olisik

They would have to take it, its not like they can get any better offers then pick #4 by the time trading occurs. Though if they know this before hand, they can bid on Viney and then trade MD2 to bulldogs as pick #5 would become #4 anyway. (Alot more beating around the bush but GWS probably would do this)

I dont understand why his family cant just move to melbourne. I mean didn't they just relocate to Adelaide because of the family issues? Why didn't they just relocate to Melb instead for Liam. Im sure the MFC would've helped them out a bit like they did for Clark's missus.

definetely a loss if he goes, most consistent MFC player over the past few years. I honestly think that he is a leader of the side despite being dropped from leadership group. He battles hard every game, the type of player who is priceless imo.

Gday HG Dont be like that.

Any relations?

Any idea if we are even half keen on stringer?

Like everyone else on this site I have my sources. Believe or not, your call. After hearing about it though I thought it was a feasibility, he would be in our best 22 when uninjured. Not sure what we would give up for him. Pick 13 would be to much imo. Maybe a late 2nd rounder we secure through other trades/FA compo + Petterd? *Shrugs*

Apparently Rischitelli is a possibility. Could also be the incentive needed for JV to slip through

Im glad he isn't our list manager. 50 names rubbed out would be quite awkward.

I think de-listing players or putting them on trade table early is a stroke of genius. No other clubs are doing it so it putting us ahead of the pack. Managers can go shopping for them already and get value for players we would have thought previously untradeable such as Cook. Ideally the players managers are doing alott of work for us as they want to look after the players and by doing that it would be to find a suitable home with a suitable trade scenario that works both ways. Other teams know whats on the table now so they can formulate their own scenarios around these plays in order to secure them without any other team having players on the table yet. The rumors players are unhappy is probably true, hell id be pretty unhappy if i was about to be sacked to.

Toumpas, Viney, Kennedy, Garlett will be left for us

You want to ban 50 people? Thank god your not a mod...

Constantly writing long posts bagging out our teams coach with no hard evidence in almost every thread is not trolling then I don't know what is. Its fair to be dismissive of posts like that in my opinion. Though guess my opinion doesn't count though based on your hypocritical post. See-ya Robbie

Firstly name the players of the 1 3rd your talking about or name your source. You need evidence to backup statements like that or end of the day they are trash as anyone can say anything. Secondly its Petterd Thirdly the guy played 54 games and only 1, maybe 2 decent games. With that strike rate its no wonder we are at the bottom of the ladder. Fourthly if it is Neeld and not the players, then which way do you point your finger about 186? Bailey or the players?

Yes, ok, a post about bagging out Neeld and a post talking about losing defenders is the same thing now....

Carlton supports on bigfooty seem to think Carlton are keen on Petterd.

Loss instead of lose is much different to Magnor, Trengrove, Pettard, Jarrah ect Also its the post itself that is trash not specifically the spelling, that just added to it.

We wont lose Dunn, Strauss, Seller and Rivers. Thats half our defenders, we ll keep 3/4 of them I would say for depth at a minimum.

I read somewhere that Kennedy from Syd is uncontracted, how has this slipped under the radar...

Firstly learn to spell and your posts may be slightly more credible then trash. Secondly those players you listed as your strongest arguments do not help much to help your case. How did Jurrah go backwards under Neeld? How has Morton gone backwards under Neeld? Thirdly you need to stop trolling and saying the same thing in every thread, your posts get old fast, especially when you cant even spell players names correctly and have absolutely no knowledge of what goes on inside the club.

No wonder those footy shorts look so loose on Eddie all the time

But Port indicated yesterday it would not be a candidate for the services of departing Demon Brent Moloney, a free agent who has told Melbourne he wants to pursue opportunities elsewhere. Advertisement Moloney, 28, was high on Primus' list of potential experienced recruits, but interest from Port is believed to have waned since his departur Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/boak-to-remain-with-power-in-13m-deal-20120904-25cm3.html#ixzz25Y340L1n

Yep and holding onto players like Cook does not = action.

By the right price, i mean a early to mid 2nd rounder. I highly doubt we would offload him for anything less

I think he is a 'fringe' trade/delist player. For the right price he'll be traded If not traded and we need to free up some space he ll be delisted. If not we will keep.