Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

MFC have just dropped another podcast for the week, Pert answering members questions. One of the first things he says before getting to questions is the Dees will have a members forum later this year where all members can come along and ask any questions they want.

All the club leaders and Football dept leaders will be involved. 

 

Members forums are pointless in the age of social media but it's encouraging that they are risking a PR disaster here. I suspect there will be some degree of filtering and selective questioning but hopefully someone poses some serious questions.

Some questions I'd like answered:

1. How does the club quantify the impact of failed on-field KPIs on the club?

2. If pre season surgeries are a catalyst in the disappointing season, how did the FD initially quantify the initial perceived impact to team success and momentum? Mainly what I would want answered is, how did these surgeries impact the team so greatly as to be a catalyst for one of the most significant falls in the game's history? When the FD initially went to the board to advise of a slow start to the season, how was that anticipated slow start quantified? I don't want to hear "oh well we had this many players go in for surgery". I want to see it quantified: ie. WHY would THOSE specific players have impacted us so greatly? Show me why. And then, tell me the capacity and reason as to why they were managed in such a way as to force mass surgeries at once. Did the club bypass these surgical recommendations during finals to push for a flag? Or were the needs for surgery not determined until after? How does the club balance current team goals, with individual player welfare, alongside long term goals of the club and team?

3. What prompted -- and who drove -- the sign off on FD changes mid season? For example, were the poor performances alone enough to prompt it? Or was it a lack of chemistry between the team? I'd like this clarified and broken down. Then, who signed off and initiated it? Was is Mahoney initiating and prompting? Was it a recommendation (or order) from the board? Was it a collaborative conclusion by the board and FD? I want to know how these changes were implemented. 

4. What are the individual and team KPI's outlined in Simon Goodwin's contract extension? What are the consequences if these are consistently not met?

5. How confident is the club in establishing Jaguar as a long term partner? If confident, why. If not confident, why. Quantify, demonstrate and explain.

As members we need to ask questions that dig deeper beyond the corporate and PR speak. 

 

If we were a business. 

“We had a record profit and expected continued growth and profitability. Perhaps the biggest profit in 55 years.  

Unfortunately we lost a key employee and whilst we paid big $$ for a replacement it didn’t work out as their diligence in preparation for us wasn’t up to requirements.   

Another issue was scheduled leave for many of our key employees and some did not actually return until after their due date. When the employees did return, they were not at the same standard as last year.  Also other employees also went on leave, one of the highest scheduled leave rates in the industry.  It was decided to let some employees not return for the year at all so they could refresh for 2020. 

Our competition was prepared a lot more for us in 2019 and our products came up against tougher opposition. Despite winning in key market segments and product capability, it did not end up as bottom line sales that are the main point of our business. 

Our Managing Director extended his contract, but he seemed to only have one strategy which was better matched by competitors.  A mid year  management reshuffle was a strange move and appeared to confuse more than build confidence.  Some of our key markets saw products sell but just as the product was going to be a success, it fell apart in the 4th quarter to  make a loss. Our market position fell to rock bottom only above a Gold Coast based import export business which the Government will support to stay afloat. 

We will try to restore faith for our long list of faithful shareholders and customers and once again ask them to support us. We failed all our 2019 KPIs and made a record loss. Perhaps one of the largest profit to loss movements in company history. 

Our share price crashed and the sell off by industry investors and market commentators is extreme. But we think the core of our key employees and products that achieved the 2018 profits result, can be recovered.  We look to bring in a few new products, including some fast paced lines and a few young graduates with good results as employees. 

In 2020 our products will be matched against products which were not strong performers in 2019, and we hope to better manage leave.  Less unscheduled leave would also be a nice change.

Keep the faith with Demons Holdings Pty Ltd in 2020. “ 

 

 

What an odd thing to do really. It seems plucky on the first view but ...hell, Red etc would know...dont go asking questions ...or allow questions if the answers arent already known.

Im not really that much in favour of these style of events to be honest.  Surely the Club KNOWS what is wrong itself..surely. It just needs to get on with it . These fluff forums...rubbishy smokescreen in my view.

Another form of spin..what next


4 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

If we were a business. 

“We had a record profit and expected continued growth and profitability. Perhaps the biggest profit in 55 years.  

Unfortunately we lost a key employee and whilst we paid big $$ for a replacement it didn’t work out as their diligence in preparation for us wasn’t up to requirements.   

Another issue was scheduled leave for many of our key employees and some did not actually return until after their due date. When the employees did return, they were not at the same standard as last year.  Also other employees also went on leave, one of the highest scheduled leave rates in the industry.  It was decided to let some employees not return for the year at all so they could refresh for 2020. 

Our competition was prepared a lot more for us in 2019 and our products came up against tougher opposition. Despite winning in key market segments and product capability, it did not end up as bottom line sales that are the main point of our business. 

Our Managing Director extended his contract, but he seemed to only have one strategy which was better matched by competitors.  A mid year  management reshuffle was a strange move and appeared to confuse more than build confidence.  Some of our key markets saw products sell but just as the product was going to be a success, it fell apart in the 4th quarter to  make a loss. Our market position fell to rock bottom only above a Gold Coast based import export business which the Government will support to stay afloat. 

We will try to restore faith for our long list of faithful shareholders and customers and once again ask them to support us. We failed all our 2019 KPIs and made a record loss. Perhaps one of the largest profit to loss movements in company history. 

Our share price crashed and the sell off by industry investors and market commentators is extreme. But we think the core of our key employees and products that achieved the 2018 profits result, can be recovered.  We look to bring in a few new products, including some fast paced lines and a few young graduates with good results as employees. 

In 2020 our products will be matched against products which were not strong performers in 2019, and we hope to better manage leave.  Less unscheduled leave would also be a nice change.

Keep the faith with Demons Holdings Pty Ltd in 2020. “ 

 

 

Anyone short ASX:MFC would not be short squeezed post this announcement 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 50 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Like
    • 175 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 32 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

    • 546 replies
  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Clap
      • Haha
    • 287 replies