Wrecker45

Dodging questions and replying with emoji's just furthers my argument. I am beginning to think deep down you know man made climate change is a farce.

I wonder if @hardtack 's brother was a scientist in the 70's

Yes I am a conservative which gives me a massive advantage in thinking but that is not the reason I am right.

Ok. So your answer is because your brother understands the science. Thanks for contributing. Of course your brother has no idea. Nobody can say for sure that man made climate change, i.e human CO2 emissions have caused anything. The evidence is simply no there. If your brother is saying that he is ill-informed.

I didn't say it was naturally occurring although I presume it would be. You made a statement saying your brother has seen man made climate change first hand and I just asked how he knows it wasn't naturally occurring. Perhaps ask him and come back and answer the question.

How does he know it is man made climate change and not naturally occurring?

Or both.

No it doesn't but being a hypocrite does.

Irony. Presented with evidence you show a South Park clip saying look at the monkey.

Are you so naive to believe that the ABC broadcast / publish news on climate change if it goes against their narrative when they have publicly said they won't?

The ABC only broadcasts news on climate change if it fits their alarmist narrative. This makes them un-scientific and leftist.

Obviously an exctract from the climatgate emails. Investigation after investigation has found nothing to answer. Yet I read that and see concerted efforts to manipulate an outcome they are seeking.

It's incredible that NASA and NOAA have "adjusted" the 1930 temperatures down after the fact. It's even more incredible that the media and politicians don't seem to care. This is not some pie in the sky what might happen in the future scam, it is a well documented fraud that you can see with your own eyes.

What are to counter arguments? I've been to the site and it just seemed to be a biography.

Of course I would prefer to be in snow but I wouldn't be standing near a smoker in the first place. I dislike actual pollution. It is a long bow to draw that CO2 and not natural climate variations caused the tinder like conditions in 2009. If CO2 caused the conditions surely we can expect it to get worse every year proportionately as CO2 in the atmosphere rises?

You won't find me talking up NASA. They have completely lost their way.

HT - Are you really pushing something that will "probably" be said in 2021? i'll probably like the look of the draftees the dees select in 2021. What will you probably do?

Jara whilst I wish my condolences to your friends, linking fires caused by fallen power lines, to global warming is a stretch.

The AFL Unscrupulous Unit seems more appropriate.

We have been hearing what "could" happen since the industrial revolution. We are at a point now where the predictions haven't materialised. It is no good saying forget every dud prediction we have ever made,now this could happen. The race has been run and the predictions have been found out.

Did you just link to an article saying what "could" happen? That is embarrassing.

Please enlighten me. Show me the IPCC predictions that have eventuated. If you can't do that ( back up the alleged science with real world examples) Just humour me with something.

Common sense is to be expected from me. why would we / I take precaution from something that clearly isn't happening as predicted by the the doctor? Do you take medicine prescribed for symptoms you don't have?

hardtack - do I have more chance of being hit by a car or dying from climate change? lets get a starting point and then agree how ridiculous your argument is.

I take precaution when crossing the road. I don't subject myself to chemo in case I have cancer. There is reasonable cation and there is non-helpful or just plain ridiculous.