Jump to content

Chook in Perth

Members
  • Posts

    422
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Chook in Perth

  1. I don't have any new information, and no idea what Dangerfield will do. But everything I was told, and posted, has gone public in the last 24 hours. Suit yourself, but I'm taking refuge in the confirmation of interest and offers. Gotta be in it to win it.
  2. apparently big Mitch couldn't control little Mitch in his last days at AAMI Park.....
  3. Sorry brother, my info has dried up in last few days. Nothing new to report.
  4. wipe your plucking chin, Fence, you're dribbling.
  5. Dangerfield met with Jones, Vince and Goodwin on Friday.
  6. Overs and unders have to be assessed at the end of the trade period, not one deal in isolation. What did you start with, and what did you end with... I'll trust Roos, Viney, Taylor and Mahoney to deliver us a much improved position.
  7. Freo 7 years at $600k, Sydney 6 years at eff knows what..... Its a fait accompli.
  8. sorry should have been clearer. what what I can gather we did go to him with a Godfather offer sometime ago, and were told to get the ducks in a row for next year. everything changed last week. who knows how this plays out. Only logical Connors leaks to industry so another, more attractive, club moves heaven and earth. get this superfluous on field distraction out of the way first I suppose
  9. Sorry guys was hoping for more detail. not forthcoming. However what I did get was two other sources tell me essentially the same thing: Danger and Connors told us to sort ourselves for FA nxt year. after the events of last week, he's open to moving now. we have the picks to satisfy the Crows, and an open cheque book. Forum veterans will recall Grand Final week 2007. here we go again
  10. Hold that thought. Hearing Dangerfield is now very much in play, with likelihood somewhere near 90%. More info tomorrow.
  11. Suit yourself. Wasn't offering an opinion. I was offering what I've been told.
  12. Not happening guys. it was either Dangerfield or Sanderson. Rumours about Melbourne were deliberately leaked to ensure the threat was taken seriously. From what I have been told Danger will now stay, and probably recommit. To be honest I don't want blokes who can weild that sort of power anyway.
  13. Goodwin will be announced very soon. Possibly this week. In keeping with our long and storied history of problem gamblers.
  14. As a semi retired poster, I sure as hell aren't coming here for the drivel that fills every thread. Would go as far to say in 80 pages his posts are the only ones worth reading.
  15. The scenario about him playing football again. There's been a lot of rumour and innuendo as to why he retired, all of which is none of our business. Remains to be seen whether he can physically and mentally cope. But he's training hard and wants to play. That in itself is a significant step forward.
  16. This scenario is very much in play, feet and head permitting.
  17. Those of you who use Twitter regularly may be familar with a guy who tweets as @jmac. Funny guy (horrible communist though). John runs a web development business and has professional knowledge of graphic and web design, fonts etc..Basically what looks good. Long and the short of it - his professional view is the Melbourne Football Club is bloody terrible at merchandising and could do so much better. Here follows an (approved for posting by John) email he sent the club last night. Would be good to get feedback from posters on this issue. I get the sense a groundswell may get some improvement here as the club tries to swim away from the turd waters of the Schwab era. Hi all! I've been giving you a fair bit of stick on Twitter recently about MFC merchandise (my handle is, ahem, @jmac). I mostly try and keep it light-hearted/civil, but every now and then I get a bit... ranty. And sweary. At the suggestion of the inimitable @demonblog, I decided to gather my thoughts and words from the gutter and try and give some more constructive criticism. If you're still reading at this point, thanks for indulging me. You see—and I'm sure everyone who writes to you to complain says this—I love the Melbourne Football Club. I haven't been a member for as long as some, but I've followed the club since I was born. My Dad barracks for the Dees, and so do my two brothers and sister. My son Angus does now too, and with any luck so will his sister, Zara. Angus has been a member since he was born, and I'm hoping to sign 6 month-old Zara up this year too. My Dad is lucky enough to have seen the club win a Grand Final back in the day – in fact, had we not won the '64 GF, I might've been a Collingwood supporter like my grandfather and mother. Dodged a bullet there. Anyway, the point of the email is this: in my opinion, Demons merchandise is terrible. Incredibly, shamefully, cringe-worthily bad. It's not just a bit average, or so-bad-it's-good, or even boring. I could deal with any of those; most merchandise is not great. But ours is quantifiably abysmal. I'm not sure who is to blame -- I certainly hope I'm not bad-mouthing some dedicated and dutiful volunteer. But if you are paying someone to concept and design this stuff, you need to stop and find someone else, fast. Take this beanie. I understand the intent: you want to make a beanie that looks like the ones we used to wear back in the day. But instead of making a faithful replica, this design says "vintage" on it. VINTAGE. That's kind of like getting and elderly person and writing "OLD" on their forehead in permanent marker. Like the pompom and chunky knit didn't give that away already? And what is with that font? Completely inappropriate. None of it makes any sense, and so it is awful. Wouldn't wear it if you were giving them away, sorry. How would I make it better? Lose all text, emphasise the demon illustration on the patch, and done. Simple. Was bad, is now acceptable. What about this watch. Apart from looking terrible on the website (the image is stretched almost beyond recognition) — really? *That* logo on a cheap-looking Citizen knockoff? Apart from not having any info on what it is you're selling on that page, this is just a terrible idea. Again, I understand the intent: you want to sell something at low cost with high markup. Solid plan, can't fault it. But this looks like something you'd find in a plastic egg in one of those $2 toy dispensers. And you don't do anything to make it seem anything better than that by stretching the image and giving no context. I could name another dozen instances of extreme ugliness on the shop, but I'll leave it there. At a higher level, there's this damned logo. Please, please drop it. Kill it with fire. Cut your losses. It's a kitchen sink, a designed-in-a-boardroom nightmare of a thing. It looks bad everywhere. The lettering is terrible. The entire idea behind it stinks. Whoever assembled it is a saint for attempting to thoughtfully cram 8,000 elements of face-palming obviousness into a single design, but that doesn't make it work. We are lucky to have a generally high standard of graphic design (and graphic designers) here in Melbourne -- you should engage with that community to come up with something better, something timeless, as our heritage demands. Christ, as *we* demand. Just use the MFC insignia for now and start looking for designers to come up with something that can help us supporters get behind the club while we rebuild, rather than be reminded of the horrors of the immediately pre-Roos era. I wouldn't want a professional sporting team to look like some backwater amateur club. We should demand higher standards in how we present our team. Look to Manchester United or Arsenal, or any American sporting team (pro or amateur) for inspiration on this. There's a reason we 30-something-year-old dorks keep buying team merch from overseas -- it's good-looking stuff. It's aspirational, it's generally high quality, and it's well designed. I want to support the Demons in every way I can, and I'd actually buy and wear Melbourne stuff if it was anything close to acceptable. And how's this: Freo are doing a better job of their merch than we are. FREMANTLE. Their technicolour yawn of a brand is producing better gear than our steeped-in-history blue-blooded traditionalist team. What a travesty. The club is clearly rejuvenated with the arrival of dual patron saints Peter Jackson and Paul Roosy Roos. We're all very excited about this, after aeons of profound heartbreak. But despite potential improvements in the football department, you shouldn't allow the rot to sit in any areas of business. There's no accounting for taste, sure, and I'm certain you've sold enough of this garbage that whoever is designing it can at least justify their employment (I hope). But don't you want MFC to be better than that? No one wants to barrack for Melbourne when supporters look like shopping centre bargain-bin dregs. We need people to be envious of us, to want what we have, in order to draw more people to us. Actually, here's something positive (how refreshing, John) -- the new training tops with the large MFC insignia are fantastic. A real step in the right direction. I'll even forgive the AHG logo overlapping the insignia. I obviously feel really strongly about this, and if you'd ever like to chat about it (haha!) feel free to get in touch. I'm a graphic/web designer and have been working with all sorts of Melbourne-based institutions for a long time, which is part of why I feel this passionate. I want to be proud of and excited by the Demons again; I want to not expect disappointment and mediocrity by default. And I want to wear a good hat/tshirt/scarf/anything to games. Please! Thanks for your time! Cheers, John McLennan
  18. I asked a journo, who'd know, about this kid. "Will he make it?" "Dead certainty. Quick off 20, lovely left foot." That'll do me
  19. Hawthorn are sponsored by an ASX 200 company. I can say, as an employee of said company, that's not a wow factor for footy clubs.
  20. This deal is significantly more than Webjet and Opel. With the NT deal, we are above mid table in sponsorship revenue. A remarkable achievement coming off 2 (7?) years of disaster.
  21. You were always a fan. Thought him better than Bennell from day one. I suppose two wrongs make you right.
×
×
  • Create New...