old55

The other thing to add about Spargo's game is that he regularly blocked Kossie’s opponent at forward 50 stoppages which was influential.

I think Langdon is playing the Nibbler role and Spargo is playing the Spargo role. I watched Spargo closely yesterday, he's a very disciplined defensive runner and he offered some aggressive medium range corridor attacking options on turnover which were universally ignored in favour of shorter diagonal passes - probably because of a combination of our players lacking the confidence to make the difficult kick and Spargo's aerial limitations. He's a nice creative kick when he gets it, but he doesn't get it much. Other alternatives could win more ball but they'd turn it over more.

And ruck whom?

Rankine and Hill don't play the same role as Spargo. Miers is the only accurate comparison and he's an amazing player, much better than Spargo. His ability to find the ball and hit a difficult target is great, if we had him we'd be a much better team.

He was right but for Maynard on Brayshaw.

Hopefully we've kept up the dialog with his management. He's OOC this year so it should be easier.

For those who went or watched a significant amount online - how did our Wade Derksen go as a key back for GWS?

Wade Derksen key back for GWS is of interest too.

FTR, the sooner we move on Goodwin, the better. Chaplin takes over in the meantime. I've been a Goodwin fan and the trendline before the 21 flag was clearly up, but now it's obviously down and you've got to read it. I was optimistic we could turn things around this year and the FD had credits in the bank but they’re all spent now. We probably can't pull the trigger until the new CEO is in place, hopefully it's someone with sufficient veritas and gumption. IMV there's plenty to gain by acting quickly, we can get in early with the selection process and beat other teams to the drop of the ball e.g. the Dogs. If we go for an assistant coach without senior experience (my preference) then we have time to line up a mentor to replace Richardson e.g. Ken Hinkley or Luke Beveridge - these things take runway to get lift off (it always makes me laugh when there's a hue and cry about players discussing trades during the season, whentf are they supposed to do it - during trade period?). Even if an assistant can't be released to join us because his team is playing finals e.g. Scott Burns at Adelaide, at least he can be in communication, including with players, about list changes for this season which, to say the least, are critical given the Oliver, Petracca, Pickett, Fritsch situations. I don’t think for a moment that all the problems are coaching problems but we need to continue the changes we're making there next.

We've named 6 talls in addition to Max - May, Petty, Lever, JVR, AJ and TMac. That’s a pretty standard set-up. 7 talls and 15 smalls - one of the talls is on the bench at most times so we've usually got 6 and 12 on the field - that's pretty standard. Petty and TMac can play at either end which gives flexibility and the sub will come from Melksham, Langford, Chandler and Billings so that gives the flexibility to sub a tall out. I think it's a good balance.

If Lever is out TMac comes off the bench into the starting back 6 and Disco comes out of the Emergencies to replace him on the bench and play forward. Tall out - tall in.

Two of Dland's best posters.

Yes, but 6 debutantes is still adventurous. Goodwin could definitely gone with TMac and Billings, added Laurie and Woewodin who have AFL exposure, and squeezed Melksham and Spargo in from injury early, but he didn't. He wasn't forced into the debutantes decision.

I'm generally entertained when we're winning.

"In the back" in field play is extinct.