beelzebub

I think the tenet of what many here are thinking is that Milkshakeman is just another so-so player. I keep hearing that the FD wants to better the list. I dont see getting this bloke as accomplishing that. We have enough so-so bland nqrs. Id like to think the club has higher aspiarations. Still is all moot..he's Essendon

ditto

Id rather get Relton !!

they must have short memories OD...got mine too

sorry mate you don't get it. This is nothing about the afl now . Never was

yeah Id agree with that...smoke and mirrors hopefully hiding behind curtain #3 is another Vanders and waiting behind the 'secret' door is some 'defector' keeping 'sehr schtum' all to be revealed when and where....one hopes

if that were as you suggest then WADA wouldnt be bothering with an appeal. I suggest they (WADA) have NOT their pound of flesh. Who's been banned/suspended yet ? WADA dont deal in slaps on wrist...thats the AF"s preserve. That 'message" won't resonate until they can say..."see that lot sitting over there( not playing ) ?...thats your lot to anyone crossing the line " This isnt "vengeance"...this is due punishment...make no mistake

why...WADA issue "Holidays" to athletes

where in your appreciation of this do you account for the idea he probably wont be playing for ANYONE in 2016 ?

no love for Vanders ?

wada says hello

Which bit of looming WADA penalties does no one wish to acknowledge? All 34 are persona non grata. Its actually irrelevant whether the Milkshakeman is good, bad, soft or otherwise. Hes going a a summer holiday soon...a rather long one. Only an idiot would give this idea oxygen. I thought we'd gotten rid our idiots

They're just repeating earlier article

not half as much as the club !!

was Shaw on the same "supplements "Just curious

Probably be 26 before he gets to hit the paddock again

and here's hoping the winds change direction dramatically !!

So....WADA we think about this Melksham idea ...

i agree. Beggars belief wed be this stupid. Hopefully just another fluffy piece of imaginative writing ( cant call it journalism )

Think im going to be sick

Melksham has a very dark cloud hovering above him. A deluge of Biblical proportion will descend in a short while. Why anyone even contemplates him, or ANY of the '34' is beyond reason or sense.

Hes a condemned man...why is there even a discussion. Hes going on holidays shortly. Essendon and their guilty tribe can fester in their demise. only an idiot would deal with Ess. Can't understand for life of me why anyone has. Very poor investment.

I think someones a bit touchie.... screams someone biting off more than they could chew. fair enough your rules.. seems soft imho ignore buttons have their use Id have thought

He is one of the 34 i take it

really.....for a pm ?? hardly seems right . Whole point of pm's surely is to take 'discussion' to a private venue Thats disappointing