Jump to content

The youngest most inexperienced side

bandicoot
bandicoot
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

You have to take the good and the bad with teams like this. When we are high we play like schoolboy all stars but when we struggle (and I think we only really *struggled* twice this year, against Bombers and Saints), there is a massive dropoff. You have to expect that and be prepared for more games like that. 

The difference between this inexperienced side and the one from 2010, 2011 is that we have a really good contingency of experience: not too much, not too little, and better "ball winners" than we did then. 

I think we still might struggle agains a Hawthorn, West Coast and even Freo, but it's a learning curve and part of the process.

  • Quote
    •  
    15 minutes ago, ChaserJ said:

    It's quite extraordinary, isn't it?

    The last  time we tried to build through the draft (ultimately unsuccessfully) and go down the youth path, and the only point where it vaguely looked like we were on the road back was 2010.

    The peak of that rebuild was arguably the big Rd 17 win against Sydney.  Our age profile from then was:

    Average Attributes
      Melbourne Attribute Sydney  
    186.8cm Height 186.6cm
    84.2kg Weight 87.2kg
    23yr 4mth Age 25yr 10mth
    68.8 Games 104.1
     
     
    Total Players By Games
      Melbourne Games Sydney  
    3 Less than 50 1
    4 50 to 99 1
    5 100 to 149 5
    10 150 or more 15

     Our development program is so far ahead of what he had in place then it's not even funny, and the growth left in this team is scary.

    All things being equal, we're only seeing the earliest signs of what this team could do on a regular basis.

    Exciting stuff.

    And to think, for something that was only 5 & a half years ago, the only players from our 22 that day still on the list are Jones, Watts, Dunn & Garland.

  • Quote
    • 2 weeks later...

    Was just looking at the stats for this from the weekend, and once more I note that we fielded the youngest and least experienced team against the Hawks who fielded the 3rd oldest & 2nd most experienced team of the round.

    The stats actually make for some interesting reading.  Paints a good picture for us, Bulldogs, Adelaide & of course GWS.  And it makes things look pretty grim for the likes of Fremantle, Richmond, St Kilda (given their performance) and it also outs Carlton's efforts into perspective (as well as Bolton has done).

    AGE:

    North Melbourne 27 years 11 months

    Geelong 26 years 4 months

    Hawthorn 26 years 2 months

    West Coast 26 years flat

    Fremantle 25 years 9 months

    Carlton 25 years 7 months

    Sydney 25 years 6 months

    Richmond 25 years 6 months

    Essendon 25 years 2 months

    St Kilda 24 years 11 months

    Collingwood 24 years 8 months

    Port Adelaide 24 years 8 months

    Adelaide 24 years 7 months

    GWS 24 years 5 months

    Gold Coast 24 years 4 monhts

    Western Bulldogs 24 years 4 months

    Brisbane 24 years 4 months

    Melbourne 23 years 7 months

    GAMES EXPERIENCE

    North Melbourne 151.3

    Hawthorn 125.6

    Geelong 120.8

    West Coast 118.4

    Sydney 104.9

    Richmond 104.1

    Fremantle 103.1

    St Kilda 93.2

    Carlton 90.1

    GWS 87.1

    Collingwood 86.3

    Port Adelaide 86.1

    Essendon 84.5

    Adelaide 79 flat

    Gold Coast 79 flat

    Western Bulldogs 71.6

    Brisbane 71.3

    Melbourne 64.2

    North played a 22 that had more then double the games experience that we fielded.  We also fielded a team on average 9 months younger then any other in the comp.

    Encouraging signs of things to come hopefully!

  • Quote
    • Like 6
     

    is it correct that our ave games round 10 was 30 and last week it was 64.  big jump?

    or maybe im wrong

  • Quote

    It also shows the hole in our list and the worry about development, particularly in the backline, without senior players to help bring them through.

    Works both ways.

     

  • Quote

    Thanks for sharing. With Dawes, Trenners and AvB coming into that side it raised our average age by a little bit too.

    The average games played stat is the one that is important. This group of players with an average games played of 90 - 100 matches will be a very different beast.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    4 minutes ago, stuie said:

    It also shows the hole in our list and the worry about development, particularly in the backline, without senior players to help bring them through.

    Works both ways.

     

    They cannot get a game stuie.

  • Quote
    3 minutes ago, old dee said:

    They cannot get a game stuie.

    I'm saying the lack of them, not the quality of the ones we already have.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
      Total Games  Ave games
    Round 1 1382 62.82
    Round 2 1615 73.41
    Round 3 1490 67.73
    Round 4 1384 62.91
    Round 5 1653 75.14
    Round 6 1651 75.05
    Round 7 1399 63.59
    Round 8 1410 64.09
    Round 9 1273 57.86
    Round 10 1406 63.91
    Round 11 1412 64.18
  • Quote
    • Like 1
    3 minutes ago, stuie said:

    I'm saying the lack of them, not the quality of the ones we already have.

     

    I understand that, I think they are good enough.

  • Quote

    Just now, old dee said:

    I understand that, I think they are good enough.

    Huh? They're good enough but they can't get a game?

     

  • Quote
    1 minute ago, Eittocs12 said:
      Total Games  Ave games
    Round 1 1382 62.82
    Round 2 1615 73.41
    Round 3 1490 67.73
    Round 4 1384 62.91
    Round 5 1653 75.14
    Round 6 1651 75.05
    Round 7 1399 63.59
    Round 8 1410 64.09
    Round 9 1273 57.86
    Round 10 1406 63.91
    Round 11 1412 64.18

    This is why Oscar, Harmes, etc. are given games when they are perhaps not at their best. The coaches want to show faith in these boys and get them playing games together. Playing a Grimes might help us slightly in the short term, but it's all about building a side that can compete for higher stakes long term.

  • Quote
    5 minutes ago, Tough Kent said:

    This is why Oscar, Harmes, etc. are given games when they are perhaps not at their best. The coaches want to show faith in these boys and get them playing games together. Playing a Grimes might help us slightly in the short term, but it's all about building a side that can compete for higher stakes long term.

    They are the future, but they can't learn from each other. They need quality mature players to play alongside them. Development doesn't just automatically happen by playing games.

     

  • Quote
    4 minutes ago, Tough Kent said:

    This is why Oscar, Harmes, etc. are given games when they are perhaps not at their best. The coaches want to show faith in these boys and get them playing games together. Playing a Grimes might help us slightly in the short term, but it's all about building a side that can compete for higher stakes long term.

    I understand your point TK however I don't understand your graph.

    Is it meant to show we have a young side?

    If so good but don't we all know that?

  • Quote
    1 minute ago, stuie said:

    They are the future, but they can't learn from each other. They need quality mature players to play alongside them. Development doesn't just automatically happen by playing games.

     

    It happens with good coaching and by playing with good footballers. We are providing them with both.

  • Quote

    Just now, Tough Kent said:

    It happens with good coaching and by playing with good footballers. We are providing them with both.

    Not in the backline we're not, and that is my worry at the moment.

    Jetta is a legend, but at 26 he is 3 years older than our next oldest regular defender Tom McDonald who is regarded as the backline leader.

     

  • Quote
    2 minutes ago, old dee said:

    I understand your point TK however I don't understand your graph.

    Is it meant to show we have a young side?

    If so good but don't we all know that?

    Not my graph. I think the poster was answering a prior question about us having a side one week that had an average of 30 games played.

  • Quote
    11 minutes ago, Tough Kent said:

    Not my graph. I think the poster was answering a prior question about us having a side one week that had an average of 30 games played.

    Ok

    perhaps I should have engaged my brain before moving my fingers.

    Edited by old dee

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    17 minutes ago, Tough Kent said:

    This is why Oscar, Harmes, etc. are given games when they are perhaps not at their best. The coaches want to show faith in these boys and get them playing games together. Playing a Grimes might help us slightly in the short term, but it's all about building a side that can compete for higher stakes long term.

    I agree with this logic but am also wary that it is the same logic that brought us undone under Bailey.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

     

     

    6 minutes ago, stuie said:

    Not in the backline we're not, and that is my worry at the moment.

    Jetta is a legend, but at 26 he is 3 years older than our next oldest regular defender Tom McDonald who is regarded as the backline leader.

     

     If we had the best of both worlds (a great blend of youth and experience) we'd be a top 8 team. We don't, that's why we aren't able to play consistently against good sides. It will come.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Just now, Tough Kent said:

     If we had the best of both worlds (a great blend of youth and experience) we'd be a top 8 team. We don't, that's why we aren't able to play consistently against good sides. It will come.

    How will it come? Trading? Chucking all the kids in and playing them every week is not good development IMO.

    It's a never ending cycle if you just play kids who don't develop properly and then become the leaders to the next round of kids who won't develop properly because their leaders didn't.... Roos has talked a lot about this kind of scenario and it's what culture is all about.

     

  • Quote
    2 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    I agree with this logic but am also wary that it is the same logic that brought us undone under Bailey.

    Fair call. I think the development of players under the current coaching set up if far better. I also believe we have senior players around them who can help the team develop. We could do with some more experienced, quality players, but our list is a slow build and will take time.

  • Quote
    1 minute ago, Tough Kent said:

    Fair call. I think the development of players under the current coaching set up if far better. I also believe we have senior players around them who can help the team develop. We could do with some more experienced, quality players, but our list is a slow build and will take time.

    You had me up to the last last sentence TK.

    Then I got a big chill.

    I have heard that a few times before, please tell me it is different this time?

  • Quote
    •  
    1 minute ago, stuie said:

    How will it come? Trading? Chucking all the kids in and playing them every week is not good development IMO.

    It's a never ending cycle if you just play kids who don't develop properly and then become the leaders to the next round of kids who won't develop properly because their leaders didn't.... Roos has talked a lot about this kind of scenario and it's what culture is all about.

     

    Last thing I'll say on this because I haven't got all day to trade quotes with you Stuie. Our list will improve through trading, free agency and continued good drafting. And continuing to be patient. Your argument is flawed because our kids are developing, aren't they? Is the team not improving?

  • Quote
    2 minutes ago, old dee said:

    You had me up to the last last sentence TK.

    Then I got a big chill.

    I have heard that a few times before, please tell me it is different this time?

    Gosh, I bloody hope so!

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Essendon

      As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie? 
      Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG. Unfortunately, performances like these went against the grain of what Melbourne has been producing from virtually midway through 2024 and extending right through to the present day. This is a game between two clubs who have faltered over the past couple of years because their disposal efficiency is appalling. Neither of them can hit the side of a barn door but history tells us that every once in a while such teams have their lucky days or come up against an opponent in even worse shape and hence, one of them will come up trumps in this match.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Like
      • 255 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • 17 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Shocked
        • Like
      • 273 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All