Jump to content

adonski

Members
  • Posts

    4,824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by adonski

  1. Lotta people seem to be forgetting we brought in KPF, KPD, Ruck (rookie), Ruck (rookie) last year
  2. https://www.afl.com.au/news/1059770/plugging-the-leake-tassies-mr-fix-it-james-leake-rockets-into-draft-calculations
  3. Feels like the type of player Giants might take a punt on at their first pick
  4. Leake and Windsor named. You've outdone yourself Wezza
  5. Off the top of my head.... FB: Rivers, May, Tomlinson HB: McVee, Lever, Salem C: Langdon, Brayshaw, Hunter HF: Pickett, Petty, Petracca FF: Fritsch, van Rooyen, McAdam R: Gawn, Oliver, Viney I/C: Billings, Bowey, Sparrow, ANB SUB: Spargo No obvious second ruck is a worry, unless they actually view Fullarton as potentially best 22 Want SparGod in the side for his kicking but someone like Billings may keep him out as a higher upside option, or Goodies golden boy & future best and fairest winner in ANB Hopefully we see someone like Woey or Howes keep their spot if given the chance Unfortunate that there's no direct competition for Sparrow's spot with a similar type of player, hopefully that changes when picks 6 & 11 have names Chandler still remains an unknown, fell away so badly that you probably couldn't put him in your October best 22...
  6. You'd hope so if we're taking him as high as #6
  7. Maximus Holmes PTSD?
  8. That's exciting
  9. Bit of Jordan Dawson about him?
  10. Jordan Dawson vibes
  11. Overs for McAdam
  12. Predominantly as a forward with a season or two on a wing
  13. 3 firsts to move 3 spots up the order? No chance 6 & 11 for 3 & 17? Yep
  14. Doesn't really have an aerial game like Melk Hes competing with guys like Spargo and Chandler I reckon. Best case scenario he can be a similar link man to Charlie but finding the pill 20 times a game compared to Spargo's 12
  15. Future star or just a tease?
  16. We sure do need another mid (or two) coming through, I wouldn't be upset if we took him, looks like he'll be a player. Just think the goalposts have changed a bit given we've had another poor finals series, and we'll be looking for players who can provide a bit of a point of difference and/or impact straight away. Sanders might be plug & play, but not sure being the 5th or 6th guy in the midfield rotation over the next season or two will do much for us in the short term.
  17. I'd rather 6 & 11 over just one top three pick, but if there's a world where we can grab Norf's pick 3 & 17 or something to that effect in exchange for 6 & 11, I'd probably prefer to take that route. Obviously this only happens if it enables Norf to grab pick 1 though. None of the highly touted guys expected to be available at our first pick seem super exciting, maybe with the exception of Caddy who would be a bit of an awkward fit. Sanders looks like he'll be a good player but doesn't provide any real point of difference, doesn't look like he can play anywhere else other than midfield either. Do we want to take a KPD with our first pick? Won't impact next year and we've gone tall two years running with JVR & Jefferson. Understand our hand may be forced with our second pick however given the Petty situation.
  18. I have decided that Sanders and the key tall prospects are too boring, and that Caddy is too boom or bust Trade up and grab Duursma, McKercher or Watto
  19. Already rented out a room in Max's house, no going back now
  20. Highly astute pick up in the context of what we paid Always struck me as the type who would find the next level in a better side
  21. Welcome Shane O'Mac!
  22. I wouldn't be able to contain myself
×
×
  • Create New...