Everything posted by monoccular
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Good team goal that one
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Kozzie in the back (not the dive called on 1116)
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Bowie continuing his reliable rise
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Gone to sleep again Dees.
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
"learnings"??
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Seedsman was allowed to do that last time. Don't we learn?
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Would have to be Smith ATM despite what he has done
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Sadly only on the fake crowd speakers đ I have managed to sync 1116 SEN so turned TV sound off
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Needs to pull his finger out - would be the logical out for TMc . Already behind VDB medical sub in DT points -3.
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Jackson is such a smart footballer - that kick to BBB was so imaginative.
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
BBB - score review. What was the call? Cant see evidence of touch. P1ssweak technology AFL. Just do something about it Gil you prancing polo pony
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
2 posters
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Dropping the ball in that Brown tackle
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Couple of good things Smith. Looking as flat as last time
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 22 vs Adelaide
Deja vu all over again.
-
NON MFC: Rd 22 2021
If one really thinks more about it in an evolutionary way, maggots metamorphosise into blowflies, which have compound eyes, so possibly not quite so far fetched as first appears. On the Hawkins issue, I canât remember which case but the MRO and or tribunals have very clearly said, if you pin the arms and the head hits the ground you are guilty. I guess they will do a Donut Dan on this one - âdonât rememberâ
-
AFL TRADE NEWS AND RUMOURSÂ
Inside or outside?
-
NON MFC: Rd 22 2021
The MRO is not a lottery, which is an exercise in random numbers. The MRO has very predictable numbers and were it sold as a lottery would quickly go broke.
-
NON MFC: Rd 22 2021
He may love the outcome but only if he is told to. So predictable that a Geelong star will be freed. Dangerfield was, as has a recently used term, a footy action, whereas Hawkins was undue force. Certainly far far worse than Viney.
-
NON MFC: Rd 22 2021
Some like it, some love it, but I cannot see the sense as it so much (more even than usual) depends on umpires interpretation and diligence, and the penalty can be absurd. Hate to say it but looks innocent (that said, ANB would get 3-4) Any footage of the Hawkins one?
-
NON MFC: Rd 22 2021
Both will get off under the âInnocent Cat veteranâ rule.
-
NON MFC: Rd 22 2021
Donât we all know that?
-
NON MFC: Rd 22 2021
Hasnât been told yet whether to look at it or not.
-
NON MFC: Rd 22 2021
I donât recall that there are degrees of tenuousness. Most importantly, did ch 7 make a judgement? If not Christian wonât even look at it.
-
NON MFC: Rd 22 2021
Trealor seems to have learned the art of the Bulldog throw.