-
Posts
39,587 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
83
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by beelzebub
-
lol...more diversionary tactics...Hey everyone...im over heeeeeeeeeeeeeeere !!!!
-
better than being a sad sack seing everything as cr@p
-
look bigger...look wider.. just look !!
-
Lyon didnt pick...there IS no job with us...its filled !! Our incumbent...MM not MH !! ( cross fingers) nupp!! ( I agree)
-
Maybe a case of no job actually gong at Melb No vacancy...cough !!!
-
just mentioned on the Marngrook show also....Lyon to Freo...wtf I need a drink...maybe two !!
-
Its a little strange for sure. One of my bro-law is staying currently with us ( more filth..lol ) but makes for interesting footy discussions. ( A lot of patronising.but a bit of talk too lol ) He doesnt see it as far fetched at all. I know I knw.. Bubs brother in law says so so its a goer !! I realise its only our opinions but considering we come from differiung corners the b-i-l makes for a good sounding board An idea was raised.A wotif. The idea suggested was its a done deal. The clubs have spoken on the quiet to major journos and said.. look. When the GF is over we'll give you the word and you can let fly with your typewriters. Dont tow the line and youll get very little for some time. I keep coming back in my thoughts to what we're seeing. Its nothing. Its like the notion of the subject doesnt even exist
-
I'll ask my mummy Billy ( of course thats long distance to another dimension ) So when they announce a sponsor worth 1.9 + for the front..you owe me a beer !!...if they dont I owe you one. ( mines a pint by the way..start saving )
-
Its really quite bizarre, like were in some sort of twilight zone ( I realise some would have me in one already )
-
Old dee, you may hove noticed I didnt say we were waiting to deccide ( or indeed others) , just to see the realisation of previous accords its got that air about it.
-
Anyone see that one coming ?? a little left field..bout 3000 k left !!! changes things...but not maybe our situation.
-
its simple..2 mil + a year...Its not hard to figure.. for most..You..?? hmm You are indeed ignorant. You are not facing the reality of what is. Its changed a bit from last time. Your premise is false....how novel. Now those of us that live in the now.. Im glad you habve nothing what so ever to do with MFc neogitations as youre clearly out of your depth. I can tell..others can tell. In simple terms.. ( even you'l l possibly get this) we were . emphasis on were a bargain previously. Kapserksy and Hankook both got sweetheart deals. Dids we suffer ? No We were grateful and thankful. Even you( well maybe ) must see that if someone is prepared to pay 1.9 for the back then the front is more. Thats the case with all clubs.Thats how it works. The more prominent and visible position commands the bigger bucks. Which bit dont you get? Im fully conversant with the idea of retun on investment. Do you have any grasp on comparative values and/or the notion of 'todays' pricing ?? ( just for u )
-
Evil. ... please I do concur and empathise with your sentiments. In a perfect world we would all just totter off this mortal coil and end up in a wonderful place and do so even whilst inbibing the very air we breathe. We would all like all of our cherished champiosn to be exalted, to be honoured even in real time but then there's reality. In hindsight had Bruce the Goose been p!ssed off earlier we'd stil have seen Junior run the lines in ever decreasing minutes but in a manner more befitting HIS idea of egress. This fairy tail idea of footy just has to put to bed. It unrealistic for clubs, spectators and players. Junior came under the microscope not because of his age but because of fitmess. He was off more than he was on. Sh!t happens. Life happens. We all get old. Sure in many ways 30 something hardly seems over the hill but in football it's bordering on octenarian !! Every player will and ought to be judged on merit. Junior probably has his old mate Cameron to thank for his (in his view) untimely demise. We have to move away from the notion is something akin to a benfit society for sportingly inclined to the idea that we're an elite sporting club entitled to field the very best in competitive line ups. James I fear is ling in yesteryyear. If 24 hours is a long time and a week an eternity then a year must seem like eons. As the game inches evermore quicker the likes of J Mac get evermore slower. This glaring difference will come home hard the first time he takes to the field in the grey/orange strip. I really dont wish him ill. But hes in for an almighty wake up. Sometimes the past is just that..the past.
-
my point exactly.. Whilst not earth shattering MW can play as a FB or key back position at AFL level. Mightnt win AA doing it but hes able. I dont see anyone else on their list near the job, not yet. Just as GC went for a so-so ruck in Fraser..so might the Dwarves go for a ready made ( if not overly shiney ) bloke in Warnock. ( or not..lol )
-
They can not unceremoniously poach any more. But they can ask, and if all agreable its like any club trading, no bigee. Nothing stopping MW going to GWs if a deal can be done. Hed probably get a bigger pay cheque off of them than most clubs too.
-
hello Billy...I so look forward to your commentary.I always feel the wiser for it My learned fellow supporter....we have just leaped , in the quantum manner, from what we WERE getting.to what we are now able to get. By your own admission youre ignorant of any reason that our worth of our jumpers back should rise...but rise , and RISE it did. !! funny that The front is always worth more than the back..you do the math. Some things actually do follow in a logical manner.
-
Do they actually have a starting FB ? cant think of anyone of consequence.
-
Would actually be a meaningful pickup for them. He could help carry the walkign frames for some others also But in all seriouslness. If if comes down to a decent pick and a player ttto get The Jaegermeister then its a bit of a win win ( again..lol ) I actually rate Matty, much maligned...good luck to him
-
I see your 98 and raise you
-
Just as long as you can guarantee it HITS him !!
-
Harcourt.. Its no suprise to anyone Ive been a major advocate that he had decided to leave us ages ago. But do I think he signed ? Maybe not. That doesnt mean , for mine , that he didnt lie al the way through this grubby ( npi ) mess. I think he was certainly less than straight up. I do however dont think he lied to Stynes. The opposite actually, and that how the poker game came into full swing. I think he , through his management obviously , had agreed in principle to move, to terms not 100% ironed out. GWS realising a game was indeed in motion observed Melb's posturing and reacted. It does in a parallel help the notion it all came about at the end. He may well not have signed the line til last Sunday but he was well and truly 'gone ' a long time ago He agreed to go ages ago, this being confirmed. Upping the ante..who knows. I still reckon we come out of this sweet
-
the MFC offers one thing no other club can...the name MELBOURNE. Eddie would kill for it. BOM likes things Melbourne... marathon for eg Im certainly not saying that they will or wont. More could they or couldnt . They certainly could.....and should.. 2 mill for the front of our jumper per year with all its exposure is cheap ( in banking terms) You want to get known...we'll do that for you. Especially as a springboard.
-
If not MM then Id entertain Mathews. A premiership would be adequate compensation for his actions on Flower that arvo at artic park. Do I dare suggest Laidley as game day under Mathews ?
-
yep double yep !!
-
Well.. I was told their prime market is actually indeed Victoria as Westpac perform weaker here than other states. COM beating out most especially in Vic. This is Westpac back door approach. So im told. You wouldnt be bother with a shorts deal with the Sainters if you had a jumper in mind elsewhere. The potential for word enforcement and product identification is phenonemal with the MFC. The idea we cant be usewd nationall y is a crock...go ask Kaspersky.. Bank of Melbourne by its very name doesnt project a national ID it very closely alligns iteself with a city. BOM is a tier 2 business. Its looking to regain all that the good ol State Bank days before it got rudely reamed by the COM. But is it our new sponsor...who knows. I dont. Just think its interesting and certainly strange esp on its website. You dont nned red to enhance the logo..you could do that by fading the blue back ground al lal the logo itself. Could be a total ruse..( or is that rouge)