Everything posted by H_T
-
Anyone for cricket?
Brett Lee made life difficult for Wade with his first delivery. It was Harmison like. Actually Lee was wayward a fair bit - maybe due to the moisture in the run up and longer spikes for the players in general. But Wade did ok from what I *witnessed. He's no slouch with the gloves. * Didn't see the complete India innings.
-
Anyone for cricket?
Granted, it will be scorching if Wade replicates that a few times over the next few weeks. One thing I have noticed with Wade and I have mentioned it before is his tenacity in the middle and his disappointment on getting out. He knew he shouldn't have gone out to that ball (and he said so this morning in a radio interview; expressing disappointment). He values his wicket. Which I like. 72 off 43 with a considerable amount from hitting along the ground and penetrating the field (a wet outfield).
-
Anyone for cricket?
Very good innings from one Matthew Wade. That's the sort of innings he's been producing for the Vic's over the last couple of years. Nice for him to be able to do it under the National spotlight.
-
Nuggets' Music Videos
H_T 2.2 Sent to me by email this morning. I thought this package with images was well done. Billy Joel - We didn't start the fire. http://yeli.us/Flash/Fire.html
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
Tennis Anyone?
Hard to police no doubt. Monica Seles has a lot to answer for.
-
Tennis Anyone?
I've never taken the time to see them hit balls in the warm up or on the practice court. Do they screech then ? Personally I think it's embarrassing for them that they screech (aar-haaaarrrr !!) when it's the first point of a match. Regarding the men's grunt, do they really grunt ? I didn't really notice it until the 5th when both players were out on their feet from exhaustion. Federer is stealth like, cool as a cucumber. I can't imagine him ever grunting with the exception of in the cubicle once in a blue moon.
-
Tennis Anyone?
Agree on McEnroe. How is the head-to-head battles. Federer has won 16 slams, Rafa 10, Djokovic 5. Yet Rafa has the wood on Federer in Grand Slams and Djokovic has the wood over Nadal in finals (something like the last 7 on end). Amazing. Poor Murray ... for now. Djokovic over Nadal the last three grand slam finals... .
-
Tennis Anyone?
I was wrong. What a game. Thought he had it in the 5th. Goes to show what a competitor Djokovic really is.
-
Tennis Anyone?
Absolutely. Uncle Tony. Still a little blurry eyed today, but I'm pleased to have witnessed it on the box. I think many perceive Novak as arrogant. He's different but I don't think arrogant is accurate. Certainly in all his interviews he comes accross as gracious, humbling and polite. I think it's his battle persona on the court that gets misconstrued. Rafa has a similar persona after winning the big points as Djokovic does. They both have gone to ground, fists pumped and all look to their respective boxes for support. Bit harsh on the stupid little girl, maurie, annoying as she was. She's young and excited and probably a family member.
-
Anyone for cricket?
The English top order really struggled. Series win to Pakistan. It will be interesting to see what England produce in the Third Test.
-
Tennis Anyone?
Nadal for me DA. All the way on Sunday. He is on fire and the knee doesn't seem to trouble him. An extra day helps.
-
Anyone for cricket?
Ponting chalks up a half century in the second innings. Can we re-visit those Best XI sides from last year ?
-
Anyone for cricket?
Stating the obvious: I reckon we've got enough runs. Declare now. Haddin should shout Clarke a beer tonight. edit; Quickfire Haddin cameo chalks up 600 and we declare - 7/604. Now let 'em rip boys.
-
Anyone for cricket?
I think I read somewhere this morning Kallis has ~12,260 runs. Superb record nevertheless. I think Ricky has re-joined him on Test centuries. Good to see Ricky boost his average back up (~53) and Clarke is now over ~48, last I checked.
-
Anyone for cricket?
Not a snowflakes chance... .. However, it could be anytime soon. The fantastic run rate in the first session was remarkable. Clarke will be thinking of declaring. He may let Punter get his highest test score (current highest for Punter is 257), then bowl. The faster than expected clip in the first session has increased my initial target of 450-475 to 550-560 now.
-
Tennis Anyone?
Nadal stepped it up a gear last night. Looking forward to see Nadal, Federer and Djokovic make the pointy end of the tournament and see who conquers who.
-
Anyone for cricket?
3/469 - 134 runs for the morning session. Nearly 4.5 runs per over. Too slow ...
-
Anyone for cricket?
Lunch: Brilliant innings Clarke. 210* Brilliant innings Ponting. 198* Partnership - 385*
-
Anyone for cricket?
The Ponting-Clarke partnership continues and they now hold the record for the all time highest partnership v India (surpassing the Clarke-Hussey partnership - that didn't last long...lol) and the all-time highest Test partnership at Adelaide.
-
Anyone for cricket?
Not much has been said regarding Clarke's run rate. But this innings as well as his innings in Sydney are very good. It shows his intent to score at a decent clip as he has stated, he is certainly leading the way and his teammates are following his lead.
-
Anyone for cricket?
The difference from that fateful day is we're currently leading the series 3-0, and Clarke having displayed being a team man first and foremost, on home soil, will be mindful of not wanting to harm our bowlers by bowling back-to-back innings on a peach batting deck. Cummins and Pattinson will be in his mind and Siddle has played a full summer. Declaring with a solid total of 450-475 has it's advantages IMO. It already gives a big lead against a poor performing India with the bat, it opens up the opportunity for more time to get India out twice, and will likely give a bowlers a tad of a spell having to bat again. It also gives the likes of Marsh another opportunity to bat, despite a "putrid" summer to date.
-
Anyone for cricket?
Whilst we maybe champing at the bit to see big records fall today - and we may see some - I feel Australia will declare around 450. They won't want to bat India out of the game with the series already won (ie. make it a dull game). Australia may declare earlier than many think (ie. instead of the 550/600+ variety on first innings) - at around a total of 450-475. If we go for 550/600 our bowlers may not get a break. Something that Clarke will be mindful of I'm sure. Don't be surprised if we declare at lunch or close to/just after lunch.
-
Anyone for cricket?
I'm hopeful of opening the record books again tomorrow guys. Err ... touch wood...
-
Anyone for cricket?
Clarke may actually prefer batting at 5, whether or not the selectors push him up to 3 - or himself - may depend on the current 'development' or trials of Marsh and Khawaja in that position. The other aspect is when Watson returns, where will he play ? Back in the opening position where he did so well ? Or down the order ? Or is he a No.3 prospect too ? Many unanswered questions that will be answered soon enough, and the West Indies tour may present us with an answer or two in this transition stage of Australian cricket.