Jump to content

AFL concerns about Demons

Featured Replies

 

Another rubbish Jon Pierik article, just ridiculous! Seriously, a few quotes from Andy D that really say nothing and a bit of padding as are all his articles!

Nice work after a 7 month witch hunt against the club that ended in a lunatic decision partly designed to save Vlad the embarrassment for setting the tanking controversy up in the first place.

 

Nice work after a 7 month witch hunt against the club that ended in a lunatic decision partly designed to save Vlad the embarrassment for setting the tanking controversy up in the first place.

The MFC was a party to that "lunatic decision".

The article should have focused more on what the MFC means to the AFL at present, including what the AFL's role in the club's long term should be. Instead he just adds a single quote from AD saying what he is expected to say, then rehashes old news.

I would prefer to read about what the AFL might be thinking behind doors, you'll never get a decent quote from anyone about it but you could at least frame the argument.

On that note, it will be interesting to see how the AFL treats us in the next few years, in terms of cash handouts, equalisation and priority picks. Especially given their recent commitment to the new clubs. To now I think the AFL has bad a foot in both camps, they're not prepared to force clubs out, but they're not really committed to effective assistance either.

My fear is they will only offer token assistance on those fronts, and we will continue to struggle. I don't think we are at risk of being folded in the short term, it will be a decade before they consider any change to the league lineup, but when that time comes, if we are travelling the same path as we are currently on, I can't see any other way but merge/move or fold.


The article should have focused more on what the MFC means to the AFL at present, including what the AFL's role in the club's long term should be. Instead he just adds a single quote from AD saying what he is expected to say, then rehashes old news.

I would prefer to read about what the AFL might be thinking behind doors, you'll never get a decent quote from anyone about it but you could at least frame the argument.

On that note, it will be interesting to see how the AFL treats us in the next few years, in terms of cash handouts, equalisation and priority picks. Especially given their recent commitment to the new clubs. To now I think the AFL has bad a foot in both camps, they're not prepared to force clubs out, but they're not really committed to effective assistance either.

My fear is they will only offer token assistance on those fronts, and we will continue to struggle. I don't think we are at risk of being folded in the short term, it will be a decade before they consider any change to the league lineup, but when that time comes, if we are travelling the same path as we are currently on, I can't see any other way but merge/move or fold.

From what I've heard they are not very complimentary but who really knows the truth of it.

we should have more concerns over the AFL then they over us .Perhaps if they apologized over Mifsud ,waived the $500000 fine and gave us a draft pick at the end of 2012 we wouldn't be so concerned .In reality the afl would like us and one other to fold and revert back to a 16 team comp that includes their 2 AFL teams .

 

Give us another priority pick, we need it more than ever!!

We will get pick 1 and 2 this year.


Thinking about not impartially, you can only imagine that Vlad and co are rubbing their hands together with glee.

There's four years to go in the current tv rights deal.

Four more years of incompetence and token subsistence support from the afl will see them frame the argument that two clubs should go from Melbourne.

Wouldn't surprise me at all to see the North Melbourne Bulldogs - a combination of three clubs to become one - be part of a 16 team competition from 2017.

Give us another priority pick, we need it more than ever!!

It's not a priority pick we need, it's an injection of spirit and a cure for the disease we have had for the last 50 years.

We have stuffed up enough 1st round picks already, what we need is access to some players at other clubs who are PERFORMING WELL not being delisted. We need to have enough salary cap to attract a Buddy or a couple of top line Midfielders and a coach like Paul Roos.

We need to recognise that the players don't like Casey and as long as we perform poorly, we won't attract 1 extra supporter.

BTW I heard Vlad make the comments and he seemed genuinely concerned; I think we are so shell-shocked at the moment we take every comment as a sign we are going to be wound up.

It's not a priority pick we need, it's an injection of spirit and a cure for the disease we have had for the last 50 years.

We have stuffed up enough 1st round picks already, what we need is access to some players at other clubs who are PERFORMING WELL not being delisted. We need to have enough salary cap to attract a Buddy or a couple of top line Midfielders and a coach like Paul Roos.

We need to recognise that the players don't like Casey and as long as we perform poorly, we won't attract 1 extra supporter.

How are they going to attract players from other clubs?

The article should have focused more on what the MFC means to the AFL at present, including what the AFL's role in the club's long term should be. Instead he just adds a single quote from AD saying what he is expected to say, then rehashes old news.

I would prefer to read about what the AFL might be thinking behind doors, you'll never get a decent quote from anyone about it but you could at least frame the argument.

On that note, it will be interesting to see how the AFL treats us in the next few years, in terms of cash handouts, equalisation and priority picks. Especially given their recent commitment to the new clubs. To now I think the AFL has bad a foot in both camps, they're not prepared to force clubs out, but they're not really committed to effective assistance either.

My fear is they will only offer token assistance on those fronts, and we will continue to struggle. I don't think we are at risk of being folded in the short term, it will be a decade before they consider any change to the league lineup, but when that time comes, if we are travelling the same path as we are currently on, I can't see any other way but merge/move or fold.

They want a team in Tassie.

If we remain a basket case for 3-5 more years ... I can see us being repackaged down there as the Tassie Devils.

They want a team in Tassie.

If we remain a basket case for 3-5 more years ... I can see us being repackaged down there as the Tassie Devils.

There will never be a team in tassie, no offence to the Apple Isle but AFL players wont live there.


How are they going to attract players from other clubs?

The AFL will have to have a lot of input in to the club for that to happen, both in terms of Management and Coaching.

If someone was giving me 250k - 500k to kick a Sherrin around ... absolutely!

What if someone offered you the same in Victoria?


What if someone offered you the same in Victoria?

They will set them up the same way GWS have been set up. Blokes will want to play there. You're coming to Melbourne every other week anyway.

They will set them up the same way GWS have been set up. Blokes will want to play there. You're coming to Melbourne every other week anyway.

You never answered the question?

You never answered the question?

I'd stay in Vic of course. But I was offered 150k more I'd go down there. You've got ten year at most in the sport. Make hay while the sun shines. You've 60 more years to live when the curtain falls.

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 12

    Round 12 kicks off with the Brisbane hosting Essendon at the Gabba as the Lions aim to solidify their top-two position against an injury-hit Bombers side seeking to maintain momentum after a win over Richmond. On Friday night it's a blockbuster at the G as the Magpies look to extend their top of the table winning streak while the Hawks strive to bounce back from a couple of recent defeats and stay in contention for the Top 4. On Saturday the Suns, buoyed by 3 wins on the trot, face the Dockers in a clash crucial for both teams' aspirations this season. The Suns want to solidify their Top 4 standing whilst the Dockers will be desperate to break into the 8.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 43 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    The media has performed a complete reversal in its coverage of the Melbourne Football Club over the past month and a half. Having endured intense criticism from all quarters in the press, which continually identified new avenues for scrutiny of every aspect, both on and off the field, and prematurely speculated about the departures of coaches, players, officials, and various employees from a club that lost its first five matches and appeared out of finals contention, the narrative has suddenly shifted to one of unbridled optimism.  The Demons have won five of their last six matches, positioning themselves just one game (and a considerable amount of percentage) outside the top eight at the halfway mark of the season. They still trail the primary contenders and remain far from assured of a finals berth.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 12 replies
  • REPORT: Sydney

    A few weeks ago, I visited a fellow Melbourne Football Club supporter in hospital, and our conversation inevitably shifted from his health diagnosis to the well-being of our football team. Like him, Melbourne had faced challenges in recent months, but an intervention - in his case, surgery, and in the team's case, a change in game style - had brought about much improvement.  The team's professionals had altered its game style from a pedestrian and slow-moving approach, which yielded an average of merely 60 points for five winless games, to a faster and more direct style. This shift led to three consecutive wins and a strong competitive effort in the fourth game, albeit with a tired finish against Hawthorn, a strong premiership contender.  As we discussed our team's recent health improvement, I shared my observations on the changes within the team, including the refreshed style, the introduction of new young talent, such as rising stars Caleb Windsor, Harvey Langford, and Xavier Lindsay, and the rebranding of Kozzy Pickett from a small forward to a midfield machine who can still get among the goals. I also highlighted the dominance of captain Max Gawn in the ruck and the resurgence in form in a big way of midfield superstars Christian Petracca and Clayton Oliver. 

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 9 replies
  • PODCAST: Sydney

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 26th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a crushing victory by the Demons over the Swans at the G. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.

      • Haha
    • 51 replies
  • POSTGAME: Sydney

    The Demons controlled the contest from the outset, though inaccurate kicking kept the Swans in the game until half time. But after the break, Melbourne put on the jets and blew Sydney away and the demolition job was complete.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 428 replies
  • VOTES: Sydney

    Max Gawn still has an almost unassailable lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award. Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Harvey Langford, Kade Chandler & Ed Langdon round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 46 replies