deanox

We had 9 players under 24 playing last weekend, and ask holding their spot pretty well (Laurie is really the only one of the 9 who is still finding his spot). And then you can add Petty and potentially Spargo to our under 24 squad. So we've got a nucleus of a future squad, but do need to add a whole group more. I can see the benefit of loading on up a super star at pick 1 to help carry that next group through, knowing that we'll be able to fill a few more holes in the 25-28 year old bracket with free agency as our older superstars contracts end.

I suspect that might also cover things like medallion club?

Use the barcodes from the club!

Are there any bad seats on N? My preference is behind the goals because of view of structures etc, but obviously the other end is far away. (I'm lucky this time, I got N3!) The wing means you get the best view of both ends but it's harder to see the structures and width of the ground. Winners all around on Level 2!

Yeah that's a valid point. It's hard to have a role for a tagger if you are already playing -1 or -2 at the contest.

Good luck everyone!

Perhaps. I just know how hard we worked each week to get Melksham "on" the defender we wanted. Lots of byplay and muck around in the forward line to get it the way we wanted. And it never involved Melksham rolling up to half forward and the wing, the way TMac tends to play. But it didn't involve starting deep. Can TMac do that? Can TMac interfere with the contest the way Melksham did without giving away free kicks? I'm not convinced.

I feel like our "tagging" hasnt been about midfielders, it's been about half forwards and half backs. We used Rivers as an offensive weapon on dangerous half forwards, making them accountable. We use Melksham* on dangerous defenders, making them accountable. It's not the same as "stopping/tagging" but it is our way of taking key opposition players out of the game by moving them out of where they want to be structurally. Opposition teams try to do this with Lever. When we have Turner in this becomes more difficult because he can play the intercept role too. *Melksham is a bigger out than many realise. He has been unbelievable this year shutting down intercept players like Harris Andrews and Darcy Moore serially and by making them accountable. I don't believe we have a true replacement for him and am unsure how our structure will look with him missing. If TMac comes in, it may become JVRs job (JVR often took those players when Melksham was on the bench). Melkshams out really hurts our premiership chances I think.

If they schedule a match after a bye within the concussion period, it would make a mockery of the pre-finals bye and would rightly be met with outrage across the media. It doesn't matter that it is Melbourne, a smaller club, it would be a brutal response from everyone I think.

I think the players will give it 100%, and I think the coaches will expect them too and set that bar. But a late out, or some extra minutes to certain players, or etc might not be off the cards. With Turner and Fritsch in for the first time, we have lots to experiment with.

6 Lever 5 Melksham 4 Rivers 3 Viney 2 McVee 1 Petracca Apologies to Gawn, May, Brayshaw and ANB who all player vote worthy games. Even Roo is stiff, with 3 goals and some good ruck work.

Also, doing other things in your week is possible. They don't do this stuff instead of training and planning, they do it as well as.

With respect to "almost footballer": I think that's a bit harsh. He is doing ok for himself as a bloke who has played 175 games, and has a good shot at getting to 200 over the next couple of years. (ranked 915 out of all AFL/VFL players ever for games played, out of about 13000 players ever) I agree he has struggled with consistent positions though. A victim of his own versatility, and probably of changing game styles, list compositions and also his injury (the ACL).

I'm assuming this is a banner preview for his 200th game?

I don't understand why they don't do synchronised frame by frame from multiple angles. Like they do for "over the top of goal posts" or like how they do with edges in cricket. It would be clear as day that this wasn't touched if they lined up the two or three camera angles in synch.

If TMac is even serviceable tomorrow, I think he has to come in. He always takes a few games to find form, so better now than in the finals. I think Melksham is safe until Fritsch comes back. Although we could consider TMac, JVR and Grundy forward (Melksham out for TMac), Tomlinson/Hibber come in down back and Smith back to sub.

No way. The head coach reports to the GM of football. Effectively the CEO hires the GM of football to manage the head coach as well as other aspects of the football department.

6 weekends has him returning for prelim final. And it's a fracture in his knee, so my gut says he'll struggle to keep his fitness loads up during that time. For a first year player, that could be quite a drop off. Im concerned about Fritsch coming straight into finals without a match type run around. This is very worrying for the Pies as he has by far been their most important player this year (leading disposals, meters gained, score involvements, and 5th for goals amongst other stats).

Nah I reckon the Tiger made a mess of it.

Play for the free kick, get pinged for HTB

The Zone is lazy today. We're not working hard to get back and cover the spare that gets created when others push up. It's why there is constantly a free man ahead of the ball for the tigers.

Langdon having a shocker. Positioning, disposal, just struggling

It means that they don't have a lot of faith in Tomlinson playing well consistently, and are happy to throw Petty forward this week, then next week drop Tomlinson when he is slightly below par and swing Petty back and put Grundy forward after two strong weeks in the VFL. Edit: I think Tomlinson has been pretty good, but based on selection patterns this year the selection pattern don't think he is the answer.

I am absolutely shaken. This is the first time I have seen or heard anyone involved in AFL media use the word laconic correctly.

@Demonland and @binman on the pod there was discussion around why listing Grundy as omitted vs managed or soreness. I am pretty sure that the CBA requires players to continue to receive match payments when they were in the team, but are unavailable for selection due to injury. I would hazard a guess that this is part of the reasoning why clubs choose to manage players sometimes but omit other times. Unsure if it applies here.