Demon Dynasty

It could've gone either way depending on the time keeper's mood i reckon. Oh. A request. Any chance we can change the header to 'Demons vs Hawks' mate?? Personally i hate that term. What is a Dee anyway?

Melbourne vs Port Power Round 17, 2011 - Experience Stats Total games played by Team Demons - 1,274 Power – 1,906 Average games played per player Demons - 58 Power – 87 Average Height of Teams Demons - 187cm Power – 186cm Average Weight of Teams Demons - 85kg Power – 87kg Average games played by category 0-49 Demons - 22 / 13 (average games/number of players) Power - 18 / 8 50-99 Demons - 61 / 3 Power - 78 / 5 100+ Demons – 134 / 6 Power - 155 / 9 Stats Courtesy of footywire.com

There was another stat that i heard on SEN last week. The average interchange per game hasn't changed from last year, with players receiving less recovery time on the bench (on average). Don't hold me to this particular stat, but last year it was something like 1minute 30 sec on average on the bench versus this year approx 30 seconds. Obviously less time on the bench has allowed the FDs to maintain their interchange numbers but one wonders at what cost to the players' welfare. The extra fatigue factor and lack of rest/recovery time from this fatiguing could go some way towards explaining the increase in injuries/break downs this year compared to last. Albeit we shouldn't place too much emphasis on one year's data and one year's attempt to adjust to the new sub rule.

I really can't see Mick coming over. IF. and it's a BIG IF, he decides to leave the Pies prior to his 2 year role with the Pies expiring then to my way of thinking...... 1. His heart lays with the Tigers not the Demons. If he's going to see his days out somewhere to me it would be in a role similar to that of Bomber Thompson at the Tigers assisting Hardwick. He has stated his heart lies at the Tigers (still), where he spent the bulk of his playing days and played in a premiership. 2. I just don't think we'd have the budget to bring him and his entourage over, either as head coach or Director/Assistant role to Bailey in a Thompson/Essendon type set up. 3. He's supposedly signed a 2 year contract with the Pies already. Seems to be a strong man of principle and word. Doubt he'd go back on that. The only SLIM possible chance i see in a Mick/Melbourne partnership is a Thompson type role alongside or overseeing Bailey. However, he would have to be willing to accept something less than what he'd be getting at the Pies and probably alot less than Thompson, in order for us to accommodate him. Does anyone here think he loves the Demons enough to do that in his twilight years?

+1 here Worth a try. Personally i feel Max has more "tap" ruck potential in him than Martin. More so once he gets his AFL legs/strength over a few more pre-seasons, he might be more of a danger/threat up forward when resting than Martin. Martin's been beaten in the tap ruck area (by this i'm referring to hit outs to advantage) against mediocre opposition in recent weeks, such as Wood (Pies) and Hudson (Doggies). I think Browne (Richmond) was a reasonable win for Martin, but given his opponents relative inexperience (9 games vs Martin's 40), a likely one. I also felt Max did a slightly better job against the Pies when he was used in the ruck to rest Martin. Agree re: top heavy comment also. Risky bringing in 3 big guys. Maybe Gawn as sub to bring on for Martin in the 2nd half as a comparison and for a fresh bod in the heat. I don't think Jurrah has earned his place this week but will no doubt be named for the crowd factor i guess. Personally i'd prefer to see him play off the bench and through the middle to get his work rate up and hopefully keep him more switched on to the role being asked. One of which you would hope is chasing/pressuring on more occasions when he doesn't have the ball, which he has shown he can do pretty well when he puts his mind to it.

Anyone watch the Dawks - Pies game last week? There was no standard. Just a constant bias toward paying frees to the Pies, that in most cases weren't legitimate, or ignoring those that should have been paid to the Dawks. Many absolute clanging 'holding the ball' decisions that should have been paid against the Pies, that were ignored and went unpaid also. One in particular, where the Pies player was swung around 360 on their HFF, brought to the ground, dropped the ball momentarily, picked it up again just after the tackle, and went on to short pass to Cloke who scored a goal (that shouldn't have been). I'm not saying the Dawks would have won or got close, but how the hec is any team supposed to have a chance against the big boys when they're getting this kind of out and out bias most weeks and extra goals/scores as a result. It would seem that the AFL, through their umpiring fraternity, is pushing an agenda of paying the obvious or ignoring the obvious towards the major money spinning clubs such as the Pies, any Etihad home team (Doggies etc and those that are playing against a true Etihad non-tenant...like us) and the interstate clubs at their home games. The umpiring against the Cats tonight is so biased towards the Weagles. 3 Frees out of the middle and 1 around the ground to Cox for holding against Ottens where IMO the decision was 50/50 play on. And that's just to half time. The Cats had a 2 - 3 goal advantage half way through the first too. IMO these frees brought the Weagles back into the match when they were against the ropes early. Many obvious Eagle throws unpaid or ignored too, as well as a few holding the ball massive 360's (as well as one where the player was 360'd and threw the ball away with one hand lol) or where the player was brought to ground after having prior and made no attempt whatsoever to dispose of the ball. Not sure why we even have a 'holding the ball' rule anymore as the absolute clear ones are rarely ever paid now, let alone the standard ones from days past. Very little reward for tackling anymore apart from the odd turnovers to advantage. And mostly there's downside, given that the tackler has a strong chance of hurting his opponent's head (sling tackles/tough tackling) when bringing to ground or just in the tackle generally and being outed for weeks for rough play etc. Another example, Cats player awarded free kick on boundary inside Weagles 50, kicks ball from inside boundary. Umpire claims the ball was kicked from inside the boundary, so it's out of bounce, ball up. Weagles eventually score a goal. Compare this to a decision in last 30 sec of 2nd quarter... Weagles player takes a mark under pressure on the wing right on the boundary line. Kicks ball from inside boundary (ie., not over the line at any stage exactly the same as Cats player earlier), umpire calls play on, no ball up. This game is now almost unwatchable, and unwinnable depending on who/where you're playing, unless you have a spiflicatingly most awesome team that overcomes even this massive bias. Unfortunately we don't at this point lol. There's an automatic 4 - 5 goal advantage when playing interstate teams, like the Weagles, at their home grounds now and something similar (maybe 3 - 4) against Etihad home teams (where they're playing a non co-tenant like us). That's a huge advantage even to a mediocre team like the Dogs, let alone a team pushing into the top 4 like the Weagles. If the Cats are struggling against this advantage, no wonder we're getting pumped in these situations atm. Not just this year either. It's been around for many years now, but seems a little more accentuated this year. It's just too consistent and obvious week after week for there not to be some sort of agenda, whether it's brought about through implied pressure or direct pressure, it's definitely a factor that contributes to the turning of certain matches from week to week.

Could be something in this. He was definitely out to get Trengove. The Monday morning before the MRP panel was due to sit, he made a statement that Trenners wasn't just likely to be sighted and had a case to answer for, but "that he will be sighted and he will be suspended for that....no question!". The next morning, before listening to his "opening rant" i was thinking to myself that KB was on a mission here and that he would most likely launch into Trengove claiming how crazy the MRP's decision was to let him off. Sure enough, on cue, that's exactly what he ranted on about in the opening. I sent a txt having a go at him and asking where he was after Corey had laid a more dangerous 'spear' tackle the week before. Of course the txt went unheralded even though i sent it within a minute of him finishing his rant. Although i also suggested he was probably still in a foul mood as the Tiges got smashed and we beat them the the week before, hence he was grumpy with anyone/anything Blues/Demons. I also suggested that he go back to bed and try getting out the other side! A stubborn old bugger when it comes to his view. According to him every rule the Rules Committee has come up with is perfect both in its design off the field and black and white when being ruled on by the umpires on the field (or should that be yellow & black?).

First point is quite valid. Was left a heavily recycled/ageing team that had in many cases seen their best years. Although i think we could have used the services of Jmac and Robbo for at least one more year or 2 while we were bringing through/blooding the new boys, winning a few more contests and hopefully instilling a more winning culture as the young guys grew physically and gained experience around them. It's a fine line between being bold and being too bold to the point of self harm. Which current players from the Daniher era are you referring to?? I've yet to see it on any consistent basis. 1 out of 4 against interstate clubs last year on their home turf and 3 of those clubs finished within 2 places of us. Not that i was expecting too much last year away from home. One win against a low ebbing Brisbane (Fev unraveling on and off field and quite an inexperienced team as well) towards the end of last year is hardly an indicator that we are playing better footy away from home. This year's fixture IMO couldn't have been much easier for us both generally and from an interstate away view. Only 3 games against interstate clubs on their home turf, and one of those against GCS. We failed dismally in the 2nd of these against the Weagles and we have one left against Port in the last game on a ground they've never played on either, albeit in their home town. I would say we'd have to win both of the remaining interstate games against Port, Darwin (neutral territory) and Adelaide Oval, just to break even in the interstate away stakes, given the easy interstate away draw we were gifted. And even then it wouldn't really be a true indicator of how we're travelling away, given the form of Port Power atm. Unfortunately we wont really get an idea of whether we're improving here until 2012 now.

Good point on the Bumbers. One thing i'd like to add though. They also brought a massive 'attack on the ball, win the clearance and play on at all costs' attitude which appeared to catch the Cats napping a little in the 2nd half of the first quarter and the 2nd. They played the game as if it was their grand final. And it worked in their favour. I only wish we could bring that attitude more often. Extra physical maturity/experience will see this happen i hope. Not sure about the whatsoever comment. I'd find it hard to believe that no one has talent within the FD. Do we feel this way when we smash our opponents? The FD must be doing something right in these games surely. However, there are positional moves/match ups that worry me. I guess that can be said about any coach post match. The old hindsight is a wonderful thing theory. But a few from Friday night.... Our best/most dangerous goal kicking forward in Green, played through the middle and even down back for much of the game and IMO wasted. Surely Sylvia should have played or been switched into this role when things started going awry for us from about half way through the first quarter. Instead Sylvia played approx 70/30 forward/guts. Surely leave Green (our most potent/experienced forward) up forward for most of the match to provide a lead/hit up/bail out target and also put a bit more pressure on his opponent i50. Playing AJ in the forward line. In fact i wouldn't have played him at all on this ground unless i was trialing him off the bench through the middle in short spurts and occasionaly pushing forward. As much as i'm not a big Dunny brush fan atm, i think he has an AFL size bod and could at least provide a target and a little more pressure i50 that AJ seems to only bring on the downhill slide or when the moment takes him. And no, he wasn't alone on Friday eve i realise. On the bigger grounds such as the G, AJ mostly up forward but a good percentage in the middle as well. Sometimes the best way of learning 'how to' is to watch. A mentor to sit alongside him while watching/learning would be handy i think. Our i50 pressure/tackling on Friday evening was woeful and a big reason why we lost so badly. Need to find more players who are committed/capable of bringing this week in week out or at least make it a non negotiable for anyone who wishes to maintain there place for more than a few weeks. Morton selected? Not suited to this ground and it's tight confines. Not ready or up to AFL standard yet, period. Evans/Bartram in for Morton at least on this ground. And no i don't think Bartram is a long term answer either. But he loves a contest and can get to one. Morton too slow. Bennell selected? Don't need outside runners like Morton and Bennell at Shi!yhad. Out for Maric or someone else, someone who loves an inside stoush and hard ball clearance! Unfortunately Tappy wasn't ready this time around so i'm not sure who we could have brought in at this point. Others may have a better idea for last Friday's match. Finally, we watched a mediocre but more experienced/physically mature opposition get on top (again), yet the FD continued the match with a predominantly "steady as she goes" strategy while the Scraggers proceeded to take over through the middle, attack the ball with more gusto and take the initiative (with the assistance of their wise coach at the helm and the inclusion of a few experienced campaigners). It appears that we STILL lack 'option B' and 'C' when things aren't going well. One of these options surely has to be .... the ability to close down our opposition when the tide starts turning against us. Where we attempt to slow things down, maintain possession and minimise the damage, until we're able to reset at the end of a quarter.

Agree on the more mature bigger bodied aspect re last night. Not a top side though. To me one part of this plan should be not to play too many outside players the likes of Bennell/Morton on tight smaller grounds like this. And if we're going to keep playing this style of running the ball off our half back line, then you're going to need some damn quick players coming off that half back line and they'll also need sublime kicking skills. Bennell may be handy on the bigger grounds where he can find space and others can find him free and he can burn off his opponent, but on the confines of Etihad, i don't believe he's capable. Neither is Morton. Too slow and loping, easily caught and pressured. Also doesn't like the hard one on one contact like Bennell. And you are going to need this in your game to play smaller grounds (and even the bigger ones too a lessor degree). There's no avoiding it. Eventually you're going to have to go when it's your turn and crack in. This is where Davey is a huge loss for us i feel. I didn't like what happened against the Saints either, but a player who does what he does through the zones and press, is very hard to cover/replace. And he could/can lay a decent tackle and pressure the ball carrier when he's on, unlike Morton and Bennell. IMO we need 2 - 3 Davey types (with an extra injection of courage) running off the half back line, breaking the lines and finding their way through the press zone with speed and sublime passing skills, mostly by foot, if the FD insist on continuing with this half back running game plan. If we can't, IMHO we're going to need a fairly massive change in game/plan strategy going forward if we're to make any substantial progress with this team in the coming years.

I personally believe our ruck division has been somewhat ordinary versus medium to quality opponents on game day (yes even when we have 2 against 1). We may get more hit outs overall on the day (i think we may have even had more vs the Pies but don't hold me to this, a great effort by Martin given where he came from mind you) however, it's the effective hit outs to advantage to me that count rather than just a total number of hit outs overall. I'm not judging Rush too harshly over last night though, as he's been out a fair while. Takes any player a good 3 - 4 matches to find their fitness and the pace of the game at this level after being out for 6 weeks or so. I think he'll get better as the year progresses. But as an example, If you watch the Pies game, Wood beat Martin early in effective taps to advantage which got them going and gave their play makers plenty of first usage, bringing many of them into the game early. I know the Pies are an unfair comparison given their massive advantage in physical maturity/experience/talent, but they are the benchmark atm (along with the Cats) and we could do worse than looking at what they do well. We also lack 2nd 3rd efforts from too many players far too often, including some of our veterans at times, in most games when the opposition is half decent or better. Our first efforts are generally commendable. But its what happens after this IMO that is letting us down too often. The opposition probably sense/see/feel this during the game (and may well be told to apply themselves accordingly pre match and they'll eventually break us down). Probably thrive and feed off it and grow an extra leg when they see/sense that it's working. Not hard last night given we had the most rookies in for the whole year i realise. What worries me going forward with the present FD is the apparent lack of an alternative strategy/game plan to slow the game down and try for a momentum change when other teams get a run on, in order to limit their scoring rate/opportunities while they're hot. In addition i would also say that playing at Etihad is extremely difficult given the leg up that any home team gets there from the Ump. I'm not saying this is an excuse for our poor overall effort and the final result last night but it doesn't help. Personally i think it's a 3 - 4 goal advantage. And one last thing, we don't act in unison as ONE team in a professional manner, for long enough and often enough. As one example of this - When the Cats tackle and their opponent is over the ball, other Cat players close to that contest as well as the player tackling, will often appeal to the Ump for a free kick and place pressure on the Umpire to make a decision. And they often get it! When our players tackle an opponent and he's over the ball, no other players of ours around the contest appeal for the free kick, including the tackler, in most cases. There are rare cases, but usually it's just the tackler. A minor point, but to me all these little 1 percenters add up and can make a small but meaningful difference to outcomes over the long haul.

Only you & Bennell that are feeling down today huh Old Dee!?? Not so bad then haha Me today >>> And last night (as i was tossing and turning in and out of nightmarish replays of the game with the after effects of a few frothies thrown in the mix) >>> Don't worry mate.... we're on track to do a Geelong by 2015!! At least that's what i've been led to believe!

Couldn't agree more. Some of the match ups strategically and structurally were abysmal last night. Our best forward from the previous 2 weeks playing up the ground and down back where he often monsters the ball with a few forward pushes. And Sylvia, who should have been doing the opposite (ie., 70% or so in the guts/30% pushing forward or therabouts) was left up forward adding little value. AJ was getting a towel up from Murphy but lets leave him there for most of the game and move him into the middle once the result is beyond doubt? I don't rate the Scraggers either, although they did have approx 400 games experience on us, albeit up to our game, horribly out of form. And no i don't count the GCS win. 20 odd points isn't really a win against that mob at this point. Our coaching dept has yet to inspire and structure up our boys to Find a Way To Win (FAWTW) when the going gets tough. And by that i mean once a team like the scraggers gets a run on, we seem unable to shut them down and change the momentum of a game. We just go along with the same game style/set up hoping that we'll out score the opposition at some point and/or turn things around. Great teams FAWTW when the chips are down and things aren't going their way. It's mental and it's process driven, along with experience. Eventually we'll gain the experience. I'm more worried about the mental/process side with this team given the damage that might occur between now and then.

6 - Frawley (General down back and 2 goals against him [3 but 1 was complete BS] on a monster who was getting massive feed all night. 5 - Trengove (Stood up when the going got tough and never took a backward step. Overpowered eventually with weight of numbers, as was the rest of the team). 4 - Petterd (Presented time after time and worked hard all night. Needs to learn to hold on to his overhead marking attempts, seems to get under the ball a little too often, with his one screamer the outstanding exception). 3 - Howe (Not the greatest game, however he continues to work his butt off and not just offering leads, he works to assist and spread too. Only 4 games under his belt before last night yet his work ethic and finish put others like AJ & Sylvia to shame. They should hang their heads. Shows maturity way beyond a new rookie. Keep it going mate) 2 - Jones (wouldn't normally give votes on this performance but there was so little else to choose from). 1 - Watts (for trying to play as a stop gap utility in virtually every position on the ground. His head must be spinning after this role. Whatever role was asked of him that is. This is a vote to encourage him to keep going and not lose hope after such a pitiful coaching performance!)

I agree. There's absolutely nothing to be gained by revealing strategies pre match or during the game, no matter how basic/disguised we might try to dress them as. Bailes was interviewed on SEN just before the game. Dermie asked "Now you see tackling tonight as a big part of how to break down the Doggies quick ball use/run & carry yeh?" (or something to that effect). Bailes' response.... "not tackling as such, more the inferred pressure on the ball carrier, followed up with tackling where we can get to them" (or something to that effect). And to me that's how they played. Second to the ball, chasing all night, apparently trying to place some "inferred pressure" on the ball carrier. Wouldve been joy to Rodney's ears that comment (if he or someone was listening at that late stage which i doubt). But still. Why give it? And these nonsense interviews of players during the actual game on the boundary. What a load of crap. Can only play into the oppositions hands and take our boys' focus off what they should be doing surely. Neil Balme when asked why the Cats don't do this during the week on KB's show, said he sees no good reason in doing this. Nothing to be gained and just laughed whenever anyone kept pressing him on the potential benefits. Now, when the most successful club in recent times isn't doing it, why the hell are we? We know better? Jimma/MFC/FD (someone!!!) needs to put a stop to this rubbish immediately.

In one contest tonight in our 50, both him and Air J went up for a contested mark. Ball spilled to a doggy who took off. Neither of them could be bothered chasing. They both took a stride or 2 towards the opponent and thought about it for a split second....then.....nah Is the story of many in our team this year, including other seniors too. Moloney and Jones included. No 2nd/3rd efforts often enough. Make the first one, then watch as other players run off with the spillage and/or spread and look to receive for a follow up pass by hand or foot. Same thing happened in the match against the Pies. When the ball's in close and nearby sure, we tackle and harass as hard as any team. In tonight's case unfortunately that was mostly from behind as we watched our opponents play in front and attack the ball/take the initiative. Makes the job to get first touch on the ball pretty hard i reckon. Serious pressure/run applied and our stomach for the 2nd/3rd efforts seems to dwindle away. Culture/Fitness problem?? The FD and players aren't getting paid enough to sort it maybe? Surely not. Or as Old Dee always says, we just don't have the talent/aren't good enough. I hope not. Maybe it's the fact we had the most rookies (49 games or less) in the team for the year, 14 to be exact vs the Doggies 8. Does this explain the effort though? Especially after losing Wighty. Respect/Honour? Something is seriously NQR at this club, and hasn't been, for a mighty long time now. Will "X" number of extra games under our boys' belt, X number of pre-seasons and years in the gym solve the problem? Why is it that we just don't seem to be able to win when we're expected to in many cases? And we were expected to tonight as we were favorites with the bookies pre match and most tipsters that i heard were tipping us to win. Seriously, i'm at a loss lol.....thank lucifer for the frothies, i'm off for some Zzzzs

I think on these smaller tighter grounds you're spot on. Need to bust a few packs with bigger bods up forward, crumb off them (bennell/Howe/Evans/Maric) and maintain the forward structure instead of every smaller bodied player leading out wide or bombing it on their heads from outside 50 where the spill and the ball is crumbed by the opposition and run easily out of our 50. Lack of any i50 pressure doesn't help matters though! Resting Jurrah is a definite must on these smaller grounds. Or alternatively he needs to be rotated off the bench and asked to play through the guts (and occasionaly push forward) as we did with him very late (too late!!...game was well and truly over). I would ask this of him more often regardless of the ground too. He's a big downhill skier at present and shows little interest in pressuring his opponent once he loses the ball in most cases. HUGE liability in this regard when he's off like tonight which is far too regular atm. And i'm not just talking liability physically pressure wise. As a team mate seeing this you'd have to be rocked and pretty [censored] that he's allowed to play like this most weeks and yet keeps getting a game week after week. And this is more a criticism of the FD rather than Jurrah. His lack of defensive improvement up forward is a blight on them to some degree as well. Also, listening to Davey tonight, looks like Wanna has gone on a permanent walkabout. He hasn't heard from him (nor has anyone in the Club apparently) for 2 weeks now

At least 2 pre-seasons away from being able to match it with any team on these small tight grounds (ie., Etihad, SCG & Launceston) IF we build the rookies from men into boys in the gym. Only time will tell. But it was also the intensity and manner in which we played the game. very reactive and most players were "watchers/waiters/sitters", instead of playing in front. We watched what our opponents where going to do. We waited and reacted to see what they would do, which was mostly attack. And we sat on them hoping to try and pressure them for turn overs. Instead they just got in front all night, took the initiative away from us and ran us off our legs. We've learned nothing from the North game and apparently taken a step backwards on this ground now. Almost as if we've talked ourselves into believing we can't win when we come here so lets just limit the severity of the loss, which unfortunately didn't work this evening. That's a worry as this is surely the coach's job to sell a believable story to the boys that they'll run with? Davey in an interview on MMM tonight said himself, "we're an MCG team, we seem to stand tall when we walk out on the ground there, and feel smaller at other grounds". This must be addressed going forward or we're in deep do do. Scully or no Scully. It's time to start blooding players who will never shirk a contest, run all day, offer 2nd / 3rd efforts (Sylvia..WTF was that!!!) and never give in (a la Wighty!!), in preference to those who appear to offer/show flashy periods of promise. For a start we have to bring Bartram in for Morton/Bennell/Strauss etc on these grounds. Bartram isn't the long term answer either but at least he has a red hot dip and can force a turnover to match his own turnovers lol. Tappy to me is an obvious other option. I can't think of too many others or know of many at Casey to offer any others at this point. Maybe Evans. Maybe we just don't have enough of these types at this stage.

Arghh. Too hard for tonite. I don't think people look at age on a field anyway. Number of games to me is the one that counts. I'd have to adjust every field in the spreadsheet to take out the word "year" and "month" lol. As well as round the months up and down to arrive at the averages. Can be done but i'll give it a miss this time High if you don't mind.

Confusing everyone including myself lol. Correct method when looking at past rounds for number of games played. Sorry, i'm looking at my own stats where i've used latest data for an upcoming round so i never have to do what you've done and look back at earlier rounds in most cases. However, don't do this for rounds you're looking at which have yet to be played. Example, when looking at the game against the dogs, just use the latest data from the previous round (in this case you would have looked at Rnd 14 stats, post match, against Richmond). If you subtract 22 games you're then taking it back a round to round 13 data which is relevant for Richmond round but not the Doggies. Hence the total number of games played vs the Doggies this round (inclusive of Rnd 14 but excluding Rnd 15) is 1,320 rather than your figure of 1,298 (ie., less 22 games). Hope this makes sense. At home having a few frothies watching the delayed telecast after an 8.15 finish at work....not lookin good.....

Apologies. You're initial Essendon theory stands. I had removed 227 games of Greeny's as well as Harvey's just to see where this placed the remainder of the players experience wise, as these two players kind of skew the numbers at the top end a little. I forgot to add them back when saving the spreadsheet. A slight oversight I wouldn't subtract 22 games however, as that will take you back 1 round. In other words you'll be subtracting 22 games incorrectly as the numbers supplied by footywire and your source match and are games played up to that current round (ie., games played post Round 7 in readiness for comparing them in their Round 8 match up). So the correct figures up to but not including Round 8 against North are as shown in the totals on your site. 1,320 Demons vs 1,779 North. Not that 22 games either way matters much lol. Cheers Nasher

Not quite. My records indicate a tad less experienced team in Round 8 vs North at Etihad. Demons 1,093 vs North 1,471 Round 11 against the Bombers was scary though. It was this round that we fielded a less experienced team than GCS. Demons 1,138 games vs GCS's 1,287

Western Bulldogs vs Melbourne Round 15, 2011 - Experience Stats Total games played by Team Bulldogs - 2,178 Demons – 1,274 Average games played per player Bulldogs - 99 Demons - 58 Average games played by category 0-49 Bulldogs - 14 / 8 (average games/number of players) Demons - 25 / 14 50-99 Bulldogs - 66 / 4 Demons - 64 / 2 100+ Bulldogs – 181 / 10 Demons - 132 / 6 This one's for you Wighty.....Demons by 27! Stats courtesy of footywire.com

Desperation and Courage personified. I can't recall him ever shirking a contest, even if he was likely to be wiped out! Damn quick in spurts and could run top speed all day. Played way taller than his appearance would suggest with an amazing leap from only one or two steps. One of my fondest memories is the 87 prelim (i think, not the only game that he did this), where the game was on the wire and he just kept going 3rd man up into the ruck contests from boundary throw ins, punching it 20 - 30 meters our way until it was out of danger and heading towards our forward line. I was reminiscing the other evening and watched a short highlights reel of the 87 Night Grand final where it all started. For those who may not have viewed it, watch for his 3rd man up clearance from a stoppage and then follow up into the forward line a few seconds later for the mark and goal. Also his rev up of the crowd post match on the ground with Swooper and all the boys celebrating...moving stuff..... R.I.P. Wighty and a big thank you for so many memorable moments and amazing efforts for our club. Condolences to his family, friends, the MFC and big Jimma. Mighty Demons Forever!

I've thought the same. However, he does show something special at times even in todays game, albeit only when he's well clear in most cases. He's a bit of a conundrum atm eh.