Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

50m Penalties in the AFL stat's are credited to the side benefiting.   Surely it's not a penalty then?  Has irked me for a long time.  Definition (admittedly Wikipedia, but still, accurate)  .
(in sports and games) a handicap imposed on a player or team for infringement of rules.

Anyone know why it's recorded this way?

 

The side that gets the advantage is getting a 50m "benefit".

But more importantly, I want to know if the umpires have an accurate way to measure them, or are they just roughly estimated. One a couple of weeks ago was measured at 65 metres.

11 minutes ago, mauriesy said:

The side that gets the advantage is getting a 50m "benefit".

But more importantly, I want to know if the umpires have an accurate way to measure them, or are they just roughly estimated. One a couple of weeks ago was measured at 65 metres.

Maybe in the benifits of the accuracy of definition we are seeking in this topic, we should also rename them 50 ± 15m benifits? 😊

Edited by Rodney (Balls) Grinter

 
15 hours ago, KysaiahMessiah said:

50m Penalties in the AFL stat's are credited to the side benefiting.   Surely it's not a penalty then?  Has irked me for a long time.  Definition (admittedly Wikipedia, but still, accurate)  .
(in sports and games) a handicap imposed on a player or team for infringement of rules.

Anyone know why it's recorded this way?

Isn't it the same principle as a free kick - ie, for and against? For every free kick for that a team is credited with, a free kick against is credited to its opponent. Isn't it the same with 50m penalties? 

I don't know about you all but I am finding it extremely difficult to find where 50m penalty stats in games?


  • Author
45 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Isn't it the same principle as a free kick - ie, for and against? For every free kick for that a team is credited with, a free kick against is credited to its opponent. Isn't it the same with 50m penalties? 

I'm maybe caught up on the language.  Isn't a free kick given?  But the word penalty means to penalise,  not award.  Anyway, probably one of my quirks 😀

16 hours ago, KysaiahMessiah said:

50m Penalties in the AFL stat's are credited to the side benefiting.   Surely it's not a penalty then?  Has irked me for a long time.  Definition (admittedly Wikipedia, but still, accurate)  .
(in sports and games) a handicap imposed on a player or team for infringement of rules.

Anyone know why it's recorded this way?

Agree this has always bugged/confused me too.

To be honest, when reading stats of a game I haven't seen which says (hypothetically) that it was Melbourne 2 x 50m penalty and our opponents 0 x 50m penalty, I have no idea whether that means we received two or gave two away. 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
    • 15 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 14 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Haha
    • 147 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Like
    • 489 replies
    Demonland