Demonsterative

Use of capitals in all organisation computer policies can be construed as an attack. I transfered that thought to your post. I also will concede that was not your intention either

You need to stop reading posts like they are an attack BH. I WASN'T referring Barry to Bennell as a player either. I was referring to the point being made that Barry was being reported to be "training the house down" like Bennell had been previously. I'll contain my excitement until the results are shown on game day. Maybe it was because I confused you to Fan? Its an easy mistake to make.

Agreed. Everything about this saga is boring.

Some one (I think BH) likened Dom to Bennell in this thread (on the training track). I decided to contain my excitement after that. Maybe Jason Taylor had some input into the drafting of Dom. I'm sure the only way Neeld would recruit another skinny under sized player is if he trusted the word of the recruiter who was watching him, or knew of him.

C'mon Stuie! Your steam rolling this Thread and getting way off topic. Back To Dom Barry

Was CC in the box in the Richmond game? Maybe he had a few beers to add to his curry and the coaching group could not concerntrate from the stench he created. Maybe Bailey wants the tapes from the coaching box to show the investigation team the noises CC was making. I believe this to be the real reason 47 moves were made that day. Everyone was high on CC's Tandoori aftermath

Paul Johnson

Rhino, This has gone on for 6 months. The damage is far wider than the investigation itself. It has gone as far as the club and individuals hiring legal advise. Its more than a media beat up, as you origanally thought. You will fight this to the death, if you are true to form. Even sometimes you get things wrong.

I think RR must be a drama teacher. He seems to call many out for being melodramatic. I also remember RR calling many melodramatic when the tanking investigation started. He thought this issue to be a beat up and would not go anywhere.

I though the article to be a transcript from WYL's book.

What? Just Titan?

Is it the great man himself. Jimmy Stynes?

I rate Brown as a coach and hope Dawes will have a break out season. Clark was a revelation 2012 when most did not rate him (as a forward). I hope Dawes follows suit.

What I find so offensive with some posts, is that some back CW and her informants/people before they back the club. Its a simple as that really. Some may have had a close liking or affilliation to previous administrations and they may have a bad taste in his mouth for the way they were treated, but whatever axe these ppl have to grind is not important. Time to get back to why you support the club. Its about a passion and love for the game and club. I see this as akin to a family member. You love them first, flaws and all. The rest is not as important!!! Yes, I have read many bias posts supporting the club. They hang on to information in support of the club because they love the club, worts and all. Some posters also has a history of attacking the club. This issue, this current administration and Mark Neeld are other topics that I have read Fan talk about and he has spoken about these areas in a negative light. Even when backing Neelds change of the list recently, Fan said he will come back at Neeld if the changes fail. I say, back the club because you love it. If the club is guilty, so are others and it would be completely unfair for the MFC to be hung out to dry. CW may be good at her job (compared to others), but she is attcking something I love and therefore I will not back her. simple Having said this, I think the club has not broken any AFL policy/rules. I would be more than happy for the club to ask the AFL for compensation for the club being taken through the ringers. Mud Sticks!

Early last year WYL stated he was a Drug and Alcohol worker at some stage of his life too. A news room and the AOD field dont seem to have a common link, but like many, ppl change careers. Sorry Stuie, off topic again

Ablett jnr has done very well IMO

Hmmm. not sure about that

To be fair the OP has contributed to 15 of the posts I agree, I cant believe Im contributing, but how else can you stop the incessant posts of the OP. Will the penny ever drop???

Time for you to smoke a herb or two stuie

I think you should have stopped after your first fullstop. A more apt way of describing yourself

No WYL, It will reflect his good play/games. Umpires do not take away votes for things like excessive swearing (a blight on character IMO).

I seriously doubt Neeld works on a calendar year. He would have started this year way before the season proper ended in 2012. What is pass mark on Neeld this year? 8 wins with improved efforts/games against the top 4 teams. If the team wins quaters or dominates periods of the game against the likes of Hawthorn, Collingwood, West Coast (in Perth) and Sydney, I'll be very happy. It means we can match it with best and we are heading towards a game plan that will stand up in finals. Consistency will come later on.

If Moloney pulls out another 20 brownlow vote year with the Lions, I suspect he will get a mention or two on this site. Probably by the ones who say he is an ex player now therefore irrelevant.

WYL, again the question (as Jose posted) is asked, who are you comparing Jack too. Even in an under performing year Jack averaged a smidgen under 20 disposals. I believe Dane Swan had average years before his break out year. Isn't a little too much to expect a break our year when he has only played 3? Grimes had a good year IMO, He stoop up as captain in a few games and player every round.

I suggest you re-visit Jacks 2nd year. He had some very good games particulary given it was his 2nd year as an AFL player