DeeSpencer

Going to be a genuine toss up between Smith’s 2 year deal and Brayshaw’s 6 year deal for which one is worse

Baker and Dunstan just showed you all why they’re in the VFL.

Happy for the initial contact not paid, but the second guy who jumped on Toby’s head has to be paid

McDonald and JVR both bossing a VFL kid for sure but that’s good alternating of useful talls in the ruck contests

In September next year ‘24 will be the draft, then in September ‘24 everyone will want ‘25. It’s always the way.

And if he had May or Rance’s speed and power he’d be great. Or if he plays as the third tall like Stewart and gets 20 touches a game and kicks it unbelievably well. Petty’s height and reach makes him the perfect complement to May and allows Harry to take genuine pack intercept marks. Turner’s a good prospect. I expect him to play a lot of AFL footy. But if we want an elite backline we need him as the 2nd or 3rd tall. And he’s your friend, cousin, significant other or all or the above. But he’s on the shorter side for key defenders

Haha a classic Tom McDonald crap fend and turnover. He’s been so overrated in his absence

Nah, he can’t run. Sparrow’s our best running mid and a capable defensive forward. A couple of good kicks from Dunstan at the VFL level doesn’t mean he’s suddenly a good user

Similar to the home and away game the Casey VFL mids are getting smashed at the contest and on the spread. Backline is zoning way too much too, need to press up

Could’ve played a 2m tall bath tub at chf and got similar results to Tomlinson. Surprised we didn’t try that

Retire: M Brown, Daw Delist: Baker, Rosman (train on) Trade: Jackson, Bedford That’s 6 list spots. Plus Hunt is every chance to find a home elsewhere if he isn’t signed yet. Wait and see: Hibbo, Melk Seek to move on Weid and Tomlinson but good luck finding homes for them.

Not likely. Possible, but unlikely. Turner’s on the shorter side and Tomlinson can’t move, both have physical impairments to being as good as Petty has been.

He’s mostly dropped because 4 talls just won’t work in the forward line so Weid has to ruck to open the forward line up. I think there’s probably better state league options but the way he was developing suggests to me he’ll be a good VFL ruck in a year or 2. The difference between good VFL rucks and half the back up rucks on afl lists is just good luck so it wouldn’t shock me

That’s just about the opposite of ‘big news’ but Port and Adelaide sure aren’t operating like he’s available any time soon. Kos has family in Perth and Adelaide right? West Coast might be the one to watch next year if they lose Rioli. So far I’m not seeing anything more than the usual interstate player trade speculation.

Crows going after Rankine and Port going for Jnr Burger suggests otherwise. Port’s the club that makes the most sense and apart from saving Hinkley’s job you’d think you’d prioritise Pickett over Rioli

Wasted year is harsh. Back to back is bloody tough for any club yet alone a small club not used to success with a short preseason, nomadic training ground and unreliable fan base. Hawks 09, Dogs 17, even the Cats super team never did it. The teams who have done it, Hawks 14/15 honestly didn’t beat much and were just a mile clear on talent, and Richmond 2020 with a 17 game season of 17 minute quarters. Our season took a massive hit when Salem and Lever both weren’t themselves. That’s 2 elite players that make our backline elite. Then our next path to success is rucks and Max wasn’t himself and LJ had the go home stuff. Our final path to success is the midfield and Tracc cops a broken leg and Oliver’s season sure wasn’t helped by his thumb exploding.

That gets said every year, and honestly I think it’s only been right once in the last 20 years which was the ‘18 draft.

When we did the Weideman and Pickett deals we bet on ourselves winning our way from lowly ladder positions to mid table to justify those deals. Now we’re at the top we have to win a lot just to break even. We more than did that with Bowey/Laurie. Unfortunately the groundhog is stuck in second gear but value wise that was worth it. This year we’ve now ended up sending our first pick to Sydney via Adelaide for JVR. Pick 19 in for a pick that probably ends up at 14 or 15. Not a huge deal, and easy to say it’s worth it for a much needed key forward with a year of development. 4 pick slide is a pretty good interest rate in this economy. But without the 10 game win streak to start the year we might’ve finished outside or barely in the 8. And giving away a pick around 10 for pick 19 would’ve been nasty. Most years a gem falls around the 10 mark. You don’t want to be giving up a pick on the edges of the top 10 that gets to pick right after all the bad teams pick, to then pick after all the good clubs have had a go in the late teens.

I’d love to see a Petty, JVR and T Mc forward line. Rotate all of them through the ruck as needed. But my guess is Petty is still seen as a vital defender and the future post May as well. Struggling to see Turner (has upside), Tomlinson or Joel Smith being trusted as the 2nd tall defender. Could Petty be a swing man for McDonald or JVR? I think it’s entirely reasonable. Start with a defensive game plan, as the game opens up throw Petty forward to capitalise. Maybe even a trump card that we use at unexpected moments.

The best thing that happened to Brown last year was missing a huge chunk of the start of the year. He might have more in him if he gets the same treatment next year. He really shouldn’t play more than 12 home and away games.

You’d fire 15 coaches a year. Are you on the Essendon board?

Nonsense. They’re both the best coaches their clubs have had in 50 years. Bevo gets criticised for selection lotto and a wide open skills based game plan Goodwin for conservative selection and a down the line game plan There’s a Bulldogs forum version of you wanting Bevo to do exactly what Goodwin does

I agree with that. I think our list is very good without being great, and the coaches crafted a premiership winning game plan based upon an elite defensive system and an offensive system based around powerful mids blasting it quickly to tall forwards. With a short preseason they didn’t change much, and we’ve come up only a few key moments of discipline and skill execution short of hosting a home prelim. We need to strengthen and balance out the list with midfield runners and some fresh flanker talent, plus solve the talls. Our midfield and half back depth is really poor for a good side (Bowey, JJ, daylight) and our half forward depth is super uninspiring. Are there game plan things we can try in the short term - yes. But we’ve done them in first halves v top 4 sides in Sydney and Collingwood in the last month or so and done them pretty well. We were hitting Fritsch up beautifully last week. Ask any neutrals about the standard of footy in Melb Syd or Melb Coll and they’ll both say it was high level stuff. Most of the selection talk involves taking away key players in the defensive game plan and replacing them with Casey players in the hope that produces a 4 quarter effort. That I don’t agree with.

I reckon he’s hit 40-50% in some late season games and hasn’t been a big scoreboard factor. Not that scores are the only metric of a forwards worth. If we plan to spread the ball out more and move it faster (and we aren’t winning jack if we don’t) we need more than just bomb it to Max down the line out of him as a forward. Obviously the days of Fev on the lead are over but even Mason Cox on his good days knows how to lead in to spots in the zone. Or someone like Tom Lynch is a big contested marker who gets out the back of zones. A good amount of forward time - as he’s played the last 2 years - is good for Max and the team. I just think he’s a ruck/forward and not a forward/ruck

Your sneaky little (of many) doing a lot of work there. Goodwin’s probably not a super coach, but it’s hardly a super list either. In particular, trying to solve a scoring/key forward problem without the personnel to do so is always going to take some failed experiments.