2.0, Frawley is Bell 2.0, Morton is Bruce 2.0, Maric is Yze 2.0, martin is Andrew Gaze 2.0, I don't see anything in our under 21 list to get truly excited about.

I have to say, with no offence intended, that those comparisons are pathetic. Garland has already shown in 15 or so games that he has miles more talent than Carroll ever did. He can read the play and had some decent skills too. Warnock is nothing like Wheatley. Maric showed last night that he can play either midfield or in the forward line, and after only 3 games he's already adapting well to AFL standard. How can you be so quick to condemn Maric and Morton? When was the last time you went to a game?

I'm really struggling to find any cause for optimism in our up and coming crop of players. Sorry to be a downer but the likes of maric, valenti, aussie, morton and martin just reek to high heaven of mediocrity. We don't have one decent up and coming key position prospect on our list. Not one. Garland is Carrol v2.0, Warnock is Wheatley 2.0, Frawley is Bell 2.0, Morton is Bruce 2.0, Maric is Yze 2.0, martin is Andrew Gaze 2.0, I don't see anything in our under 21 list to get truly excited about.

Wallowing MFC supporters, exactly what we need. Your 'downer' is a result of what happened on Friday.

Half the team on Friday were not in our best 22, and our 'best 22' is not that great at all, so it's understandable that side got obilterated.

Not acceptable, but understandable.

What is not understandable is that attitude towards our youngsters. I have seen enough to get excited about Martin, Valenti, Buckley, Dunn, Bate, Jones, Batram, Garland, Petterd, Wonna, Morton, and Maric. And I can't wait to see more of Cheney, Grimes, McNamara, our top 2 pick this draft and our other two top 20 picks.

I know that not all will come on, but I struggle to remember such young talent at the club. And if you disagree, then that is your right. But say it after the Brisbane game, and we'd take it more seriously.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 171 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 46 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 328 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Sad
      • Love
    • 31 replies