Jump to content

The Josh Caddy Thread

Featured Replies

Posted

This kid has been highly rated for a while now, but I expected him to go around pick 15-25.

He looked a little slow at times and that pushed him back behind the real athletes.

After his testing at the Draft Combine, he has proved to have exceptional speed and endurance which has probably been hidden by the nature of him being an inside player who ends up on the bottom of packs.

He also managed to finish as the best performer in the new Handball test. BP has mentioned his performance and spoken of how important he personally rated this test for judging cleanness with the footy, moreso than the kicking test.

He also mentioned that we interviewed Josh on the final day, indicating he may have entered into consideration.

It has been mused that he may have entered into top 10 status with his performance at the Combine.

I think it more likely that he is now on the cusp. He could easily end up being one of the few considered at our pick, even though he is not exactly a 'needs' type.

It is often said that the difference with a lot of the great players is how clean they are with the footy.

Gotta say he's another I'd be happy to end up with.

Any opinions?

 

How tall is he out of interest?

Sounds great as a package - a ball extractor with awesome hands who is also very quick and is hard by nature.

Sounds a lot like a young man we have already ... and I'm saying one more can't hurt.

Like the sounds of this kid and if our desired KPP isn't available, jump on him.

Good work E

I actually watched him play a couple of times with Marcellin (his old school) and the Knights.

Too good for school footy and was serviceable against the Suns in one of the matches I saw.

Not overly tall, lovely kick but there was no....sparkle? I don't want to malign the kid, but we've probably got too many players his size ....

 
  • Author

Yeah, I know what you mean. Not much pizazz and I'm not certain on his 'hurt factor'.

He's a meat & potatoes type, but I did read him somewhere saying he'd always been used as an inside type and really wanted to work on his outside game and breaking the lines.

He has the tools.

I guess if he had the flash & creativity side sorted, he'd be taken by the Suns in the first 3.

Edited by E25


What parts of your game would you like to improve?

I would like to improve the outside features of my game. If I could improve my position to receive more ball it would complement my inside work. Also, I need to improve my decision making when being tackled and release the ball quicker.

Sounds a bit like Nathan Jones, I think we have a few inside mids and probably need a few really good finishers a bit of class outside the packs.

  • Author

Just going by that short passage could be deceptive, but even if he is like Jones, one thing he has over him is proven speed.

Caddy scored 2 x sub 3 second 20m sprints.

If Jones had that burst of speed it would make him a much better player.

Edited by E25

Just going by that short passage could be deceptive, but even if he is like Jones, one thing he has over him is proven speed.

Caddy scored 2 x sub 3 second 20m sprints.

If Jones had that burst of speed it would make him a much better player.

What did Jones do, and what does he do now?
 

My preference would be to secure a tall forward in this draft and it would seem that at pick # 12 we are well placed to snare a good one. However, it would appear that there are about half a dozen mid sized players likely to be taken in our range and if the quality is there, why not?

I suppose that leads to the question whether we could collect another pick in the late teens or early 20s. Problem is nearly everyone else will want the same thing and these draft picks come at a cost.

The question will be whether we want to pay.

  • Author

Totally agree.

I had hoped Jones would go because I think he would get that sort of compensation.

Warnock is maybe not enough, but we may be able to include our 2nd round pick & get something else back.

Hard to say.

I doubt either Hawthorn or the Blues would want to part with their 1st picks, but that's what we should demand.


This kid has been highly rated for a while now, but I expected him to go around pick 15-25.

He looked a little slow at times and that pushed him back behind the real athletes.

After his testing at the Draft Combine, he has proved to have exceptional speed and endurance which has probably been hidden by the nature of him being an inside player who ends up on the bottom of packs.

He also managed to finish as the best performer in the new Handball test. BP has mentioned his performance and spoken of how important he personally rated this test for judging cleanness with the footy, moreso than the kicking test.

He also mentioned that we interviewed Josh on the final day, indicating he may have entered into consideration.

It has been mused that he may have entered into top 10 status with his performance at the Combine.

I think it more likely that he is now on the cusp. He could easily end up being one of the few considered at our pick, even though he is not exactly a 'needs' type.

It is often said that the difference with a lot of the great players is how clean they are with the footy.

Gotta say he's another I'd be happy to end up with.

Any opinions?

The more mids pushing into the top 10 the better IMO, that'll push some Talls out to 12. The better Quality Talls, all the better.

If we pickup another pick,,, 18/19 or 21/22,,, I'd be rapt & then that may change things re the tall at 12.

My preference would be to secure a tall forward in this draft and it would seem that at pick # 12 we are well placed to snare a good one. However, it would appear that there are about half a dozen mid sized players likely to be taken in our range and if the quality is there, why not?

I suppose that leads to the question whether we could collect another pick in the late teens or early 20s. Problem is nearly everyone else will want the same thing and these draft picks come at a cost.

The question will be whether we want to pay.

ditto Jack.

Edited by dee-luded

Sounds like the lad has talent, but don't think he'd be what we're after.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 244 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 40 replies