9 minutes ago, Dannyz said:

I'm not saying it's hard to achieve, however, I think it's easy to surmise from the publicly available information, particularly the betsy article, that any building a new tunnel would have implications on the primary use of Caulfield Racecourse Reserve.

That Betsy article is someone's agenda.

Could not be more full of 💩 if it tried....and it did try hard 😉

It's a fabricated stance.

6 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

That Betsy article is someone's agenda.

Could not be more full of 💩 if it tried....and it did try hard 😉

It's a fabricated stance.

Glad to see you know more than the rest of us

13 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

That Betsy article is someone's agenda.

Could not be more full of 💩 if it tried....and it did try hard 😉

It's a fabricated stance.

A problem for one may not be a problem for another, but a problem nevertheless in any negotiation.

Negotiations don’t generally get resolved by simply telling one side to ignore their concerns.

Edited 3 hours ago3 hr by Redleg

5 minutes ago, Redleg said:

A problem for one may not be a problem for another, but a problem nevertheless in any negotiation.

I take issue with the nonsense that ir is a problem.

Lets call it what is !!

2 hours ago, Dannyz said:

the tunnel is most definitely the obstacle

There's a Tunnel Under Ocean Blvd

3 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

I take issue with the nonsense that ir is a problem.

Lets call it what is !!

Unless you are a horticultural horse racing track expert, on the effect of tunnels being built under them and all of the possible effects to the structure and composition of the racing track above, maybe your suggestion that there is no problem in the minds of some experts in that specific area is the nonsense.

I say the above with the greatest respect to your technical expertise in the construction of tunnels.

I expect Caulfield to go ahead, but that doesn’t mean there are not genuine concerns of some, that need to be discussed and negotiated.

Over and out for the time being.

Back to celebrating our great win yesterday.

Edited 3 hours ago3 hr by Redleg

23 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Unless you are a horticultural horse racing track expert, on the effect of tunnels being built under them and all of the possible effects to the structure and composition of the racing track above, maybe your suggestion that there is no problem in the minds of some experts in that specific area is the nonsense.

I say the above with the greatest respect to your technical expertise in the construction of tunnels.

I expect Caulfield to go ahead, but that doesn’t mean there are not genuine concerns of some, that need to be discussed and negotiated.

Over and out for the time being.

Back to celebrating our great win yesterday.

There are already tunnels under the racing track are there not?

Guys/Girls… I have huge news on our new home, from a very reliable source. Our new home, is inside Carlton’s head… rent free!

c

1 hour ago, KozzyCan said:

There are already tunnels under the racing track are there not?

There are and they were built at times that suited racing to lose meeting at Caulfield, like at a time for regrassing the track and with other city tracks available to take the lost race meetings.

Note Moonee Valley is out of action for a while and Sandown is like a country track.