-
Posts
4,821 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by adonski
-
2023 AFL National Draft prospects: The next batch
adonski replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Melbourne Demons
-
2023 AFL National Draft prospects: The next batch
adonski replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Melbourne Demons
-
Leake and Windsor named. You've outdone yourself Wezza
-
Off the top of my head.... FB: Rivers, May, Tomlinson HB: McVee, Lever, Salem C: Langdon, Brayshaw, Hunter HF: Pickett, Petty, Petracca FF: Fritsch, van Rooyen, McAdam R: Gawn, Oliver, Viney I/C: Billings, Bowey, Sparrow, ANB SUB: Spargo No obvious second ruck is a worry, unless they actually view Fullarton as potentially best 22 Want SparGod in the side for his kicking but someone like Billings may keep him out as a higher upside option, or Goodies golden boy & future best and fairest winner in ANB Hopefully we see someone like Woey or Howes keep their spot if given the chance Unfortunate that there's no direct competition for Sparrow's spot with a similar type of player, hopefully that changes when picks 6 & 11 have names Chandler still remains an unknown, fell away so badly that you probably couldn't put him in your October best 22...
-
You'd hope so if we're taking him as high as #6
-
Maximus Holmes PTSD?
-
That's exciting
-
Bit of Jordan Dawson about him?
-
The 2023 Draft and Trade Targets Thread
adonski replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Melbourne Demons
Jordan Dawson vibes -
Overs for McAdam
-
Predominantly as a forward with a season or two on a wing
-
3 firsts to move 3 spots up the order? No chance 6 & 11 for 3 & 17? Yep
- 34 replies
-
- 12
-
Doesn't really have an aerial game like Melk Hes competing with guys like Spargo and Chandler I reckon. Best case scenario he can be a similar link man to Charlie but finding the pill 20 times a game compared to Spargo's 12
-
Future star or just a tease?
-
The 2023 Draft and Trade Targets Thread
adonski replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Melbourne Demons
We sure do need another mid (or two) coming through, I wouldn't be upset if we took him, looks like he'll be a player. Just think the goalposts have changed a bit given we've had another poor finals series, and we'll be looking for players who can provide a bit of a point of difference and/or impact straight away. Sanders might be plug & play, but not sure being the 5th or 6th guy in the midfield rotation over the next season or two will do much for us in the short term. -
The 2023 Draft and Trade Targets Thread
adonski replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Melbourne Demons
I'd rather 6 & 11 over just one top three pick, but if there's a world where we can grab Norf's pick 3 & 17 or something to that effect in exchange for 6 & 11, I'd probably prefer to take that route. Obviously this only happens if it enables Norf to grab pick 1 though. None of the highly touted guys expected to be available at our first pick seem super exciting, maybe with the exception of Caddy who would be a bit of an awkward fit. Sanders looks like he'll be a good player but doesn't provide any real point of difference, doesn't look like he can play anywhere else other than midfield either. Do we want to take a KPD with our first pick? Won't impact next year and we've gone tall two years running with JVR & Jefferson. Understand our hand may be forced with our second pick however given the Petty situation. -
The 2023 Draft and Trade Targets Thread
adonski replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Melbourne Demons
I have decided that Sanders and the key tall prospects are too boring, and that Caddy is too boom or bust Trade up and grab Duursma, McKercher or Watto -
Already rented out a room in Max's house, no going back now
-
Highly astute pick up in the context of what we paid Always struck me as the type who would find the next level in a better side
-
Oh you won
-
Welcome Shane O'Mac!
-
I wouldn't be able to contain myself
-
I would simply not trade what may be our best key forward in 2024
-
Trac to go back to Casey to work on his kicking. Don't mind it.
-
How could we? Means we'd have to play one of T Mac or BBB every week