sorry RR i re read my post ans realised it really didnt make to much sense
i meant that if we drop garland and bring in newton he should get 3 weeks to show his worth, but at the same time i think garland should have also been told here is three weeks go out and play
but i think garland will be dropped
im keen for newton to have a few games in the red and blue, but he needs atleast 3 games to adjust as i think its harder for forwards
wouldnt be unhappy if garland stayed instead though
i always say except for 2000 how many finals have we won? and how many top 4 ot top 2 finishes have we had?
top 2 and 4 finished matter, 8th isnt really making the finals
the problem with godders is that even though he did well on goodes (who got injured) was he had 4 critical errors (the age)
and that will always be the problem, when bartram is back i dare say godfrey will dissapear
i am still smiling over petterd, look forward to seeing him play against port
agree with a fe points but id still wait a few games
to change the culture we need a player to lead the club who WILL NOT stand for mediocre performances or mental lapses
brock step to the plate and lead the boys to a winning mentality
also when sylvia was at FF he did have barry playing on him and lets face it he has towelled up many a great FF not a guy playing there due to we had no one else
MASSIVE ELBOW INTO HIS BACK, he runs straight up to him and does it so he knew what he was doing, intentional, high impact, behind play
sorry about the caps
why didnt godfrey tackle him? instead he tries to bump him and then they get a goal
petterd 20 pos
11 kicks, 9 handballs, 1 goal, stood in front of hall
BRILLIANT! ABSOLUTELTY BRILLIANT!