Mickey

Yep, kicking long to a pack would be fine if our smalls were ever front and centre. But it seems they are always too far up the ground playing the press

Sparrow and Harmes in. No Woey unless he is the sub or there's a late change

I assume it's Neil Erasmus. Pick 10 in the 2021 draft. Listed as 190cm but he's just a kid, Trac would destroy him. I also wish luck to anyone trying to rough up Steven May...

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/1339279/kings-birthday-blockbuster-sold-out Club confirming that upgrading to reserved seating is still possible. If you are a GA member and don't have a reserved seat, you won't get in.

Doesn't sound like we'll appeal https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/1338851/hunter-sanction-upheld-at-afl-tribunal "As a result of the sanction, Hunter will miss the Demons’ upcoming game against Walyalup (Fremantle)."

Given its only a week, I think we'll cop it on the chin. It's BS, but that's AFL

He lost

It's ridiculous because there is always the question of whether it is reasonable. Hunter could have karate kicked Rozee into next week, then won the ball. But that's not a reasonable way of contesting the ball.

Beat me to it

Interesting that all of our losses have come on the road after being such a good travelling team recently. May be the opposition rather than where we played, or perhaps it's just that we aren't good enough to beat top 8 teams at their home grounds (other than Essendon who just smashed us).

After round 10, it's only 4 and one of them is an own goal. Another is to Geelong. Not exactly taxing.

You'd think, given their lack of forward line, that they should struggle to kick a score. But given we aren't great defending ground balls inside 50, Dixon and Marshall out may not be an issue for them

Probably purposefully hurting people. Mitchell was known for deliberately giving opposition corkies

For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

I'll be pleasantly surprised if he gets off. But I don't think he will

The only want it downgraded if it doesn't get thrown out.

For those citing Ballard holding the back of his head, the sun's have already said it was because he heard a crack in his neck and not due to where Van Rooyen hit him. That doesn't mean the hit didn't cause it, but that's why he had the stretcher. It was purely precautionary. No concussion, no neck injury, a football action. He should get off

We're appealing

Do we want the Tigers to win to go above freo, or are we really gunning for pick 1 and the Eagles to win?

Disco is in for Hibbo

Gus's disposal was noticeably clean last night

Or negotiate no move clauses. Give up some $$$ to stay where they are