NON-MFC: Trade Talk

[layzie 33,793]

An erratic club for an erratic player in Lukosius. It's almost too perfect. 

Edited September 24 by layzie

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[whatwhat say what 22,737]

2 hours ago, Demonland said:

 

i don't see soldo making their best side personally

i don't see soldo make any decent side's best 23

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[Nascent 9,212]

Tigers could very well have picks 1, 6, 9, 13, 16, 21, 22.

They also have a plethora of later picks to target future picks and Brisbane's first rounder.

We should have a good relationship with yze and perhaps there will be deals to be done for us there.

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[whatwhat say what 22,737]

flow on effect from mcqualter getting the meth coke coaching gig

wantaway tigs going to play under a bloke they know

[Demonland 72,146]

Gotta love a MEGA TRADE

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[Deespicable 2,726]

I reckon the most interesting draft trade (outside of what we do) is North Melbourne with pick 2.

Given they have spent all their high picks in past three years on mids - Phillips, Wardlaw, Sheezel, McKercher and Duursma, they now find themselves staring down taking another one, unless they can somehow trade with the Saints (picks 7 and 8 - Battle) or Freo (picks 10 and 11) and get two picks of slightly less value.

Last year the deal would be done easily, but this year with very little between the likely top 10, both St Kilda and Freo would be reluctant to give up two picks - the Dockers will have to give one away anyway for Bolton.

So North, who would love to get two talls rated in the 6-15 category (eg: Armstrong and Trainor) in exchange for pick 2 - are stuck with deciding whether they take Langford (tall left foot mid) or O'Sullivan (classy mid/fwd Sheezel style) unless a club makes a nice but somewhat bizarre deal with them. 

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[whatwhat say what 22,737]

12 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

i think one of the things that is easy to forget is that afl players are afl players because, well, they grew up idolising other afl players

as such, it makes sense that they want to go and play for the club that they supported - it's a definite advantage for the likes of the filth (perryman), meth coke (baker), and the crom (cumming)

he's a great get for them given their age and list demographics

[Demonland 72,146]

[John Crow Batty 8,863]

49 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

i think one of the things that is easy to forget is that afl players are afl players because, well, they grew up idolising other afl players

as such, it makes sense that they want to go and play for the club that they supported - it's a definite advantage for the likes of the filth (perryman), meth coke (baker), and the crom (cumming)

he's a great get for them given their age and list demographics

Shame we could never land Pendlebury and Buddy who were reputed to be Dee’s fans when young.

Edited October 1 by John Crow Batty

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[whatwhat say what 22,737]

30 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

same happened for gunston at the crom, where he was the best young player winner or some such, and had the reward bestowed upon him withdrawn when he went to dingley

[Axis of Bob 11,785]

20 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

same happened for gunston at the crom, where he was the best young player winner or some such, and had the reward bestowed upon him withdrawn when he went to dingley

#thingssuccessfulclubsdo

[Demonland 72,146]

 

[Demonland 72,146]