Jump to content

David Hale

Featured Replies

Posted

Given our desire to seek a second ruck, is David Hale a feasible option? Not a demand, but definately a worthwhile question.

 

Ah, thank you. Thank you very much.

 

Not sure that we could get him - but of all of the players looking for a new home, he's the one who'd really boost our list.

Proven tall forward - and capable ruckman - to ease the load on Jamar while Fitzpatrick and Gawn develop.

Would allow us to jettison PJ which needs to happen sooner or later.


Given our desire to seek a second ruck, is David Hale a feasible option? Not a demand, but definately a worthwhile question.

Feasible but what would it cost us? If he comes cheaply I say we jump at it.

 

Feasible but what would it cost us? If he comes cheaply I say we jump at it.

is bate cheap enough

is bate cheap enough

don't think Bate is going anywhere!!! If the club still has him doing media gigs(TAC superstars) then he is safe as houses. They don't put potential trade players out there to spruke the club


I can't believe my eyes. I needed the laugh first up on a Monday morning, but now...

is bate cheap enough

IMO bate is our handy Utility, but isn't the longterm answer as our key forward. I see him more like a Goddard but with inferior hands.

IMO bate is our handy Utility, but isn't the longterm answer as our key forward. I see him more like a Goddard but with inferior hands.

and slower....and not as good as kick...and not all australian utility...

don't think Bate is going anywhere!!! If the club still has him doing media gigs(TAC superstars) then he is safe as houses. They don't put potential trade players out there to spruke the club

cant hold a spot though. brock gave 10 then was gone. anything can happen

I think Hale would be perfect for our list. He and Russian are both the same age, and in 4 yrs time when both would be in their 30's we'd have Gawn and Fitzpatrick to take over from them.

Hale can play in the forward line and is mobile enough around the ground to. How many guys at nearly 200cm who have been in the league for a while, can we pick up on the cheap. Nth don't need him given they've got Goldstein, McIntosh, and Petrie as their top bigmen.

I think this is a very good suggestion, and one i've seriously thought about as well.


Is there any evidence that David Hale can ruck?

I'm really not trying to dissmiss the guy but it seems that he's been best used as a stay at home forward

Bit slow, can't do much once the balls is on the floor.

No thanks, unless there's someone who can actually help Jamar in the ruck I think we're in a not too bad position.

As difficult as it may be to accept, PJ did a really great job once he returned in the last couple of months. Is there much diff b/w Hale and PJ's ruck work? could be seeing big Max anyway

Edited by pitchfork

cant hold a spot though. brock gave 10 then was gone. anything can happen

there is one thing a player giving $10K of his hard earned and another thing putting a plyer out on media duties for the club.

Is there any evidence that David Hale can ruck?

I'm really not trying to dissmiss the guy but it seems that he's been best used as a stay at home forward

Bit slow, can't do much once the balls is on the floor.

No thanks, unless there's someone who can actually help Jamar in the ruck I think we're in a not too bad position.

As difficult as it may be to accept, PJ did a really great job once he returned in the last couple of months. Is there much diff b/w Hale and PJ's ruck work? could be seeing big Max anyway

Yes Hale can definitely ruck .... he began his career as a ruckman - and only went forward when McIntosh emerged. I'd take him as a knock ruckman over PJ any day- (quite apart from the fact that he can mark)

Realistically big Max is at least two years away ... even if his knee hasn't gawn

Bit slow, can't do much once the balls is on the floor.

Not many of us can...

One thing I'd be looking closely at in fwd-ruck is defensive pressure - we can't afford to have a statue that defenders can easily run off. Leigh Brown, Paddy Ryder and Mitch Clark average about 4 tackles per game - David Hale averages less than 2 and Jesse White averages close to 1.


One thing I'd be looking closely at in fwd-ruck is defensive pressure - we can't afford to have a statue that defenders can easily run off. Leigh Brown, Paddy Ryder and Mitch Clark average about 4 tackles per game - David Hale averages less than 2 and Jesse White averages close to 1.

You might be expecting a bit much from Hale's tackling when he's played at full-forward compared to playing in the middle.

Also worth noting that Leigh Brown is 194cm to Hale's 201cm. Brown plays all over the ground as well, giving more opportunities to tackle.

Ryder is also 197cm and probably one of the most athletic big men in the game who again spends most of his time in the middle. Again, more opportunities to tackle.

Clark is the only one comparable to Hale in terms of height given he is 200cm, yet he also plays more of a roaming ruckmen type role. I'm not sure if your stats are career averages or just from last year, but i fully expect that if Hale played in the centre of the ground and not a full-forward for the Kanagas then he would have had more tackles.

Anyway, i'd feel pretty confident the club could get him to improve on his tackling if it was a concern.

Regardless, for mine he just ticks the right boxes for our lineup. Can play as a second ruck, go forward and kick goals, is another legitimately big body, and is reasonably mobile to play around the ground. He's worth a shot and would be a real upgrade over pj.

You might be expecting a bit much from Hale's tackling when he's played at full-forward compared to playing in the middle.

Also worth noting that Leigh Brown is 194cm to Hale's 201cm. Brown plays all over the ground as well, giving more opportunities to tackle.

Ryder is also 197cm and probably one of the most athletic big men in the game who again spends most of his time in the middle. Again, more opportunities to tackle.

Clark is the only one comparable to Hale in terms of height given he is 200cm, yet he also plays more of a roaming ruckmen type role. I'm not sure if your stats are career averages or just from last year, but i fully expect that if Hale played in the centre of the ground and not a full-forward for the Kanagas then he would have had more tackles.

Anyway, i'd feel pretty confident the club could get him to improve on his tackling if it was a concern.

Regardless, for mine he just ticks the right boxes for our lineup. Can play as a second ruck, go forward and kick goals, is another legitimately big body, and is reasonably mobile to play around the ground. He's worth a shot and would be a real upgrade over pj.

Not overly fussed about this bloke. There's a reason he couldn't get a game at North and the fact he couldn't after Petrie went down again is concerning.

He could be worth a punt however what we would have to give up is the big question.

He isn't worth a first round pick. He is probably a late second round and a player maybe but what players do we realistically have that north want or need and that we would be willing to give up (especially in light of today's signings announcement)?

Summing everything up i'd probably just say no.

 

Yes Hale can definitely ruck .... he began his career as a ruckman - and only went forward when McIntosh emerged. I'd take him as a knock ruckman over PJ any day- (quite apart from the fact that he can mark)

Realistically big Max is at least two years away ... even if his knee hasn't gawn

I think he'd cost too much, compared to the out of fashion Q. Get someone short term & cheap. And draft kids for 2 years time.

You might be expecting a bit much from Hale's tackling when he's played at full-forward compared to playing in the middle.

Also worth noting that Leigh Brown is 194cm to Hale's 201cm. Brown plays all over the ground as well, giving more opportunities to tackle.

Ryder is also 197cm and probably one of the most athletic big men in the game who again spends most of his time in the middle. Again, more opportunities to tackle.

Clark is the only one comparable to Hale in terms of height given he is 200cm, yet he also plays more of a roaming ruckmen type role. I'm not sure if your stats are career averages or just from last year, but i fully expect that if Hale played in the centre of the ground and not a full-forward for the Kanagas then he would have had more tackles.

Anyway, i'd feel pretty confident the club could get him to improve on his tackling if it was a concern.

Regardless, for mine he just ticks the right boxes for our lineup. Can play as a second ruck, go forward and kick goals, is another legitimately big body, and is reasonably mobile to play around the ground. He's worth a shot and would be a real upgrade over pj.

good points you raise.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Thanks
    • 566 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 40 replies