Sydee

I thought Goody said in his presser that Lever rolled the same ankle twice in the GWS game and they would have to wait to see how he recovered - Id say they are taking a conservative approach again with him

Not sure if you saw Mitch Brown's last match on the weekend but from my perspective it was certainly not a performance that would have the selectors discussing him for AFL selection His previous match against his former team (Essendon) he started ok then was hit behind the play just after 1/4 time and never returned The game I think you are referring to was against Sandringham where he kicked 7 goals playing in a team that won convincingly and he was opposed to a first year kid that is nowhere near ready for AFL selection In short - no I think he is still behind BBB, TMac, and Weid as the tall options in F50. I would also suggest he could fall behind JVR by the end of the season if Van Rooyen continues to improve

Having watched the game he didn't look right from the first bounce - seemed to be struggling just jogging and moving around I would guess he was feeling unwell rather than any sort of physical injury - if so very surprising he actually took the field If he was in fact "sick" and not injured that may explain why there has been no injury report

Yes apparently did well but I only saw the final 1/4 Joel Smith 7 kicks 6 handballs 13 disposals 3 marks 4 tackles 56 dream team points

I thought the umpire (or one of them) said that the 50 was awarded against Clayton Oliver for something he said when the free was paid I don't think it was awarded for simply having arms outstretched or raised

I’m confused is Trac playing or not ?

Seems to me a few people here think GWS will be an easy kill and we can rest players, tinker with positions and gift younger players a game before they are ready etc. I know they aren't fielding the same team as the one that beat us on the same ground last year but they do have some very good players and on their day are a tough opponent - there seems to be a touch of over confidence emerging

Not mentioned in the best players last round - you might have to use some imagination or just pay up like the rest of us 😀

Count yourself as a very lucky supporter 😀

Josh obviously thinks Jacko is so versatile he can play about 4 positions on the ground simultaneously He will have to because at this rate we can't afford to field another 21 players

I think we need to be a little bit careful about reading too much into Max's comments about Smith / May I really think Max's comments were largely tongue in cheek and trying to be a bit funny - he is not going to publicly can a team mate Of course May is going to say he prefers Level down in the D50 supporting him - who wouldn't ? Lever is one of the best defenders going around and a real general helping to get the other backs into the right position - that by default makes May's task easier

Agree - my comment was in response to @one_demon saying that Petty and Smith are defenders and therefore they wont be tried up forward I was simply pointing out that originally TMac was considered a defender too and look what happened Personally don't see any reason why Smith or Petty couldn't be an option in F50 if the need was there and there wasn't a space for either in the D50. Anyway, I'm not a selector so just my opinion happy for others to disagree

Ok - wasn't TMac firmly in the camp at some point ?

Interesting idea I have been giving some thought to this as well but less so with Tomlinson as I dont think he has the pace or the overhead marking ability to be really successful in that forward role When our list is fit the depth in the back half is better than forwards which means that we could potentially look either Petty or Smith as possible alternatives to Weid or TMac if neither are performing Smith in particular has some weapons that could make him a difficult match up inside F50. Quick, can take marks overhead and not a terrible kick. He has been tried there briefly before with some success. Given our backline depth I was a little surprised he was training exclusively in a defensive role preseason. Hard to see either of them having less impact on the game than say Weid's last game

I’m pleased a few others can see upside in Laurie because personally Based on what I’ve seen to date I’m struggling to understand why we drafted him Hopefully he proves me wrong and I finish up with a carton of eggs on my face

From the little bit I’ve seen of JVR he is a potential replacement for any of the taller forward options other than Fritta of those it’s most likely he would replace either Weed or TMac - however he needs to consistently perform at Casey and build his knowledge of the game plan before he would be considered an option imo I do think he has a bright future though

Right there is your problem - nobody knows what he can consistently deliver because even when he has given consecutive games he failed to lock down a position - so we really have no clear idea what his "known form" is I'm not saying he doesn't deserve another crack next week just that we should not be reconfiguring our whole forward structure around him - he needs to find a way to work with any structure , any week My personal view is that he looks a significantly better player when allowed to run onto the ball (leading with space in front) - he is very easily pushed aside by key defenders and is never going to succeed relying on contested marking. If there is away to free up that space without compromising the ability of other forwards to contribute then great. Fritta seems to be able to make this work with astute timing for his leads and clever positioning around the drop of the ball. One of the big challenges for Sam is to ensure that each time he takes the field he walks off having made a meaningful contribution as is the case with the whole squad. This doesn't always have to be measured on goals kicked but the gap between Sam's better games and poorer performances remains significant

Was that another one of the games we didn't get out of first gear ? 🙂

Really? I'd say he would be extremely foolish to make statements like this unless he was very confident he was on the money I am particularly encouraged by the comment that recent signings have taken slightly less to keep the team together - that is exactly what we need to see happen across the board

Here's my 2 cents May - much better performance Harmes - reward for effort Petracca - hard tag again Jackson - solid game again Viney - hard as nails Lever - welcome back Rick Spargo - not his best Brayshaw - Mr reliable again Gawn - destroyed his opposition Oliver - well below best Langdon - absolute running machine Bowey - still hasn't lost Tomlinson - not yet convinced Jordon - really good game Rivers - question on fitness TMac - second best forward Weid - never got going Hunt - clubs best golfer ANB - second efforts great Fritta - some good cameos Sparrow - clone of Viney Kozzie - love his pressure

Angus epitomises the team first attitude that has turned this club into a premiership outfit There is nothing I'm seeing that suggests he has the slightest interest in seeking other opportunities particularly if they are motivated by self interest - that would seem to be very out of character He has a great rapport with his captain and his team mates - he will get paid well because he deserves to. Despite the media dribble that he would prefer to be playing midfield minutes the playing group, coaches and supporters all value his contribution just the same as if he was racking up 30 possessions in the middle. The penny has dropped for this group - it isn't about personal glory - "team first" is the mantra, if you are part of the team (including those on the list not able to crack into the 1's) your are an integral part of whatever success comes This "team first" mantra will be tested in the next year or two when rivals will try to poach players. This group should want to keep the band together - there is great chemistry and culture which is not easily replicated - Yes players need to be paid well and I'm sure they will but team success and the chance of creating a period of sustained success is worth so much more than a few extra dollars or personal glory imho

Interesting observations Last nights match was the first time (possibly ever) that I never for one second thought we could lose the game such was the dominance of our defensive structure behind the ball I agree that our forward connection was NQR and at times it did seem players were just bombing the ball into the F50 without much thought. It certainly made life difficult for our forwards who when they did get separation from their defenders were regularly let down by kicks that were not to their advantage. Several times we had forwards running back to an open goal only to have passes fall short allowing Port players to intercept mark - a well weighted kick would have led to a very different outcome.

I'm not defending Weed as I think you could tell by his body language after the game that he feels he has let another opportunity slip. With BB available he will unfortunately find it difficult to retain his spot However, the way the game was played it was never going to be easy for him to have much influence. Port flooded back and did everything possible to suffocate forward 50 entries, but unlike us they did this by shear weight of numbers (rather than very well executed zone defence). When they did win possession it was followed by a series dinky sideways kicks that achieved nothing and they invariably found they had nothing forward of centre to kick to. It was actually quite comical to watch them fail over and over again. Even the commentators (either Watson or Burgoyne) said that it was a complete waste of time and could never threaten to win the game with approach. TMac undoubtedly had more influence and impact in the game than Weed so it would be difficult to find a reason to omit him before Sam. I'm staggered people are suggesting Pickett should be dropped - you can forget about that happening whilst he continues to deliver the sort of "team first" pressure acts we are seeing from him. I was impressed last night to hear from every player interviewed that its a total team first attitude that is the focus. If anyone doesn't want to play that way I suspect they would be out pretty quickly.

I'd argue Smith is not a "smaller" option - yes he is 3 cm shorter but far more capable of high marking and spoiling overhead marks than Tomlinson. He is also considerably faster and more agile than Tomlinson. The benefit with Smith is that he has the capacity to play on a range of opponents from small to tall effectively. Is he perfect - clearly no but he will continue to improve imo if given more game time

Next AFL player pay deal must consider revenue drop: McLachlan (msn.com) I wonder how this commentary influences (if at all) the ongoing negotiations on Luke's and other contract extensions Also includes a suggestion that the length of contracts may shorten