Jump to content

adonski

Members

Everything posted by adonski

  1. I actually think every result will go our way
  2. I rate Harmes. Just need to play him somewhere that’s not the backline.
  3. adonski replied to Lord Nev's topic in Melbourne Demons
    Saads very much an icing on the top type player. I would rate his worth as a late 1st round pick. I think a second rounder is unders, but certainly wouldn’t give a lot away to get him, either.
  4. adonski replied to Lord Nev's topic in Melbourne Demons
    I could see a scenario where we’d trade a future first for Saad and their second rounder. Deodoro would lose sleep at night not getting a first rounder (even if it meant also giving something back).
  5. Yep, diagnosed with a pea heart
  6. Maybe - but why wasn't he traded at the end of 2019, then? Given he played out of position last year too.
  7. More 'Frost is good' propaganda...just shows that Hawthorn are [censored]
  8. This cannot be serious
  9. Jackson, Harmes, Hibberd all tests
  10. We've traded Jack Watts for Jack Watts
  11. adonski replied to Lord Nev's topic in Melbourne Demons
    Langdon left due to Blakely
  12. adonski replied to Lord Nev's topic in Melbourne Demons
    Take it and run. Doubt Essendon does it though.
  13. I found the crows support of Scholl a bit weird
  14. Some truth in that, but even top 4 sides put out some absolute duds on any given weekend
  15. I mean both Brayshaw and Harmes had career best years under Goodwin, probably Melksham too. Brayshaw & Harmes are victims of playing under Viney. Melksham is anyones guess, with T Mac & Jetta just physically cooked.
  16. adonski replied to Elegt's topic in Melbourne Demons
    We got overs for Frost even when considering Hawthorn's pick will be pushed to roughly the 8th round in the draft
  17. Forgetting Brayshaw, Harmes is faster, bigger, better defensively & a better decision maker in the contest than Jack. Gotta take the emotion out of the name!
  18. adonski replied to Elegt's topic in Melbourne Demons
    I think we may find in time, that Rivers may have been worth the first rounder alone
  19. Big yes if the price is right
  20. Williams should be able to chip in all going well
  21. adonski replied to Elegt's topic in Melbourne Demons
  22. Could Bradbury the finals and a Brownlow medalist
  23. Well he has something over Harmes then! Who we persisted with down there for 14 odd rounds