Jump to content

monoccular

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by monoccular

  1. Do we really know if Fullerton is a ruck forward or a forward ruck? They wouldn’t even open the mail. So far up themselves the arrogant bastards at AFL HQ
  2. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Ross Lyon - how long since he ran out on Freo? Hangover still? 4. Or is he on the AFL darling list?
  3. monoccular replied to tiers's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    First word sums it up. IF the AFL were serious about violence and assault, which this was. IF they could do it in a way that gave them enough wriggle room for their anointed darlings to get off when needed they may consider it, but if they can't, they won't. Point one - pretty unlikely in my view especially for the types of incidents discussed here Point two - the best summation yet, but again, what if Pendelberry or Cripps did this on finals eve?
  4. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Somewhere I recall there have been suggestions that the MRO and tribunal are corrupt incompetent institutions. There has certainly nothin happen this week to suggest otherwise.
  5. Yes probably US cultural imperialism, but stolen from Yiddish long before the existence of the nation Israel. And yes - Clarry is a beaut bloke, quite bonza.
  6. BBP - you will be getting the "shocking injury management MFCCS" posters out of the woodwork. I never recall any fractured clavicle being ready for the rigors of top grade footy in under 6-8 weeks. Correct me if I am wrong.
  7. monoccular replied to tiers's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Are you really surprised?? I am not. This goes on all the time and is just ignored.
  8. monoccular replied to tiers's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Houdini escaped more times than Charlie Cameron and Patrick Cripps have at the tribunal. And he died of a ruptured appendix which was not all that uncommon in the 1920s.
  9. monoccular replied to tiers's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Of course it is a dog act - but tolerated by the hypocritical afl and the incompetent MRO. Clarrie cops these most weeks. ANY strike should start at one week( if they are in any way serious about stamping out unnecessary and unsightly violence which clearly they re not) - yes, even for Collingwood and Carlton players in finals. But of course even if Christian did look at it (though wasn't instructed to do so by Ch 7) he would grade low impact, in play (because it was at the ground) and maybe even accidental.
  10. Much as I detest the increase of gambling advertising in our game, your point is interesting to say the least. Most gamblers, I believe, bet with their heads not their hearts, and aren’t likely to often throw money after sentiment.without likelihood of return. Any gamblers here please correct me if this is too simplistic.
  11. Has anyone ever seen so many turnovers? Kicks DIRECT to opposition players. Eyesight? Jumper clash? (didn’t happen way back when covered in mud). Execution WILL kill us today and for the season.
  12. And prepare yourselves for AFL byes, yes more of them, courtesy of some [censored] named Gil for introducing a 19th team and not replicating a team that already has Tasmanian connections. The farcical scheduling will become even more inequitable.
  13. No fault on Woey's part but he was NOT anywhere near an adequate replacement for the injured Salem. Maybe Turner will play a role on HBF??
  14. Thanks kev for your usual insightful analysis From those who trained who would be HBF for Salem? I am not sure I like the suggestions from some of moving Duke or Langdon there - have they been there before? Woey though no fault of his own was not up to scratch as his in game replacement. Maybe Disco?
  15. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I may be wrong but I seem to have heard somewhere that heading the ball is not allowed in some junior soccer competitions - not sure how young though
  16. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Maybe the Carlton guy could also be cited for overreacting ... well after impact
  17. ... or premature, which could explain any extended absence ?
  18. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    or maybe a 15 yo girl waiting to be 16 Taytay lookalike?
  19. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Kozzie got two (or was it three) round 1 2023 for a zero impact impact.
  20. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    and throw in the WESTERN Bulldogs too 🙂
  21. It is just impossible to develop up and coming players properly when there is no continuity. Casey have had two byes in 3 weeks. A pathetic excuse for a development competition.
  22. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Of course just lIke Brayshaw failing in his duty to avoid #4💩 I recall that we were the beneficiaries of one last week or the week before (Petty). MFCSS And missed out on Duke and Kolt? I guess time will tell. Port and Bears - never put your house on them. 🤔
  23. Sadly I believe given the reasons for him not playing he cannot be out on a LTI list. It is however taking a hellova long time. What has happened to “justice delayed, justice denied”?
  24. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    This is a real opportunity to fool the public into believing that the MRO and tribunal are NOT corrupt outcome driven team biased (dis)organizations. Will they baulk? Kozzie would get 4-6 for that without a doubt. Its not as if Toby gets the “ never been suspended despite multiple fines” Cameron discount, though he will probably get the GW$ needs a flag discount
  25. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    But we really need to further dilute the talent pool with another team (which will also further compromise the competition with another bye) I think the 95% probably don’t give the AFL as much as the 5% - money $$$$$