Geddy Lee

Bradley was soft?

You've proven in this thread already you don't understand the issue. It's got something to do with present value and potential. Keep reading and you might be able to contribute more then taking people's posts out of context.

Richmond come 9th in years like this Pates.

I'm a big advocate of trading players that will never be much good but manage to boost their trade value by playing well in the 2nd half of seasons. It's a unpopular opinion and is barraged by calls that "He's come good" and "Why develop him then!" but I think CJ is prime for a trading. Just IMHO. If Sylvia/Rivers had done the same I'd be saying the same.

There are so many infuriating teams this year, Roos, Saints, Crows, Pies, Bombers, I can't ever ****ing tip em.

Was Carroll's MFC debut his AFL debut?

This is the crux of the matter. Jim Stynes was furious when MacNamee was selected, PG not listening to his team. He is rectifying the situation. I personally have no problem with it because I disagreed with his appointment.

I know that the MFC saw consultants for this appointment, and a certain ex Hawks pres told them they'd be fools to not get Fox, and fools to get PMcN, who doesn't work hard enough. I'm sick of this club making stupid administrative decisions with our money.

I meant the team's performance.

Sylvia continues along his merry path to embrace his destiny as the greatest junk time player of all time. I think I can sum up this team performance with just one player analysis: Brett Peake - a class above When BP looks good, you played #&%#&*& @#&

They all tipped Ziebell to go pick4, bit of a surprise for me.

Alot of you guys didn't obviously see some of the threads he was creating right before he was banned, threads that got deleted straight away and rightly so. The guy WAS occasionally good for a laugh but crossed the massive tool threshold a fair while back.

Credit where credits due, nice work.

I watched alot of Lewis Johnston, saw him in person on the Wednesday, I think he'll be one to struggle to transition; people are rating him far too highly. Strange NikNat thought S Hill was best player of the carnival or WA or whatever it was.

I went, had to get out of work to go.

I thought the real concern was that he played on Matthew Boyd (33 possies) and never laid a tackle on the bloke. 0 tackles for the game and a heap of turnovers.

6. Brad Green - our best 5. Cameron Bruce - our second best 4. Brad Miller - was good, looked really good in junk time 3. L. Dunn - well Dunn Sunn 2. Garland 1. Valenti Not giving votes to Wheatley, too loose this week. Martin was OK but being beaten on the lead by Will Minson is a little embarrassing.

If Dunn continues to absolutely slay opposition stars every week, Bartram finds himself far too niche to get a regular gig.

I've reached the point where I am not expecting anything from Sylvia every week so I won't be disappointed. Bell was average I thought. Wheatley kept turning it over, and so did Jones/Morton to a lesser extent.

I'm the same just with Rich and Hartlett switched around.

I love how some people are saying "Worsfold has too much credibility to tank yadda yadda" when he's the same guy who put up with his players high out of their minds for several years.

Great input Anders but if Melbourne have #1 and don't pick Watts then Hartlett or Hurley will be in the Top 3 at the expense of Watts IMO.

Heard of a kid called Hartlett? He might kick Nat or Watts out of the Top 3.

I think it's out of Rich and Watts personally. Rich is a freak.

By that description he sounds a bit like Riewoldt; is that fair?