Jump to content

old55

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by old55

  1. There's two spots available for that group to make up 7 forwards. McAdam's tackle and i50 tackles are superior to both Chandler and Spargo.
  2. Source: https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_stats.html?year=2023 Kossie: Average tackles: 4.0, Average Tackles inside 50: 2.0 McAdam: 3.3, 1.4 Fritsch: 1.6, 0.6 McAdam is more than twice a good as Fritsch in this area and closer to Kossie figures.
  3. Fwd locks: Petty, JVR, Fritsch, ANB, Kossie McAdam is probably competing with Smith, Chandler, Spargo and Laurie for the last two slots - I'd fancy him ahead of that group. Maybe AMW or even Sestan will surprise and jump up the order.
  4. Yes you're right, sorry. I was thinking Fullarton cam for a F3rd.
  5. We used the F2nd because we have 2 of them and only one F3rd. It means we can still trade our F1st.
  6. Interesting to hear Tim Lamb confirm that we see pick 11 considerably more valuable than pick 14 and that's why we traded up. There must be a quality cliff somewhere after 11 and before 14 non northern-Academy and F/S players. He said we were confident of getting very good players at 6 and 11. Cal Twomey's September rankings: To 6: Reid, (Walter), Duursma, McKercher, Watson, Curtin, Sanders To 11: Caddy, (Read), O'Sullivan, (Croft), (Rogers), Murphy, Windsor, Wilson Following those sets through to 14 are (Leake), Hardeman, (McCabe), Tholstrup, De Mattia - that's 20 players altogether. Of course we may rate someone else in that top 11.
  7. We can just take him in the PSD for free. Adelaide currently have 36 primary list players and 4 rookies. The maximum number of primary list players they can have is 38, so they currently only have 2 primary list vacancies. They currently have picks 10, 14 and 20. They actually need to lose a player to be able to use them all. There's no way they keep a list spot open for McAdam in the PSD so they can re-draft him. I hope they continue to be stupid and run the clock down on it and we get to keep the F2nd.
  8. Right, 8pts for the Trophy, thanks
  9. With that percentage difference, if we can beat both North and Freo we're home.
  10. We currently have Harmes, Grundy, Hibberd, Jordon and Dunstan off the primary list and so far we have Fullarton on and a promise to upgrade D.Turner. We currently have 3 primary list spots available. I predict we move Melksham to the Rookie list to make 4 spots, add McAdam, 2 Draft picks and match a bid on K.Brown.
  11. Tim Lamb on Gettable today specifically said that our recruitment team rates the players available at pick 11 significantly higher than those available at pick 14 and that's why we traded up. I'm sure this is taking into account that both picks will slide at least 2 spots on Draft night for GC Academy bids matched. We see a quality cliff somewhere in between that range.
  12. old55 replied to DTJ's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    How about Gunston + 30 to the Hawks for 63?
  13. old55 replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It's very fair but they seem very stupid.
  14. What do you base your Petty return prediction on?
  15. old55 replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Patience Grasshopper
  16. old55 replied to DTJ's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    He was so bad this year he had to drop himself to the VFL. Only fired against WC which means nothing.
  17. old55 replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    McAdam, Fullarton and retaining Petty. JVR, Kossie and Chandler are young players who will improve. Petty and Fritsch missed significant parts of the season. Plenty of scope for optimism there. Which forward on the move have we missed out on. Schultz, Gresham, Chol, Burgess? Be still my giddy heart.
  18. old55 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    OK, I'll trade you 6, 11 and MFC F1st for 4 and Hawthorn's F1st. Bookmark it.
  19. He said that JT thinks there's a big difference between 14 and 11 and we are confident we can get a very good player at 11 if that's the way it falls. That's pretty good information.
  20. old55 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Thanks Chaser. Hawthorn's 4 + F1st is closest to the pin currently and hard to beat. The F1st will be a top 10 pick, Hawthorn won't play finals next year. WC could even on trade it for more early picks this year. Our 6 + 11 + F1st doesn't top it and neither does 2 or 3 plus 17 from North IMO.
  21. old55 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Do you have a link to evidence that is the Hawthorn offer? They said they were in the market with pick 3 (as it was then before the McKay compo) and commentators said they'd need to add their F1st too, but I can't find any evidence where they actually offered pick 3 + F1st.
  22. And they didn't even finish last in 2022 like he claimed, they finished 3rd last - 16th. They got to play us at home in Perth on a hot day too. Unbelievable wringing!
  23. old55 replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Fremantle, Adelaide, Geelong, Essendon and Hawthorn are all proving difficult to trade with.
  24. old55 replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Who are they going to pay with the money? https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/tp-west-coast-eagles Naitanui, Shuey and Hurn all just retired along with a heap of delists: https://www.afl.com.au/trade/list-changes The main salary cap issue WC will have in 2024 is paying the AFL minimum.