old dee

I have no doubt we will get way more out of Hibbo and Melk that picks 73 and 78.

I suggest zero RM. If that is not the case for Gods sake tell us what is happening President.

15 for a skinny kid in his first year. JVR looked way more developed in the body at this time last year.

37 probably has a chance but after that it is like picking with a pin which is probably why we wont use our last two picks.

Ok, as for coming on this thread every year it intrigues me.

I am always amazed by these threads on player numbers. It is a subject I have little if any interest in. As long as the player plays well I don't care if the player he wears is 1 or 99. Can someone explain the interest in what number a player wears?

A funny thing judging height in metric. As an old impérial person I am ok with all things metric except people's height. 195 means little to me however 6'5 gives me an exact idea of his height.

Probably spend their days at Casey!

I think we get to choice some players tonight who will probably spend their days at Casey.

NC we have been holding onto that idea for the last 6 years and what do we have at this point? As the song goes wishing and hoping!

BDA the actual position doesn't matter it is the perception, the average person see the MFC as a bunch of silver tails

Over the last 6-7 years the FD has had way more hits than misses in player selection. We have a glaring need for KPF’s and it would appear we have taken the best one available at pick 14 so I will give them my support for the selection. However he looks skinny which I hope changes over the next couple of years, watching him develop will be a good reason for following Casey over the next couple of years.

I have made that comment before but when the captain of your GF winning team makes a comment about the lack of facilities I have changed my mind. Just stop with this near the G idea, It is the desired position by our older members and a board who has welded themselves to the idea. Have the members ever been asked their opinion? Of course the answer is no. As I said two days ago we now have a labor government for the next four years who see no votes in the MFC and in fact a loss of votes if they allocate green space in inner Melbourne to a conservative football club. If we want something to start this decade we have to change this near the G requirement. It is like a giant anchor that stops any other idea or thought. Near the G or bust will see us bust.

Doesn't even sound like square one to me.

Well we can be confident he won’t want to go home to mum!

I got an email from the club 2 hours ago with merch.

No chance beyond that Ds.

No I didn't watch NC and by the look of the score line it is just as well. I was entertaining my Grand daughters who stayed last night. PS neither are interested in A rules. Oldest is a basketball fanatic.

Was there a game today NC? I didn't think the season started till March. Oh you mean the girls thing.

It's a joke DP.

Sadly there is nothing to discuss Mr. Leg.

IMO that would be negated by people not wanting to lose green space. The MFC lost out when we turned down Olympic Park. Trying to get something now is extremely difficult if not impossible.

Sadly true DD

.No another no footy Sunday!

Just checked junior members don't get a scarf.