Jump to content

URGENT ATTENTION: Major Site Update Will Require Email Address for Login and NOT Username. Please Ensure Your Email Address is Current.

monoccular

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17,171

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Everything posted by monoccular

  1. monoccular
    Another throw giving Saints goal.
  2. monoccular
    Will be interested to see if Saints are fresher for the week off
  3. monoccular
    Bugger one against the flow
  4. monoccular
    Sling tackle on Kennedy in the forward pocket!
  5. monoccular
    Forcing their kick ins wide.
  6. monoccular
    Jesse. !! Thst at kick in was OOTF. Are umpires still sponsored by OPSM?
  7. monoccular
    Whoever pushed McDonald into the point post, is a [censored]. He should be reported for unduly rough play. It was deliberate.
  8. monoccular
    Anyone still doubt that Ollie has earned a start round 1?
  9. monoccular
    OMG Clayton is a beast. 4 or 5 contests in half a minute.
  10. monoccular
    Garland and McDonald's disposal is going to cost us big time.
  11. monoccular
    How wide are those goalposts at that awful ground. 4 posters .
  12. monoccular
    Great tackle by Max ...... Gawn!!
  13. monoccular
    How quick is Hogan's handball. Did one like that last year to Pedersen. Quick thinking.
  14. monoccular
    Senile Wagner certainly has a go and gets the ball. Looks inexperienced which he is. Needs some time at Casey.
  15. monoccular
    Senile Wagner certainly has a go and gets the ball. Looks inexperienced which he is. Needs some time at Casey.
  16. monoccular
    Sandy has lost the plot. Nathan Brown!
  17. monoccular
    ^^ It would be even more remarkable and overwhelmingly exciting were it Roos !!
  18. monoccular
    Perhaps, Steve, because x is often used in mathematics to represent the unknown? Which, in my mind, would make Huelett one of several x players.
  19. monoccular
    So the AFL overruled what Ninthmond claimed to be a sound medical decision to play with fewer than 18 players on the field! I wasn't watching but did Gil go down and push the injured onto the field? Where is the AFL's commitment to player welfare. Oh - of course. Bookmakers will be unhappy. Media will be unhappy. Stuff club autonomy and player welfare. Of course, it may just have been Hardwick playing games.
  20. monoccular
    You are joking of course: the 2016 premiers may get pick 20+ Gil et al will change the rules to allow poor struggling EssUndone and Carltank priority picks
  21. monoccular
    Maybe they are expecting strong or swirling winds at Doglands at the weekend?
  22. monoccular
    I thought that they would be chastened at least for a few months. New pharmacist in charge?
  23. monoccular
    Not just international sport, old dee. Our homegrown sport too ?
  24. monoccular
    Congratulations - hopefully to a fellow true blue Demon.
  25. monoccular
    And they got the skinny kid. This time.
×
×
  • Create New...