binman

Was thinking the same thing. They flooded our forward line and got their early goals on transition, in part because of some poor defensive running and half efforts. But also because our zone looked a little out of shape. Addressed that at quarter time and as you say they struggled to move it forward after that. Similar game to the our game v dockers after quarter time. Scoreboard flattered them.

Tomlinson - best big defender

That was the worst umpiring I can recall. And that's saying something

Strange though because he was excellent in the first two rounds. I'm not a fan of his body language at times.

Tmac was back to his 2020 form tonight unfortunately

No dangerfield and no rohan. One more day for recovery. Some things in our favour. I am hoping they just beat the hawks (so they are not on the rebound) in a super physical game.

Nothing possessions though

Agree. A star. So athletic - and as good below his knees as any big I've ever seen. Really glad he slotted his goal too. And loved his move to grab the ball at centre square bounces. Important that he rucknin the last as it allowed Max to go forward. Good move by goody

First time we win our first three since 2005 and people want to winger. Should have won by 100 blah, blah, blah

Bloody hell the afl app sucks. Cant listen to radio post game and stations still blocked because all calls are via afl live

Not sure if serious

One more goal please dees

What language is brereton speaking?

We'll win this game by 6 plus goals. Putting this here for future reference.

Both. The app is worse, but that is more because searching around on app is harder.

Hello gil.

Could not agree more. Absolutely hopeless in terms of conveying information, which is kinda an important kpi for a website. As an example I also thought this hame was 7:10 start. Another is i tried to find info about next weeks prelim against the crows eg start time, venue etc. Gave up. Ridiculous given how much money must get poured into it.

They are very similar to the pies I reckon. Like the pies they are super focused on defence first football and contested ball. But struggle to score enough to take advantage of any dominance they have. The pies should have never been at risk of being beaten by the lions. I know it was wet, but similarly the giants had the saints on toast. Neither team can put teams away. I think it is a function of a game plan that involves too much slow transition, midfield that are past their best and average forwards, that are over reliant on individuals (degoey and to a lesser extent cox for the pies and greene for the giants).

The most MFC post ever. I love it.

I'm actually really pleased we are playing the crows at Adelaide oval rather than Casey. One, its fitting tbey play on a proper AFL ground. And two, unless it is wet conditions should be perfect in terms of wind. One reason I thought yesterday's win was so impressive was it a grind. Our skills still shone through and were a big factor. But the wind made it hard to score and therefore get out to a comfortable lead. Our game is built on precision ball movement, by hand and foot. And we are quite aggressive in terms of preparedness to use the corridor. Good conditions support these elements And perhaps our most damaging player (not best), zanker will thrive at Adelaide oval in good condition as will Pearce and Cunningham, two players that give us a big edge. If we are on, the crows will have a hell of a time stopping us from transitioning the ball quickly and scoring. As was the case when we played them in perfect conditions at Casey a few weeks back

I'm annoyed. I won't get the chance to yell, after Perryman is paid a rubbish free kick: DON'T PAY THE PERRYMAN!!!

Great win. Paxman was awesome. As was Gay. Cunningham was also terrific. Super important in rbe first quarter. Worked hard all game. Has been down last 4-5 games. Great time to play well.

Which describes Grundy i reckon who is not particularly tall anyway. Height is a big advantage late in quarters and games, particularly if combined with the fitness and athleticism of a gawn.

The other thing about an effective tap ruck is that sure other teams can set up to shark their taps, but the ruck can control where they do so. Which means that the team with the dominant ruck can set up their defensive structure in response. And for us, as aob noted earlier in this thread, we can set up to maximise our intercepts off half back. We control the structure because we control which part of the ground the roved ball is collected and kicked or handballed from (eg defensive side boundary side etc etc). we change that spot it is hit to which makes it very hard for the oppositionto set up a structure forward of the ball with any certainty.

Exactly. That's pretty much what bucks said. Riddle me this AF. If the ruck position is of no value why do every team have one?