Dockett 32

FOS looks a beauty.

Appart from being massive unders, would surely test their salary cap.

So it’s suggested that the net effect is we pay 700/800k pa for seven years to deal with a current problem child? Bloody hell! How does that help us again? I realise that we are wedged, but those who created the problem need to own it and fix the problem child. Getting walked over as proposed , the old quick and easy cut and run , simply makes things worse for a very long time.

Negotiation for Nibbler should be the same as others. It should be fair and a win/win for both parties. Consensus seems to be the 2nd rounder that we gave them ,as it sounds reasonable. (Perhaps even generous on our part as events have turned out) Anything worse would represent a poor result for us and a win for Adelaide. Adelaide would be seen as shabby in such an event , they could miss a good player/ person ,an easy deal becomes difficult, gets held up etc etc. l’m sure Adelaide get that.

Nothing to see here.

It seems anything is possible in the ‘lawless AFL’😀

Fair point. Either way, across the AFL spectrum , contractual integrity is a joke and it’s high time the AFL fixed it.

Don’t think so. We still have May Lever, Viney, Gawn , Salem, Petty, Langdon, McVee, Rivers, Bowey,McDonald and others to bring 10 draft picks along for the ride. Wouldn’t take too long to get them up to speed.

My concern is the ability of players and player managers to make commercial contracts voidable at their option. Seems to me that some sort of mystery ‘bias’ has been afforded the player side of the transaction. l think it’s time the AFL either made it clear that they expect contractional arrangements to be observed. Maybe another alternative is that if player generated attempted contact termination really means the eventual landing place rests with the players current home club. That would even things up a bit. AFL contracts currently appear to be not worth the paper they are written on. Not a good look for AFL.

Take your point , but what do we mere supporters know about any negotiations. In 8 years ( even longer) we’ve been fed quite a number of apparent solutions to a city linked training ground and social club.

You saw the game he played yesterday and know what he’s capable of ,not to mention multiple b&f’s , premiership player, astonishing leader. etc etc Not worth a first round pick you say? lt was your first post , but l beg to differ. Reckon he’s attached at the hip with Max and the boys and would like to go out that way.

I think we may be learning what having a dicey ‘back up’ list can really mean.

Point made was fair enough. Stewart very unlucky not to get a free kick and he too, could have been seriously injured. Be nice to see Chol take the front position.

You are not alone. Thought Rivers tackle was basically around the waist. Rozee is a cunning customer. Along with the natural momentum felt he added to the result and eventual free kick awarded to him. Think Tommy Mac said a few words to him.

Hate to see a list like that shortly before the season starts. Suggests we are behind the eight ball before the commencement of proceedings after a five month layoff. TBC is such a crumby term. How about some indication for supporters when these boys will or are likely to be available for selection.