La Dee-vina Comedia

0.6% of what? If we "lead" that particular category then it can't mean 0.6% of all centre bounce infringements. It might be obvious to others, but I genuinely have no idea what this number means. Any ideas?

Do the stats back this up? That is, are Max's hitouts to advantage numbers higher than they were earlier in the year? It seemed to me in the last couple of weeks that our midfield was dining out on Max's work at a much higher rate than earlier in the year. I'm not sure what "hitouts to advantage" actually measures, but my eyes told me that our midfield has never had the consistent ability to take a tap and dispose of the ball properly as much as it has over the last two weeks.

Actually, I can understand where he's coming from. Our wins in the last few weeks have come from dominant team performances rather than from the efforts of a few individuals. On the other hand, the players he's selected from other teams showed out because their teams did not. It's the nature of what he's doing - he's looking at individuals. There's already another mechanism which measures teams - that's called the AFL Premiership Ladder.

I don't buy this argument. In 1986, being the last year of the "traditional" 12 team competition, the population of Australia was 16 million, meaning there were 1.3 million people per team. In 2018, the population of Australia is 24.7 million, meaning there are 1.3 million people per team. The talent pool should therefore be the same. Sure, there's competition from more sports and other non-sporting opportunities, but the average 17-18 year old who is drafted is far more professionally prepared than 17-18 year olds 30 years ago. I'm also not sure the standard of the game has dropped. It might be that all games are now shown which means we get to see the good and the bad, whereas back in the "good old days" we saw fewer and perhaps better games (because of the selectivity of which games to show.) It's also possible we just choose to remember selectively and remember the good games and not the bad ones.

There's a lot to like about what Paul Roos said but for an articulate person he really butchers the language! Lot's of half-sentences and incomplete thoughts. Nevertheless, you can work out what he means even if it doesn't have the linguistic elegance of a Winston Churchill. Or Hemingway.

I think Adelaide being "severely injury depleted" isn't quite right. They've got injuries and to some important players. But not that many. I think the media is overstating the impact injuries had on Adelaide and (with some exceptions) have been understating how poor Adelaide's team of uninjured players actually played.

Go on, admit it. You are. And there's nothing wrong with that.

Maybe we should change the word "demoted" in the thread title to "promoted".

Some ideas for the AFL to consider: start the Friday night games earlier so they don't finish so late regularise starting times (and days) instead of having them flip-flopping all over the place. Having a routine makes it easier for people to plan to watch (or attend) games. reward form when fixturing insist on at least four games per week being on free-to-air TV. There's no point in the AFL getting good money from a pay TV provider if it means people aren't watching the product I'm tempted to say "improve the on-field product" but (a) I'm not sure they know how to do that and (b) we're proving this year that exciting, watchable football is still possible without any need to change the rules. stop copying the NFL. As it happens, NFL ratings (in the US) have been dropping, too.

Can't work out is serious, cynical, satirical or sardonic. Daisy provides some insightful commentary from the boundary. Very few others, including Dipper, ever have. That may not be Dipper's fault. He may have done the job he was asked to do. if you need evidence as to how producers impact on the way presenters do their job, contrast Brian Taylor's serious Friday night calling with Bruce with his former role as caller and jokester on a Saturday night with Luke Darcy. Two completely different versions of BT.

Hogan has kicked 26 goals after 10 games. In 2014, our top goalkicker for the whole year kicked 20. Our next worst since the 1920s was 26 in 2008. Note - I haven't named the players in 2014 and 2008 because it's not about them. They were the beneficiaries (victims?) of playing in poor teams.

Two things come to mind. Firstly, I assume the team chooses to dispose the ball by hand or foot as quickly as possible to generate the fast ball movement. A player bouncing the ball is (usually) running with it, but essentially no faster than the opposition players flooding back at the same time, so bouncing the ball helps by giving the opposition time to block space. Secondly, I assume it's a team rule to dispose the ball if at all possible, rather than running with it. I could imagine a possible exception is the player who's kick will be the shot at goal.

6. Brayshaw 5. Hogan 4. Neal-Bullen 3. Jones 2. Viney 1. Oliver Lever, Lewis, Salem, Jetta and Hibberd are all unlucky, primarily because the midfield did such a good job, the ball didn't come their way often enough. When it did, they repelled very well. And Gawn is unlucky because I'm only allowed to give votes to six players.

Wow. By eliminating use of the upper case and now whole words, you've really minimised the amount of effort you need to produce your posts.

Is it possible the State Government always expected to "take a bath" with it? Wasn't the idea to build the Stadium as an anchor tenant to encourage development around it?

Ignoring for a moment the supply and demand issue which impacts on earnings, don't forget your CE, depending on age when reaching that job, could work at it for many years. With very few exceptions, a professional footballer's career will be over in their early 30s. And once they're retired, many will have a lifetime of aches and pains as a result.

Daisy, did it take you long to work out how to use upper case on your device?

"...an immersive and interactive experience for all...". Sounds like what farmers do to sheep when they drench and neuter them.

Indeed. I fully expect that part of any major sponsorship package is access to the membership database. Whether it's email addresses or residential addresses, sponsors would see great value in direct marketing to members.

The AFL was full of footballers called "Luke" about 18-20 years after the release of the original Star Wars movie (Luke Darcy, Luke Power, etc). We've now gone from players named after Disney characters to a whole stadium.

Just hope the caller wasn't referring to Max and Mitch King.

You can't say that. It's sacrilegious. Everyone knows it was the Norm Smith Curse.

Seriously? Like he had a choice of movie studios or franchises to choose from? How, exactly, do you think these deals get done?

I like the way you've covered up the real reason for crying into their porridge by claiming it's a dental issue when everyone knows the real reason is their incarceration in prison.

And Andrew Demetriou