daisycutter

luci, i'm not sure "he almost died on the operating table" is really accurate. this is a major operation where there is always a possibility of death it is also true that without an operation he would bleed out and die we would need to know the the exact words used and the context i've had 2 major operations where i could have theoretically died but i never "almost died on the operating table" despite the possibility.

robbo is right about one thing - this whole saga is definitely w e i r d

oh dear hoist ... petard ...

let me know if you can find another afl club that can satisfy your exact requirements i'll save you the time ... you can't

no i want to look into the future about 8 weeks. the present has me baffled

anyone got a time machine i could borrow? only need it for a little while slab on offer

good to see you've narrowed it down ... don't forget the acronyms and abbreviations

think it must be time to get the bikies involved

there was, extensive too. have you been hibernating?

lol ... i wasn't complaining ... just a little curious

but don't forget the js case is still under consideration

you'll get that sort of rubbish everywhere plenty think that nick daicos is just an outside receiver with a good kick

well i didn't get the email, and i normally get all club email so they must hold my correct email address

we're too soft ... we'll just roll over and cop it 3 whole damn weeks ffs ... great way to start a season

it begins with e and end with o hint: 3 letter word

go onto demonland and post fairy tales

that's a very damning statement ...

yes, it is hard to see any realistic strategy here, which would be very strange for an established professional outfit like the connor group. either there is no grand strategic plan and it is being driven emotionally by petracca or there is a twist and an unrevealed detailed thought-out plan which is eluding everyone. interestingly, neither petracca nor his management has made any public statement either written or verbal. it is so far all leaks. the only 'fact' we have is that petracca has asked to leave melbourne in his exit interview, but even that has come without a public acknowledgement his (leaked) requirement is just to go to a large supporter melbourne club which is a pretty narrow option. would connor really go with this if he hadn't had pretty strong prior commitment from one or more clubs? i doubt it. this is really bizarre and unprofessional in all aspects and defies established trade logic i have no idea where it will go but every aspect of it is so damaging to so many ... and still crickets from tracc and his management.

thanks, i hope your info is on the money, smurf however, i understood that as it is crown land, local government doesn't really have much say. of course they would be somewhat closer than us to what is going on and probably privy to good info

does he work on a no-win no-fee basis?

i think the "considered it before" refers to connors group considering it for paddy ryder getting out of contract at essendrug. nothing to do with petracca

and another thing ... why was the delayed concussion leading to the high impact aspect not even questioned? where was the proof it was related to this incident, surely it is open to questioning?

anderson flops again ... why do we keep going back to the same empty well next stop the appeals board

you need to factor in the side deals that some clubs can "engineer"