
Everything posted by H_T
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
New National Recruiting Officer - Tim Lamb
Flock or livestock ?
-
New National Recruiting Officer - Tim Lamb
We prefer to talk about the footy players that show some cheek, do well on a flank, don't skirt or mince and those that like to play in a topside. Those that don't mind to put the shoulder bone in much like Garry Loin chop did with his rump.
-
The No T$ No B$ Thread
Somewhat short sighted by Thomo calling Caro out in relation to the AFL mouthpiece. Caro sledges the AFL where warranted, particularly AD. Thomo has always come across with a bee in his bonnet where AD is concerned, and despite me agreeing with him on many occasions, the way he carried on last show was a little childish. Make your point and move on Thommo.
-
The No T$ No B$ Thread
That has been exactly my thoughts, regardless of where we finish. There is also the option of trade if our club has convinced someone. Which would be a hard sell, but anything talks, particularly money. There's always the highlight of getting a blazer as a Mfc player, to help when convincing....{a little tongue in cheek}
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
The No T$ No B$ Thread
Redleg, There is also Hodge, Sewell, Lewis, Hale, Birchall, and there bevy of fleet footed left footers. Superior midfield is a starting point and in the main a very well drilled side looking to be top notch for the first 6 rounds and set up there season (just look who they play). Their back line this year with the return of a fit Stratton seems more settled. They are where we want to be in 5-6 years time. Just about at the top of their game.
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
The No T$ No B$ Thread
In the running it had the sit behind the horse in front, in second. Last time I looked that wasn't out in front. It may have spent some petrol tickets getting to that position early, as instructed maybe, but it was certainly swamped over the final 200m in a 1100m race. And yes, they still haven't met, but that's beside the point. Sepoy has 10 wins from 12 starts now.
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
Anyone for cricket?
The more cricket I watch, the more I admire Test Cricket. I'm more inclined to watch and be more interested in Pakistan v England playing in Dubai than I am in a ODI Game 5 Australia v India.
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- Anyone for cricket?
-
Anyone for cricket?
All the best for the wedding 45 ! Deep breaths...
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
The No T$ No B$ Thread
Truly was awesome, wasn't it ? Privileged to see such a racehorse just so dominant against very good horses. Looks as though Moody will enter her in the Lightning Stakes (1000m) this weekend, before the Futurity the week after (back to 1400m). She'll have 20 wins on end before she leaves the country for her stint overseas. Brained them over 1400m on Saturday. Makes you wonder if she can go 2040m around MV.
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
Anyone for cricket?
And I thought Shaun Marsh has had a horrid Summer. Cam takes the cake as far as horrid Summer's go. He's going to have to work very hard to get back. I even wonder if he's got full support at the Vics ??
-
Anyone for cricket?
Matthew Wade. Two debuts in as many nights and two Man of the Matches to boot ! Thoroughly well deserved, and although David Hussey would not have looked out of place with M.o.M tonight, I thought Wade's innings was just as important. The catches behind the stumps were the icing. Wade also contributed well in the second T20 loss to India with the bat down the order.
-
Anyone for cricket?
Brett Lee made life difficult for Wade with his first delivery. It was Harmison like. Actually Lee was wayward a fair bit - maybe due to the moisture in the run up and longer spikes for the players in general. But Wade did ok from what I *witnessed. He's no slouch with the gloves. * Didn't see the complete India innings.
-
Anyone for cricket?
Granted, it will be scorching if Wade replicates that a few times over the next few weeks. One thing I have noticed with Wade and I have mentioned it before is his tenacity in the middle and his disappointment on getting out. He knew he shouldn't have gone out to that ball (and he said so this morning in a radio interview; expressing disappointment). He values his wicket. Which I like. 72 off 43 with a considerable amount from hitting along the ground and penetrating the field (a wet outfield).
-
Anyone for cricket?
Very good innings from one Matthew Wade. That's the sort of innings he's been producing for the Vic's over the last couple of years. Nice for him to be able to do it under the National spotlight.