daisycutter

this i agree with. but i would like to know what the dorks will be doing at berwick. even though berwick is a little bit closer it is still a long trip and only getting worse

best possums in melbourne

well i live at burwood, so well clear of the mcg and inner east and the shortest distance (google maps) to casey fields is 45km. no way i could do it anywhere near 30mins even in off peak. I'm also not too far from the monash fwy or dandenong rd. realistically i'd allow an average of 1 hour (and each year it gets worse)

sorry, no way in anywhere near half an hour any time of the week

depends what directions the board has given him re a new mfc 'home'. i don't think he has carte blanche

just sent a note to harry. said name the kid daisycutter and i'll shout the first year's mfc membership fingers crossed

you need to stop now, or you will go blind

wow, it's wednesday and this non-story has still got legs......fmd, it's strange times we live in

i said it wasn't raised in the question of 1 weeks suspension based on intentional vs accidental. Presumably, if they had considered it was in fact intentional then the defence may have raised it, but because it was ruled accidental it was moot. it was raised subsequently by the defence in an attempt to get the downgraded fine to be canceled but the tribunal (in this case) declined the argument and the fine remained. Presumably they felt a fine was not an appropriate condition to invoke the "exemplary record" provision. This was how i heard it explained by a reporter shortly after the decision (forgotten who). Bottom line being that this provision played no part in the final findings. i'm sure the tribunal would accept he had an exemplary record, just that they deemed it inappropriate just for setting aside a fine which doesn't impact eligibility for the brownlow.....meaning he still (possibly) has it up his sleeve for the future

but the "exemplary record" condition was not invoked in this case with respect to his suspension (accidental vs intentional). it was argued later, only with respect to the downgrading to a fine, where the tribunal did not accept the argument and the fine stayed.

no priors was only tried on to try and get the resultant fine rescinded. it was rejected. he got off the 1 week purely on a finding of accidental vs intentional. must be time for christian now to resign. again he is at odds with the tribunal, whether it is his fault or the tribunal's it's clearly unworkable and a farce

both

again, you are asking the wrong person. i have no idea, but being from fitzroy maybe he is a greeny?

still think we are [censored], red

i think you meant to address your post to gary pert, dv8. you should be able to get his email address from the club. i'm sure he'd like to chat with you. ?

when in doubt, turn to the mrp...... demon dlckhead: intentional, high contact, low impact - 1 week dorks dlckhead: intentional, low contact, low impact - fined $1500 ($1,000 of suspended)

nearly there....only 163 to go MEMBER TALLY 49,837

sounds like two drinking dlckheads came together at the footy and caused a spectacle both deserve some time in the sin bin

dangermouse having a mare

careful wyl, it doesn't take much titillation to set off uncle bitters

anyone know how to unmelt a membership card?

almost, sons. MEMBER TALLY 48,696

MEMBER TALLY 48,318

surely may should return in may (not june)?

i wonder if jack viney's fasting includes bananas? surely not!