daisycutter
-
Posts
29,519 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
59
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by daisycutter
-
we have taken quite a few in the aflw though, so we must have at least some scouts out there
-
anderson on 3aw predicting oliver will be a withdrawal hope he's wrong
-
i'm thinking more john doremus of "the passing parade" format ... lol
-
well what would you expect when the afl monetized the score review the score review has an official sponsor. more reviews, more ads, more money, happy broadcaster
-
not forgetting a tie knot either
-
or darcy moore?
-
-
what do you expect from a filth supporter? the minute he refused to listen to our expert witness i knew we were done
- 600 replies
-
- 2
-
-
-
- gather round
- hugh bump
- (and 6 more)
-
fair enough, wcw but i don't think there are many bays anywhere near the alice
-
yeah, they could have found a better photo. that one is terrible.
-
quite. herman's bay is in florida 😂
-
wrong. from a membership pov there were no reserved member seat entitlements, just ga
-
no need to insult dennis. at least he understood the vibe.
- 600 replies
-
- 2
-
-
-
- gather round
- hugh bump
- (and 6 more)
-
yes, but 5 games in and only had 1 home game. plus 3 games interstate.
-
go to fox footy seems mfc has gone to adrian anderson to advocate - g-d only knows why. can't we get a better advocate?
- 600 replies
-
- 6
-
-
- gather round
- hugh bump
- (and 6 more)
-
What they are saying up in Vulture Street
daisycutter replied to Queanbeyan Demon's topic in Melbourne Demons
brisbane bears from 1987 brisbane lions from 1996 -
maybe you are referring to this?
-
binman, given your hippiness, try replacing the the 'um' with an 'ooommmm' would be much more smoothing and meditative to the listener
-
"here's some more big guys"
-
The Umpire Strikes Back
-
lol. an afl document that describes the rules. that's real funny, uncle
- 600 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- gather round
- hugh bump
- (and 6 more)
-
ht, i think those types of actions count more towards the accidental/careless category rather than impact category of course it is impossible to find official documentation on this
- 600 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- gather round
- hugh bump
- (and 6 more)
-
the point i'm trying to make is that the grading is the key 1. careless vs accidental. forget it. that was the maynard defence and that has been removed for smothers 2. contact not high. forget it , was unambiguously high 3. impact. low vs medium. this is the only arguable grading category the defence needs to focus on this only and keep it simple. impact low is still guilty but attracts a fine not suspension.
- 600 replies
-
- 6
-
-
- gather round
- hugh bump
- (and 6 more)
