deanox

DC, having read your post I was a bit confused and then having read mine again I think I am to blame for some ambiguity, and as such apologise: I was not meaning to suggest that you were signalling. I was referring to "you" the troll. I probably should have said "they" and for clarity I have edited my original post. Can you please let me know if it makes more sense now? However I really dont understand your last paragraph. What about my post implied triggered or not being part of the discussion? I felt I added to the discussion by not allowing it to be excused as "not really racist, just trolling". However, if you want to discuss further why racists think they can hide behind "trolling", the same way people have hiden their privately held discriminatory beliefs behind "its just a joke" for decades, we can!

Even if they don't believe it and they are just trying to get a reaction, by using that language they contribute to the systemic oppression and vilification of the target group. They signal to others that it is ok to speak or act that way or believe those things, even just in secret. They signal to that group that they need to be on the look out for attacks. That makes it racism. It makes them racist. It needs to be called out for what it is.

It's still racism, even if it's just trolling.

I can't agree more with this sentiment. BUT Oliver is regularly punched and hit off the ball by his opponents, multiple times every week. And they are real punches targetted at gut, kidneys, solar plexus etc. too, not just a little flailing arm push like Oliver did to Rankine. I'm not saying any of it should be acceptable. But you can't penalise teams with shots on goal for the soft ones, and let the others go. Oliver has become an umpire target unfortunately. He didn't get the frees for holding the man but gets pinged at the slightest touch the other way. It's a disgrace.

Aggree with this. We wouldn't want to tweak too much would we? But also, I understand what Jaded is saying: it would be nice to have 2 or 3 kick out plays we can successfully use.

But he didn't actually touch him, that's the problem.

I thought Tom had 1-2 moment's in each game, but I thought Weid looked more threatening and physical today. I do think Weid is better deep and TMac is better between the arcs.

Weid crashed packs in a way that TMac hasn't all year.

I don't think id play Jackson as one of the 2 kpfs yet. Similar to my above comment: play Jackson as a mobile flanker instead of Melksham. A third tall so runs around.

Interesting idea. I'm not sure if he is big enough for the no 1 or 2 role up front either. Could consideration be given to replacing TMac with the 196cm Brown and using Smith as a mobile forward instead of Melksham?

TMac averages 8 disposals, 0.8 goals, 3.4 marks, 2.6 score involvements this season. Today Weid kicked 2 goals from 7 disposals, took 3 marks and had 3 score involvements. TMac hasnt been in form but if he kicked 2 goals per week we'd have been happy. In addition, although Weid didn't take many marks and also ran under the ball a free times, I feel he hit and halved contests much more often than TMac has over the last 4 weeks, creating more ground ball opportunities.

Its just a one man monologue.

TMac for Brown if injured. If Melksham goes it, surely Hunt or Jones get first chance? He'd be the only change for me. Maybe Lockhart for Rivers, but you can't fault Lockharts endeavour or effort.

Im wondering who got left behind then? My guess was the following 12: Kolodjashnij Jordon Nietschke Baker Petty Chandler Wagner Wagner Bradtke Hore Sparrow Dunkley But if Sparrow is there, someone else stayed (Preuss, Bedford, Spargo?).

Is Sparrow with the squad? Im guessing not: we left 12 behind and only 13 haven't played a game this year.

6 Gawn 5 Viney 4 Langdon 3 Oliver 2 Petracca 1 Omac Apologies to May, but those couple of grubbers late cost him the 1.

A few times i felt he has been nudged under it a touch perhaps?

Lockhart good pressure this quarter and effort is good but just isn't there.

Assuming that's the one percenter end pressure act?

Dirty day for Lockhart. 1 free kick against, 1one percenter, and 1 pressure act, being his only stats. Its possible the one percenter and the pressure act were the same action.

This!

Omac one of our best so far

Neither is he.

50 m penalties mean we don't need to worry about connection between the mids and forwards. Soft 50 though.

First quarter of "trying to adjust our pace". We should have been doing it for years but assuming it was a real focus this week, it hasn't been bad. They still need to work out when to run and when to pause. But it's a good start.