Jump to content

daisycutter

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by daisycutter

  1. i thought it was only most improved for melbourne
  2. i'm liking it, anb, avb, jkh, tmac, omac - a team of acronyms avb is one of my favourites, dof. if he's selected i hope he's up to it
  3. anb + avb, fms
  4. daisycutter replied to olisik's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    daryl baldock would be laughing in his grave
  5. buggy would be a better player if he just changed his haircut
  6. saints and carlton certainly scotching the theory that wins equates to increased memberships
  7. out 1, maybe 2, possibly 3, probably 4, definitely season.
  8. pickled in a jar? that can be organised but it would be his preference not yours ?
  9. daisycutter replied to kieranbj's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    i'll go 28k. can't see 30+k
  10. daisycutter replied to kieranbj's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    at least it's not the 4:35 start time
  11. if hogan is not 100% i'd rest him. we need him firing on all cylinders for the last 3 games and (hopefully) finals no need to risk him on an easy game if he has any niggles if so, replacement out of pedo, weids or bull smith
  12. no. just tackled after ball is kicked is just fine for the rule agreed may is different because this was a handball situation and wasn't a tackle. it was a bump and it was high you also can't tackle a player after a handball, but you can block or bump within 5m any player whether he has just disposed of it or not. the exception being if the player is attempting to mark the ball
  13. we picked up (somehow) another 131 after the supposed close of memberships last year, so with today (and there being 3 home games to go) and the after-flow we might scrape to 44,400. my 44,444 prediction might still have a chance - lol
  14. i don't think you can determine it by metres or milliseconds, that is just too crazy how is the tackler able to judge whether the ball being kicked has travelled 5m in a few milliseconds so it is ok to tackle. plainly he can't, nor can an umpire it needs to be kept simple. late is late, and i think this is what umpires judge it on. there is then (sometimes) a little bit of common sense, if the tackle is a split second late and the impact is inconsequential the umpire could ignore it like they can with many other marginal free kick situations the overriding rule though is you can't tackle a player after he has kicked the ball
  15. daisycutter replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    did we win? i haven't been brave enough to look at a paper or the news till today. phew
  16. i have never heard an umpire say a tackle after a kick was a free because the ball was > 5m away. They always say late tackle. i.e. a tackle after the ball was kicked. now it may be true that in a split second the ball has travelled 5m but no-one uses 5m as a yardstick because it is impossible for an umpire to measure with the speed of a ball immediately off the foot you might get away with a split second late tackle depending on force of tackle but there is certainly no guarantee. very hard for an umpire to determine a 'split second late'.
  17. you can't tackle/bump a player after he has kicked the ball. it must be only while he is in the motion of kicking. you could probably give a bit of leniency for being a split second late but any more time and it is a free up the ground are you saying i can tackle/bump a player after he has kicked it as long as the ball is within 5m? how could you possibly measure 5m when it is a normal kick immediately after contact with foot? it has always been judged on time after disposal. late is late.
  18. no you are not. he made up th 5 m rule, it doesn't exist for someone who has just kicked the ball hit someone late after disposing of the ball is a free kick every day, and based on lateness, not 5m now whether it is reportable is a different matter but got nothing to do with a mythical 5m
  19. was definitely a soft free and costly (for cows) but technically correct i wouldn't have paid it, because the cows player did not jump prematurely but at the correct normal time and just missed the ball. a "reasonable" attempt i thought. the contact was also minimal p.s. i wouldn't have paid the free against fritsch for the deliberate oob either
  20. if you look at omac's draft year highlights you will see him kicking some nice long distance goals. i think he was a fwd in those days and had a nice kick
  21. never mind dazzle, you can watch the replay sober
  22. daisycutter replied to gOLLy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    John Sylvester's take on the state of footy. agree with most of it A dozen ways to save footy
  23. swannies running the clock down nicely not memories
  24. daisycutter replied to John Crow Batty's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    really? no thanks!