Wrecker45

I’ve never quoted statistics to justify the importance of Tyson. Just watching him play it is obvious we are a better side when he is in and playing well.

That was clear when you took pleasure in him missing round 1. Now we have less injuries, a stronger side and are winning. DOm Tyson is a key reason for that. Suck it up Stevetheprincessjordan.

I'm pretty sure this is a joke. He can't kick like harmes gives it away.

I doubt he will get the same free kicks as him. i went to Collingwood V Richmond today and Oscar could only dream of umpiring so favourable.

Wasn't banging the door down for selection at Casey last week. A lot to like about the kid but sometimes selection can be confusing.

You said the obvious. How is the trend in millions of years? I'd really appreciate your answer. you won't answer this because it demonstrates how hopelessly conflictited you are.

Would you care to advise the rest of us what recent years have had rapid global warming? don’t forget this is measurable so the normal global warming scare into the future won’t work. i’m guessing you will come up empty.

And he stuffed Trengrove’s career as well.

What is the conclusion "they" have?

The fact you say we heed what the scientists tell us shows you have a religious belief system. Do all scientists tell us or just the ones that follow your belief!

This is a religious argument and not one of mitigating risks. The more severe the unlikely consequence of not complying with a religous rule the more you need to do it just in case.

The BOM are not meeting in a dimly lit basements just like Exxon and any other capitalist fairie you imagine isn't.

To see how organisations such as the BOM benefit maybe read the thread. It's explained in detail a few posts up for you. The BOM is not impartial. They won't even adhere to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests. They are a scourge on science. NASA - National Aerontautics and Space Administration. Explain to me where climate fits within what NASA investigates?

Of course Exxon want to protect the billions they have in oil but they will move in a second to any other energy technology that is more profitable. How much have Exxon invested in solar or wind? Your question and your virtue signalling. Why should the worlds leading energy company invest in doubtful technology? The more the Government subsidies it the more they will invest but it would be just a ponsey scheme. Thank goodness for Trump calling the industry for what it is. Exxon has diversified their investment in energy and profits from renewables. The more profitable renewables become the more Exxon will invest in them. Unless you are a socialist it is pretty easy to understand. i have and do work in business and can assure you i understand. I'm guessing you don't and are a teacher, nurse, ambo or other union related field that relies on group wage rise.

EH - Thanks for contributing to the its happened before argument. Can you point to any man made warming or cooling that hasn't?

I simply can't understand how any logical person could argue that. The companies with the heaviest investment in fossil fuels dominate the energy sector and have diversified enough to benefit from other energy sources.

The answer is pretty obvious. BOM - bureau of meteorology. If man made climate change is happening their jobs are more important and high profile. The bureau gets more funding and they ultimately get paid more. Now have a look at the evidence instead of squealing IPA and refusing to look at the obvious.

If your enemy states a fact it is still a fact. You need to get over the association with the IPA and look at the content. It is damning.

I actually agree with you twice in succession which is unprecedented. The Age is full of fat left propaganda. This is where we stop agreeing the Herald Sun is centre right with at least an attempt at balance but is best known for its pictures and sport coverage. The Australian is by far and away the best masthead for journalistic quality, business, politics and opinion pieces but it sucks at left wing group think, being a picture book and sports outside the boardrooms.

For once you make some sense Dieter. When somebody is is on the receiving end of an unprovoked violent attack by multiple cowards and they fight them off it is virtuous.

The BOM has been widely discredited. Their scientific method at weather stations has been proven corrupt and a year 8 science student could identify that. We could go over this again with very clear evidence, pictures that verify, refusals from the BOM to comply with basic FOI requests and a raft of other evidence but I assume you prefer to virtue signal and then pretend to yourself that others are denialists.

Is this a light hearted post or are you serious? GLOBAL warming. It may have been cool in Perth but nationally it was blah blah. Implying Perth a state is irrelevant and then moving to a national average as if it is important when it is equally irrelevant is funny. How is the beats going in the UK? I only bring it up because you think the local weather patterns are significant.

How times have changed. No early draft pick saviours that need to come in round 1 and guide us back to premiership glory. Instead a mid to late draft pick who played with our affiliate vfl team, where we develop and look after kids, could come in and play a role round 1. Good luck Bailey Fritsch you have been provided an environment where you can excel.

First world problems. My 3 year old only knows 1 players name and it is he that shan’t be spoken of at Port Adelaide.

Consensus is a vote and best for political matters. Science is not about voting or majority opinions. Organisational views are political and self serving not scientific. Except for the evil Murdoch empire who are out to kill science.