Deecisive
Members-
Posts
1,980 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Deecisive
-
just the sort of small forward that we need.
-
Poll: Who do you want with our first two picks?
Deecisive replied to furious d's topic in Melbourne Demons
Thanks for the link Wattsy, not bad but i still think stephens highlights are better. -
his kicking did not look that bad from the highlights i have seen. I like the dash he provides when he has the ball. that is something we sorely miss. too often melbourne players stop and look sideways and even backwards instead of charging forward. I think he is a pretty good player now who will now be a lot more hungry for a chance to play again. he does not cost a draft pick, we are crackers if we dont have a serious shot at getting this guy.
-
Poll: Who do you want with our first two picks?
Deecisive replied to furious d's topic in Melbourne Demons
i have not seen any clips of Kemp and what he could do, shame about that. of those videos i have seen both young and stephens appear to be standouts. I would love to see stephens running off the half forward line, he has speed, skill, pace and knows where the goals are. i think he would be preferable to us going after a small forward as he could also play on the wing and rotate through the middle. -
Small forwards - what are our trading and draft options?
Deecisive replied to Pates's topic in Melbourne Demons
i'm not sold on us trying to take a small forward with our picks. there is nothing to say a mid size player cannot also kick goals. We have a few small guys dont waste a top 10 pick on a 20+ rated player. -
poor bugger, his indiscretion, that the AFL will no longer consider an indiscretion.
-
i agree the Kelly deal was a failure, to try to repeat it by swapping a top pick for two lesser picks is just plain dumb, and proves we have learnt nothing. We have done reasonably well with our recruiting so far this draft, if we can get bennell and maybe another top free agent we will be well ahead of last year. We can then use pick 3 and 8 to get the two best players available. that would mean 5-6 new players into our starting line up next year..
-
use the minimum number of picks we need to satisfy draft requirements. 3, 8 and 97, or if we split 3 and get 8, ?, ? and forget 97. get the best DFA's around some of these are reasonably good mature quality players who just need another chance. I think this is a better approach than taking some kid at 97 and beyond.
-
WELCOME TO THE MELBOURNE FOOTBALL CLUB - LUKE JACKSON
Deecisive replied to Lord Nev's topic in Melbourne Demons
i forward who cannot kick, sounds like he is made for us to take at 3. -
so we dont play Jake any more?
-
Agreed we should be seeing if we can pick him up, that would mean that we dont have to waste our draft picks on another small forward so that we can take the best possible players with our two picks.
-
if he is available take him. this guy will be hungry to play and get back to AFL football. We need players hungry to play, not just feeling they are safe because our list is thin. He now knows what the downside of his bad behavior he is very unlikely to do it again.
-
I agree make Carlton think we can pay a hefty sum year one, so that they have to more heavily load their first year. then see how his team mates at carlton think about how much he is getting paid when their contracts come up for renewal, especially if he is not playing well, or injured.
-
Hayden Young (Drafted by Fremantle)
Deecisive replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Melbourne Demons
if he is an accurate kick why not try him out on the wing, that way he is likely to be able to also get a few kicks at goal. We need a winger who can add to our scoring capability. -
well if nothing else push carlton to pay him heaps...
-
Compensation for Loss of NT Academy Zone
Deecisive replied to The Great Pretender's topic in Melbourne Demons
The AFL is likely to give melbourne a major boost by giving them to right to recruit from all the area between Victoria and Tasmania. A massive greatly undeveloped area.- 54 replies
-
- 14
-
demons just need to play well in 2020, show we are capable of winning a premiership and that may just change his mind a little.
-
definitely like stephens, then kemp or young. if we can land martin, or bennell with sam murray then i would go with kemp because i think we could wait for him.
-
now if we can land martin, bennell and murray that would be a pretty good outcome.
-
i do like the look of stephens would certainly be happy to take him at 3. he looks as if he can give us some run around the ball and up forward. kemp also looks good downside being his already out for the year.
-
the team around you makes all the difference, deGoohy has team mates that can deliver the ball to him. Trac has to go out and fetch it.
-
we may not get green but we can certainly get the next best player after green instead of letting him go off to GWS and make them even stronger.
-
give him more time and play him forward at Casey, as well as ruck. He needs to improve his marking if he can do that he will be a major asset. we all know the headache cox for collingwood causes for us, i would like to see Preuss do something similar but more consistently.
-
looking at the highlights of flanders i dont know if this was a good day or a bad day for him but i only saw about 3 kicks that actually went cleanly to a team mate. a lot of hurried kicks just down the field to opposition players. So he would certainly fit in to our current team like that, but i would prefer if we can get someone who can actually deliver the ball to a team mate with greater efficiency than he has shown.
-
not a fan of splitting the pick, we have two top 10 players we can pick, these are the best players. best opportunity to pick up two good players, to trade one away for a couple of less talented players seems wrong. would you want to give GWS a possible cripps so that we can get to more average players.