Jump to content

monoccular

Members
  • Posts

    17,165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by monoccular

  1. Kozzie in the back (not the dive called on 1116)
  2. Bowie continuing his reliable rise
  3. Gone to sleep again Dees.
  4. Seedsman was allowed to do that last time. Don't we learn?
  5. Would have to be Smith ATM despite what he has done
  6. Sadly only on the fake crowd speakers 😠 I have managed to sync 1116 SEN so turned TV sound off
  7. Needs to pull his finger out - would be the logical out for TMc . Already behind VDB medical sub in DT points -3.
  8. Jackson is such a smart footballer - that kick to BBB was so imaginative.
  9. BBB - score review. What was the call? Cant see evidence of touch. P1ssweak technology AFL. Just do something about it Gil you prancing polo pony
  10. Dropping the ball in that Brown tackle
  11. Couple of good things Smith. Looking as flat as last time
  12. Deja vu all over again.
  13. If one really thinks more about it in an evolutionary way, maggots metamorphosise into blowflies, which have compound eyes, so possibly not quite so far fetched as first appears. On the Hawkins issue, I can’t remember which case but the MRO and or tribunals have very clearly said, if you pin the arms and the head hits the ground you are guilty. I guess they will do a Donut Dan on this one - “don’t remember”
  14. Inside or outside?
  15. The MRO is not a lottery, which is an exercise in random numbers. The MRO has very predictable numbers and were it sold as a lottery would quickly go broke.
  16. He may love the outcome but only if he is told to. So predictable that a Geelong star will be freed. Dangerfield was, as has a recently used term, a footy action, whereas Hawkins was undue force. Certainly far far worse than Viney.
  17. Some like it, some love it, but I cannot see the sense as it so much (more even than usual) depends on umpires interpretation and diligence, and the penalty can be absurd. Hate to say it but looks innocent (that said, ANB would get 3-4) Any footage of the Hawkins one?
  18. Both will get off under the “Innocent Cat veteran” rule.
  19. Don’t we all know that?
  20. Hasn’t been told yet whether to look at it or not.
  21. I don’t recall that there are degrees of tenuousness. Most importantly, did ch 7 make a judgement? If not Christian won’t even look at it.
  22. Trealor seems to have learned the art of the Bulldog throw.
  23. Only watched Q4 - is it too much a mixed metaphor to say frost seems on fire?
×
×
  • Create New...