Lord Nev

Looks legit. Company has nearly 1500 FB followers and lots of info about previous events. FB page is here: https://www.facebook.com/t14events/ Website: https://www.t14.com.au/

Come on man.

He'd 100% improve us IMO. Genuine winger on each side. But, not for 650k PA over 5 years...

Totally guessing, but feels like Trac has lead the way a bit with this. He was the first player I often noticed helping a player up or giving a pat on the back etc. Not sure about anyone else, but in turn I find that makes it more meaningful when you see one of them have a crack at an opposition player for doing something dirty - ie Trac's reaction to Ginnivan ducking for a free.

TBF, LH has a point about the other options available to them - Just me personally I can't see it happening.

100%. Plus, rumours are Jacko will be either a Demon or Docker anyway, so I personally don't think WC are relevant at all.

Was just giving the sort answer mate. Yes, they can split their pick or ask the AFL for special permission. Neither seem very likely this year though.

They can't trade their first round pick.

a) Don't think he has 'often' been the primary ruckman at Casey. b) I believe they're talking about his hands in and around the contest, not marking, given they're talking about disposal and go on to talk about his lack of aerial impact.

Can I say it again, they played different roles and if Gawn comes back and Jackson doesn't then it's the Weid role we need.

Mitch Brown. Then Weid plays the backup (Jackson) role as he has before.

Weid is a ruck/forward, Mitch Brown is not. If Jackson doesn't play then we need a ruck/forward. As already proven, Brown wasn't competitive in the ruck at all and Weid didn't play forward so your point is moot.

Sorry, that's rubbish. Weid had a higher hitout win percentage and at least had some to advantage whereas Brown had 0.

Well we need a forward/ruck if Jackson doesn't play, how did you see Mitch Brown's ruckwork exactly? Sorry mate, Weid stays if Jackson doesn't play.

Mitch Brown can't and won't play the forward/ruck role. If Jackson doesn't come back in then Weid will absolutely stay in and Mitch will make way. Remember the original lineup before Jackson pulled out by any chance?

Ok, but the point was actually to show he is a 'key forward' given some were arguing that point.

That's the whole point of him being depth.

Has played 8 games this year, so would suggest he's been useful.

Not sure it will be tbh. I can't remember a time since Burgess came across up until now where we've 'rested' players. Plus there will be the automatic couple of changes for Max and (hopefully) Jackson, so not sure old Simon 'Steady Hand' Goodwin will want to do much on top of that unless forced through injury.

That's the point, and it's reflected in his contract and selection. He's depth, but some here don't seem to have caught up with that and are still judging him against his draft order from 7 years ago.

Clarry just the lazy 13 tackles tonight (on top of his usual ridiculous stats). Things you love to see from players AFTER signing a contract.

Gutsy performance from him to shoulder that load tonight. Pathetic effort from fans to jump on here and bag him out straight away.