H_T

That's fine, my point is I disagree with this: I believe he would of had a start in the AFL seniors at all of these clubs this season, had he been picked by these clubs. (With a tiny question mark on Geelong)

Your stats are up the creek without a paddle................................................it misses players such as Garland Most Improved Answer: GARLAND

I guess you can't really argue with Rhino on this one labelling him a thug! What a snout!

Nothing quite like having a dig at "The Filth", which ever way you go about it...I say!

No way.

BINGO! Agree.

Thats what they they said about Anthony Banik too... for those who can remember him!

Maybe 1 exception....they are a good unit I'm sure Bomber would of squeezed him in for maybe 1 game............probably against the Dees earlier in the year....

Incorrect. It's not rubbish. It is an informative discussion on footy's hot topics. "There is no room for the faint hearted." Obviously there is no room for you...

All Ricky could come back with, was "That's just bad luck, Glenn, that's just bad luck" in reference to commenting on other player-managers players. Very childish.

At 206cm, definitely a mobile type too. Very handy.....

Oh no doubt, he clicks the turnstiles over a few thousand times each week because of his freakish athletic ability and excitement. A great marketable name in "Buddy" and he has the whole AFL world talking about him. Same drawing power as a Ablett and Carey - no body's perfect, there will always be that attitude, but it is that same attitude where he struts himself which makes him the player he really is. "Almost Invincible"

Incorrect. He is a sprinter. He's not an endurance runner. Sprinting is his main asset. That along with some of his skills make him a player that has to be close checked by opposition.

That is just crap. He would of played at all 16 clubs.

This is a job for......................................................................................................Brian Cook

There is still a question mark over his attitude, hence him giving away free's. Also, nearly costing a tribunal appearance or two.

Wasn't Cameron Schwab the CEO of Melbourne when the MFC was found to have breached the salary cap several years ago and then penalised by a significant fine? <_<

Thats ok...thats how the majority all start out....as assistants

Don't know about - with 'EASE'...................he will miss this week against the Kangaroos, and perhaps one more after that. Bruce has been of consistent form of late. He's the danger now. A good game against the Kangaroos will see him right in contention.

That's interesting...the Ox is at the Bulldogs...must be poached for that to happen. Nevertheless this is a very popular topic, and is receiving more hits than tickets being sold for the new Batman movie.....

Great insight DarkHorse. You know how to work the room sure enough. Good to hear about Col's view on himself.

Just as much as Michael Voss. None. But as a captain, and his thoughts on the game, when injured, he coached with Malthouse helping out the youngsters in the understanding of the game plan(s). Nearly 300 games worth of experience, thats what he's got, and he's just out of the game. You don't need a hell of alot of experience to be an "assistant coach" anyway. Just ask Josh Mahoney. No need to be naive.

Agree, read my thread from last week, same title.

Green will miss. Not worth risking.