Jump to content

Nasher

Primary Administrators
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nasher

  1. If your post on Frost was a cut shot to the boundary, you’ve just smashed this one down gully’s throat. I’m not sure what standard you are measuring Petracca against but he is travelling just fine.
  2. ? ...right?
  3. Hunt and Smith should both be available, but it’s pretty hard to see where they fit. Viney is apparently a lock.
  4. Hardly any Frostyisms in the last few weeks. Very pleasing. How about him charging off half back and putting it down TMac’s throat? I still suspect that there will be moments where he’ll stuff up and it will be costly, but I’m accepting that that’s the player we understand we are selecting and won’t bag him when it happens. Really happy with his present form. For his faults, the bloke has serious wheels.
  5. Nasher replied to Pates's topic in Melbourne Demons
    I know right? So many impatient people. He’s connected to Collingwood by lineage. Having them make rumours up about him is just part of the territory. I’d be amazed if there was any truth to that at all.
  6. JKH was excellent. Nothing flash but consistently applied pressure and contests. Flew once against the flight to save a certain GWS mark on the lead. The less said about the ā€œsupportersā€ who bagged him pre-game the better. Super impressed Weid as well. So proud to have always backed him - faith is being repaid. It was the midfield that got it done for us though. The Gawn, Oliver, Brayshaw, Harmes combo has become the stuff of dreams. Adding Viney in there makes it sound frightful.
  7. Boy that escalated quickly.
  8. Umpiring has been absolutely fine. Open the other eye, people.
  9. Nothing reported. Tyson injury unknown, Melksham looked like a face type injury- ouchie for a little while but should be fine (my speculation).
  10. I thought it was the correct call on TV. Haven’t seen a replay though.
  11. Loving this game so far. Harmes has just picked up where he left off last week, playing like a man possessed. Gawn, Brayshaw and Oliver dominant. Should definitely get the job done from here.
  12. Except for the 4 disposals to his name.
  13. Really disappointed for Kent. His career has been ruined by injuries.
  14. Exhibit a: how to acknowledge you’re not a fan of the player but get behind him anyway. Exhibit b: how to throw a selection tantrum and throw in some unnecessary name calling for good measure. Support Melbourne.
  15. The incremental difference between Hannan and JKH isn’t huge. Get around the lad. We’ve definitely still got the offensive artillary to get this done. Go Dees.
  16. The introduction of the bye round has pretty much eliminated the practice of teams laying down before the finals. The carrot for GWS beating us is the prospect of playing us again in the EF, at home, having only just beaten us. They’ll throw everything at us. I can’t wait for this game. Should be a ripper.
  17. We won’t know until this afternoon. There’s only been speculation so far, which appears to be based on ā€œtrained with the injured groupā€, which has plenty of other explanations that don’t involve missing this game.
  18. Why wouldn’t he just go back to Hawthorn? Or just ask for a trade to West Coast if he hates being at the Dockers so much, seeing as it was a ā€œgo homeā€ trade only a year ago. I’m with Ross - seems a rumour pretty unlikely to be true.
  19. Nothing says ā€œno changeā€ like that ins list.
  20. 5th and 8th are the only realistic finishes I think. If we lose to GWS, Geelong beating GC by about 50 points gets the job done for them on percentage. Collingwood losing to Freo is a nice dream, but it’s just that - a dream. The cue will be well and truly in the rack for the Dockers. They’re terrible even with cue in hand.
  21. For what it’s worth I couldn’t care less about the 1964 premiership either. I also couldn’t care less about the 2008 and 2009 wooden spoons either, and I was around for those (and in the case of 2008, worked for the club in a volunteer capacity). They’re so long ago now that they bear no relevance at all to the present.
  22. Yes, I believe putting heat on the coach (let’s not use the term ā€œquestioningā€ - that’s not what most do) at this stage in the process, with our record as it stood early in the season when the thread was started, was a clear cut case of supporter not supporting.
  23. You have to be kidding. People jump off on a weekly basis, that’s why there’s a ā€œis Goodwin the right man for the jobā€ thread still on the front page of this forum. That is a classic example of lightning a bunsen burner under the coach’s arse for absolutely no good reason.
  24. In that scenario we finish 5th (Haw 3rd, Syd 4th, MFC 5th, Coll 6th). It’s not possible for us to finish 3rd.