Jump to content

daisycutter

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by daisycutter

  1. keep working on it ?
  2. the only development needed at punt road oval begins with b and ends with ozer
  3. nah ds, it's one of those things that only work one way not everything has to be scientifically logical why else would we all be here spreading our passion on 'land when nothing much is coming the other way
  4. daisycutter replied to Elegt's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    it is only 16 days since tradeweek finished afl really have screwed up here call it all off, treloar back to filth dodoro nominated for sainthood
  5. daisycutter replied to Elegt's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    wasn't friday (yesterday) the afl deadline for resolution?
  6. just remember where you were and what you were doing at the time a highlight story for the grandchildren
  7. this thread just got all scrambled up
  8. doesn't mean we have to like it, wwsw ☹️
  9. daisycutter replied to Elegt's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    treloar back to filth filth blow salary cap fined $400,00 fined 12 premiership points miss finals by %
  10. daisycutter replied to Elegt's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    may the filth's travails last for ever i hope bucks and eddie never resign
  11. daisycutter replied to Elegt's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    pies make dodoro look like a choir boy
  12. waiting for a "should we go after beams" post
  13. doesn't have to be tiggy touch wood, just allow 3 seconds when prior opportunity. was essentially this years ago.
  14. daisycutter replied to Demon3564's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    ffs, are we going to keep up this mfcss petracca hysteria running for another 2 years?
  15. understand where you are coming from but i think you are being too pessimistic saying "incentivising attack isn't enough. And measures to try to reduce congestion aren't enough". I think they can work but not straight away and the current changes for 2021 aren't enough but they are a start and importantly an admission by the afl of the problem. and remember it's not necessary to eliminate congestion , just minimise it enough to restore a better balance of defense vs offense. I hate the notion of turning players into defensive robots and inhibiting the natural football creative and attacking instincts of players
  16. hindsight is the refuge of those with no foresight pDC
  17. oh i agree coaches will try and dig in. maybe even look for more athletic types, but let's face it most players in today's environment have to be fit and athletic anyway, certainly compared to the past and there is now a diminishing advantage in improving this aspect. sure they'll try all the tricks you allude to to maintain congestion but their options will become increasingly restrictive and i'm confident over time (and with more changes) they (at least some initially) will start to build the offensive side of their game or be left behind, won't happen overnight though. agree with your thoughts on zones. I just can't accept it with all the different suggestions i've heard. Also i don't like the reduction of players a'la the old vfa but i'm trying to keep my mind open on that one. it would certainly reduce congestion. i'm not against defence per se, it can be a great part of the game, it's just about having a good balance between defence and offence
  18. here is a snip from sheedy's article in hun re kickins.....not too much detail
  19. daisycutter replied to Demon3564's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    he's too fat, filth can have him
  20. dean, the objective is NOT to STOP congestion it is just to REDUCE congestion, thus changing the BALANCE between defence and offence
  21. iirc that is what he proposes.......will read again to check
  22. there's a good chance daniher could be a bit of a destabilising agent if he he only gets on the park occasionally which is likely
  23. well tu, only time will tell..... but i don't think we will see much either way in 2021 with 18 min qtrs and 75 rotations either way i don't see any extra risk to player's health. If anything thing the whole rotation overload caused bigger risks there's no doubt we see fitter, faster more athletic types these days, but that is largely due to the shift from semi-professional football to full-time professional football
  24. think you are allowed to. just pay a soft cap tax
  25. daisycutter replied to Billy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    past his use-by date