Skuit

Again, this is my ongoing frustration - if Watts has defended himself as a hard-worker to his father (and potentially not taken measures/or not had the influence to prevent his father speaking to the media). Jack needs to grow up and take personal responsibility for his situation. For those looking for some hidden agenda on the handling of the Watts' subject post-season, if it's anything other than exactly face-value, it's this: the club were trying to get through to Jack, once again, as they have done in an escalating fashion numerous times in the past. The nature of Jack's response since has likely determined his fate. Sadly, the devoted fans casting blame on all and sundry except Jack for his departure are unlikely to help with Jack's future maturation.

You're getting me super excited for 2018 Jumbo. Smash 'em all!!!!

I arrived at a personal conclusion based on the evidence before me and have not presented it as fact. Your concern about a Viney conflict-of-interest was raised out of left-field directly after your intimate defence of Jack Watts. But I also now find it peculiar that Jack Watts has never mentioned his captain and his player manager as you so claim.

Now that you have claimed to be acquainted with Jack, and have since raised questions as to Todd and Jack Viney's mutual employment at the club, I'm going to go right on and conclude that these particular feelings have been expressed by Jack. And while I was ambivalent before - even a tad sad - about Jack's potential departure (while fully supportive and understanding of the reasons for it), if he's blaming white-anting from some Viney faction for where he finds himself today, then he can good and well go. I'm not even going to bother outlining the contribution of the Viney's toward our singular goal of success as compared to that of one Jack Watts, as the blame being leveled and swipes taken at anyone and everyone who isn't Jack Watts is getting utterly ridiculous.

Spot on SS. Especially when one considers this a perfect representation of Jack: 300 × 400 - terapeak.com

I note the six-day break between games including a trip to Perth . . .

And this is what happened. Except Jack never got off his P's and hasn't adjusted his Sat Nav after the club made a wrong turn towards Fitzroy.

Curious as to why a lot of the better mail on here seems to come to us via Perth?

There's a lesson in this. Hard work and steady preparation can only get a forum thread so far. To achieve genuine success, you need contributors with the finishing skills and class of BBO.

There will be no internet to post on when Jack leaves. The global financial system will collapse, planes will fall from the skies, and we'll all be running around eating each other's flesh.

Except there hasn't been a post for over four minutes now and suddenly it's all looking a bit shaky in the nervous 90's.

Max and Chris seem to have got their pants mixed up. Precisely why you shouldn't live with flatmates as an adult.

Remember that time Jason Gillespie scored a double ton? Sporting historians will look back on this thread with equal perplexion.

Exactly.

Jake Spencer?

We can't seem to fully shake that Matt Jones guy from our club.

But it's like multiple flatmates. Puzzling.

This has been on my mind for a while now. Why does Jack Watts have flatmates? Surely he could afford his own place, right?

It's funny. I went to uni as originally a left-winger in one of those marijuana-hot-spots of Australia and got so sick of the lesbian white privilege that I came out even more left-wing and even partially black.

Whoa. That [censored] is heavy man. I just came to this thread for some light reading.

McCarthyism and Jack Watts were probably two subjects I never thought would be clumped together. Goody the Red (and Blue) menace?

Hey Biff. I assume you're old, so maybe you can help me? Why are a bunch of the older members of Demonland so keen on Watts? I thought you'd all have had enough by now, and be beyond the seduction of golden curls?

Watts Riots 1965: Watts Riots 2017: 300 × 216 - en.wikipedia.org 480 × 360 - pinterest.com

Watts. For abandoning us.

Forget 186. The real deal is 187. The 'California Penal Code section 187, subdivision (a) defines murder as "the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought.' Still not entirely sure where Jack fits on the human/fetus spectrum, but, with all malicious forethought intended, the last time there was some contention as to Watts, we ended up with this: 640 × 357 - timetoast.com Free Max King.